Wow!! This is seeming to prove (in reality - not theoretically!!) to be an informative Thread.
Although, not informative as for the answer to to the question asked in the OP, nor for that matter many questions asked since!
It seems to be very informative though as to the lengths some people will go to protect the emotional, logical and mental aspects of their tiny *Monkeysphere(s)*.
to wit : (quotes edited/condensed to conserve space - real space, not theoretical - not content!)
1.) - OP initial question and follow ups - (real questions, not theoretical)
At the point of BB concentration...What were the magnetic fields strength
Some think...no magnetic fields...I find this hard to believe
How you can have condensed matter , with NO magnetic fields until after the fact ?
2.) - response (theoretical, not real) and meh! (real, not theoretical) - first inkling of *Ms*
Simple...BB not a creation/evolution, of matter/energy...a creation/evolution of space and time./
Then ... period of Inflation ...space and time expanded at FTL velocities...Matter and energy later...fact the first 380,000... Plasma. Electrons were not able to connect to atomic nucleus during this hot/dense period...gravity controlling force.
What you find hard to believe is a matter of fact. *shrug*
3.) - an honest (real) follow up/feedback on theoretical answer(!?!?) ^^above^^
The problem I have with this is based on experimental proof. I can expand a large ball of matter with an explosion, and because the mass density decrease, the local space and time will expand with the lowering mass density. We have mass leading space-time.
How do you prove space-time can expand first, and separate matter? What experiment has been done to make sure this is real and not just a wishful assumption needed to sure up weak theory? What lab test was done to show this?
4.) - more answers (theoretical, not real) and admission to no real answer or logical basis for theoretical ones(!?!?) - more inkling of *Ms*
Experimental proof ...BB does not exist...I know. BB...term of derision...to push "Steady State" theory,...not an explosion. It follows from observed expansion/present CMBR, Universe was smaller in past. eventually...back to the Planck volume. follows logically (?)... " E=Mc2 " .mass does not lead space/time....What...makes space/time expand is not as yet known, ... theorise(?)...force called the CC or Dark Energy.
I think the CMBR experiments would confirm the existence of the CMBR and the Big Bang. Guth is pretty clear about how inflation could occur [the physics] to initiate the big bang. Experimental evidence included.
5.) - non-concur/honest (real) follow up/feedback on theoretical answer(!?!?) ^^above^^
Disagree. How does space and time evolve , without energy and matter ?
6.) - theoretical repeating - begin belittling - more than inkling of *Ms*
Matter/energy from space and time...all the forces combined in first instant of time...initial event...space and time evolved from singularity...space and time between t=0 and t= 10-45 sec]...temperatures and pressures drop...phase transitions/false vacuums were created..ed the excesses of energy between different states...form first fundamentals...plain sailing...indicated by standard cosmological data/gravity, as you have been told many times by many people.
7.) - ???!!!/honest (real) follow up/feedback on theoretical answer(!?!?) ^^above^^
You didn't answer my question. How does space and time evolve and create , without energy and matter ?
8.) - seemingly defensive attacks for not accepting theoretical parroting - full on *MS*
Yes I did. You are burdened somewhat though with your plasma/electric Universe rubbish.
Again, The BB was an evolution of space and time from a hotter denser state....Matter came later.
Answer your own question . Answering your own question would require doing a little research into the physics of cosmology. Do it and show some intellectual honesty. The only way you will learn is thru river research efforts since river makes it a point not to ever listen to anybody else.
Yep, I truly think that is a shame.
9.) - honest (real) follow up/feedback on theoretical answer(!?!?) ^^above^^
How does space and time become hotter and denser ?
10.) - seemingly defensive attacks - full on *MS*
What is the temperature of space? What is the temperature of time? ? A good place to begin is Guth's Eternal Inflation theory and the experimental results associated with the theoretical predictions inflation makes about the beginning of this universe and possible others in a predicted multiverse. A good place to find out much about this science is the WMAP site where they provide theoretical information how the experimental results correlate with theoretical predictions. Good reading.
@paddoboy
@brucep
If you can not answer the questions, why Post theoretical ramblings and digs at other Posters who are simply asking honest questions?
If you honestly and fully understand the theoretical physics you parrot/repeat ad nauseam in the Thread (Forum!) why not :
1.) - simply answer the question in layman's terms - not that hard if you honestly and fully understand the theoretical physics
2.) - simply be truly honest and say that you have no answer
3.) - simply refrain from Posting - esp. answers seemingly designed to show some sort of intellectual superiority
I, too, would appreciate honest answers to the questions broached in this Thread !