And you? Does anyone take seriously anything you say? Aren't you the only one who chose option 1 of the poll?
Split: SAM's intellectual dishonesty and poor moderation
- Thread starter (Q)
- Start date
- Status
And you? Does anyone take seriously anything you say? Aren't you the only one who chose option 1 of the poll?
So, Sam, have you any comments as to the results of the poll, the fact that most everyone here thinks you're intellectually dishonest?
Is that the Muslim way? Or, is it just you personally?
Are you going to do the right thing and resign as moderator?
Or, are you going to continue as usual?
Thoughts on the absence thereof, and other remarks
Yawn. Why is this Crusade still afoot?
Have fun stormin' the castle.
I wouldn't go so far as to say "no one". There are always a few rabid anti-authoritarians who will latch onto any bandwagon. They'll at least pretend to take these folks seriously.
Indeed.
I would consider giving you certain advice, but I'm actually of the opinion you already understand these points and have your own reasons—which, if I understand them correctly, I can agree with—for taking a different route.
So that leaves me with nothing to say but, "Chin up", and, well, even that you seem to have a handle on.
If a tree falls in the forest, why, specifically, should anybody care?
Yawn. Why is this Crusade still afoot?
Have fun stormin' the castle.
• • •
Exhumed said:
I wouldn't go so far as to say "no one". There are always a few rabid anti-authoritarians who will latch onto any bandwagon. They'll at least pretend to take these folks seriously.
• • •
S.A.M. said:
Indeed.
I would consider giving you certain advice, but I'm actually of the opinion you already understand these points and have your own reasons—which, if I understand them correctly, I can agree with—for taking a different route.
So that leaves me with nothing to say but, "Chin up", and, well, even that you seem to have a handle on.
• • •
If a tree falls in the forest, why, specifically, should anybody care?
I'm going for the larger sample size, its more scientific.
Small sample sizes could give false positive results due to lower power.
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=79015
My feelings as well.
Ditto.
I don't know what forums she moderates, so I can't really give an opinion on her moderating skills, but as far as her political postings, those types don't like her cause very few can intellectually stand up to her. While people may disagree with her positions, at least she is able to back up what she says and feels. I've no problem with her and find her to be one of the few people who's posts I look forward to and learn something from, second only to Fraggle Rocker.
Anyways, go ahead and get rid of her if the majority want to, this place is going to hell anyways with all the good posters leaving due to this crap. I wasn't able to vote in whatever thread the votes were in, but I'd say keep her and get rid of the ones whining about her.
- N
Thanks T. It's nice to see you support the intellectually dishonest.
So, we can assume you'll continue lying?
Bells
Staff member
Huh you are going to tell me what I should find funny now?
In other words, you're saying 'yeah.. what he said!!!'..
What I had meant was that the humour in those cartoons were beyond your realm of understanding or comprehension.
Indeed.Sam said:
Fun innit?
I guess.
...
OT (but who cares in this thread). I just saw where your avatar comes from (when I was looking for a scientific cartoon for the thread on B&G)
LOL.
I like quite a lot of them
Like these:http://pbfcomics.com/archive_b/PBF245-Fire_Alarm.gif
http://pbfcomics.com/archive_b/PBF184-Durab_Inc..gif
http://pbfcomics.com/archive_b/PBF178-Truancy_bot.gif
http://pbfcomics.com/archive_b/PBF234-Finneas.jpg
Last edited:
So basically you are calling me stupid, just because I don't share your dull
sense of humour. Okkkkkk then..
It's about integrity, man
Perhaps you missed the point, (Q). I disagree with your intellectually dishonest grudge.
Life is performance art, dude. Maybe S.A.M.'s context is too complex for your perception or palate, but you're not being honest by restricting her to your context.
(Q) said:
Perhaps you missed the point, (Q). I disagree with your intellectually dishonest grudge.
Life is performance art, dude. Maybe S.A.M.'s context is too complex for your perception or palate, but you're not being honest by restricting her to your context.
Heh.
Man.
You two are horrible trolls.
You try, yes?
I want to mock, but you're just so pathetic that it's not even worth it.
"LIAR!"
Heh.
Man.
You two are horrible trolls.
You try, yes?
I want to mock, but you're just so pathetic that it's not even worth it.
"LIAR!"
Heh.
I don't know how she moderates, I don't really care. But I disagree with the charge of intellectual dishonesty: in order to have that quality, one must possess intellect; she doesn't have any. She snipped facts here and there and keeps repeating them without hope to make sense to herself or anyone else. A parrot can do that also.
Someone said she's the nicest, whatever. Sciforums is not for being nice to everyone, sciforums is for contributing intellectually interesting material.
Someone said she's the nicest, whatever. Sciforums is not for being nice to everyone, sciforums is for contributing intellectually interesting material.
So why are you here?
Exactly.
Some of us remember the subscript to the title of this site: "An Intelligent Community"...
Alas, it seems that this has been forgotten. There's even (somehow) a Mod that consistently misspells 3 out of 5 words per sentence.
Oh god, how many anti-SAM threads are we going to have? If was a mod with this much against me, I'd probably resign.
- Status