Sam has now stooped to making false accusations. A very sad state of affairs. She needs to resign immediately as moderator.
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1794366&postcount=324
this link doesn't work?
Sam has now stooped to making false accusations. A very sad state of affairs. She needs to resign immediately as moderator.
http://www.sciforums.com/showpost.php?p=1794366&postcount=324
this link doesn't work?
She needs to resign immediately as moderator.
Are we talking about the same S.A.M.? S.A.M. the moderator?![]()
She is one of the nicest member and moderator I have ever interact. :shrug:
Some people might find her intellectuality a bit intimidating, but that is
because she is a way too intelligent. At least in my opinion...![]()
I hate to disagree with you........But LOL...
You are the nicest member here by far anyway.
As far as Sam goes I wish you knew her like I did.
I think you would think differently.
Are we talking about the same S.A.M.? S.A.M. the moderator?![]()
She is one of the nicest member and moderator I have ever interact. :shrug:
Some people might find her intellectuality a bit intimidating, but that is
because she is a way too intelligent. At least in my opinion...![]()
I hate to disagree with you........But LOL...
You are the nicest member here by far anyway.
As far as Sam goes I wish you knew her like I did.
I think you would think differently.
Agree. The only thing I didn't like about her is that I didn't get to see one of her special pics.
these inadequate actions are targeted at disrupting a peaciful order set up by moderator SAM, moreover moderators need to reconcile the ability of such individuals such as phologistician to disrupt a social network within this forum entirely. Assessement of this ability of disruption of Sciforums must be made, before individuals such as phlogistician go on forth and destroy the main frame of social networking rules and laws.
these inadequate actions are targeted at disrupting a peaciful order set up by moderator SAM, moreover moderators need to reconcile the ability of such individuals such as phologistician to disrupt a social network within this forum entirely. Assessement of this ability of disruption of Sciforums must be made, before individuals such as phlogistician go on forth and destroy the main frame of social networking rules and laws.
why are you such a kiss ass Draq?
![]()
From a small portion of members polled (19) in a short time, (4) hours at best, we find an interesting demographic.
1) There is a split differing by about 20% on whether SAM moderates fairly or not. I suspect this would turn out a wash.
2) Although 37% of those think she moderates fairly, a whopping 84% think SAM is intellectually dishonest.
3) Almost half 48% think SAM does not moderate fairly and is intellectually dishonest.
Maybe we should make a poll to find what demographic thinks you should STFU already.
No one takes anything you (or shorty) says about SAM seriously.
Maybe we should make a poll to find what demographic thinks you should STFU already. .