I think I've been here long enough now, time for something else..
Goodbye
rather flippant, ja?
apologize to sam
Split: SAM's intellectual dishonesty and poor moderation
- Thread starter (Q)
- Start date
- Status
rather flippant, ja?
apologize to sam
Not necessary, I can understand cultural variations in whats considered offensive, I was just pointing out what its like on the other side.
Besides I like Enmos, he showed me the beauty in a bee. One of the most memorable experiences in my life.
Bells
Staff member
Rightttt.. I think your version of scientific is different to what science actually is. 'Sceince' maybe?
My place on this planet is not to please you Q.
Where?
In other words, you are simply unable to provide any facts to prove or back your side of the argument. Akin to the following scenario:
Little Johnny: Miss.. Sammy is lying!
Teacher: Why Johnny? What did she say?
Little Johnny: It doesn't matter, she's lying!!
Teacher: Ok, but you need to tell me what she said..
Little Johnny: I don't need to tell you what she said!
Teacher: Then how can I gauge if she is lying or not?
Little Johnny: She didn't say anything.. She's just lying!
Teacher: So you don't know whether she's lying or not? Can you show me where she lied?
Little Johnny: I can't, but she's lying!!
Teacher: Well I can't do anything about it unless you tell me where she lied or what she said.
Little Johnny: I don't need to prove anything to you!
What? You're accusing the administration of incompetence now?
Own foot.. shooting.. I'm sure you can add the rest.
gustav got connections with the mods, even if he curses or threatens people he will be fine.
If communication is too much to ask of you, what's the point?
I'm unsure of what aspect to address of such a nonspecific retort, so I'll simply reiterate a portion I riffed in consideration of Bells' discussion with John99:
Beyond that, I have to guess at what it is you're referring to. And given how afraid you are to take responsibility for the things you actually do write, Geoff, I'm not even going to guess as to what you haven't.
GeoffP said:
I'm unsure of what aspect to address of such a nonspecific retort, so I'll simply reiterate a portion I riffed in consideration of Bells' discussion with John99:
• There is a philosophical spectrum among the membership that feels oppressed. And the reason they feel oppressed is that they cannot tell the difference between the content of an idea and the fact that the idea exists. Failing to recognize this difference, all they see is that idea = idea. Thus, if we give respect to idea1, we must give equal respect to idea2 regardless of the content of either idea.
Beyond that, I have to guess at what it is you're referring to. And given how afraid you are to take responsibility for the things you actually do write, Geoff, I'm not even going to guess as to what you haven't.
I think there is a more fundamental difference that sets people apart:
It is crucial to some worldviews, philosophies and religions to hold that a tenet of theirs is not just an "idea", but is the truth, a fact, the reality.
Begging the question?
I do not disagree. But it does beg the question of the difference between belief and communication.
What validates belief? Why is validation important at all?
Greenberg said:
I do not disagree. But it does beg the question of the difference between belief and communication.
• Not every belief that can be communicated is valid.
• Not every valid belief can be communicated.
• Not every valid belief can be communicated.
What validates belief? Why is validation important at all?
:yawn:
It's funny how this discussion about how Sam isn't fit to be a mod is such a popular subject among the members here. Yet her Biology Threads which she moderates look like they are going down the toilet. Could it be because everyone is getting fed up with her BS and having their posts deleted on a reg basis. hmmmmmmmmm
Are you accusing me of intellectual dishonesty?
She should do the right thing and step down. Unless of course, you support intellectually dishonest habitual liars as moderators?
Talking with Bells is a waste of time. She's an emotional idiot. One simply need look at her responses here.
Is that a fact? Kudos to you for turning this around at me.
I'm indebted to your superior skills, honed from watching Oprah, no doubt.
That's bullshit and you know it.
Yes. I'm completely stupid. Happy?
First of all, I'm not wasting my time putting together a case for your benefit or for Bells. That would acknowledge that I actually did care what either of you housewives thought.
Secondly, if you've been following along, which apparently you have been or you wouldn't be responding here, you'd know damn well SAM is an intellectually dishonest habitual liar. The majority here already do, and it would be the ultimate in ignorance if you mods didn't know what was going on. I'm sure your secret mod forum is alive and well, is it not? So, try not to act too surprised.
Lastly, I'm not arguing for SAM to step down as moderator because she is a deluded Muslim with an agenda of propaganda. It's too much fun watching her wriggle and dance around her silly responses.
I'm arguing because the vast majority here recognize and acknowledge SAM as an intellectually dishonest habitual liar.
Obviously, you don't. So, you either are defending SAM because you think she's as honest as the day is long or because you're a another mod.
Enmos
Valued Senior Member
The big basic questions.
A philosophical, ethical and religious cunundrum.
My guess is that the main reason why discussions and debates, including forums like this, exist is that the participators have not yet found the(ir) answers to those questions, or have found them and want to convince others of them.
Typical, your intellectual dishonesty shines through once again. You deleted the post in which you accused me of that, but I managed to quote you before you did, hence you had no choice but to recant your accusation as the evidence of your lies is there for all to read.
Step down Sam, immediately. You're not fit to represent these fora.
- Status