Some Problems with Big Bang Theory

Do You Belive In Big Bang Theory ?

  • Total voters
    15
R

RawThinkTank

Banned
Banned
If there was a BB then the matter should hush out at same speed in all direction at the same rate. After formation of atoms ( which too is not possible if every point particle is going away from each other) how come we get the visible universe ? At max there should have been only atoms going away from each other.

After billions of years of expansion there should have been huge spherical gap in universe originating from its center and the universe should have been just a balloon like thinner structure at astronomical scale.

Please correct the above statements.
 
Also in order to conserve charge, matter, and spin, etc - there would have to be an equal amount of matter and anti matter produced which, since it was so close together, would have almost instantly cancelled itself out. And if the imbalance that they detected is true (in pair production, etc, between matter and anti matter) then thats basically saying we dont need conservation of mass and quantum physics is false... Oh, and I'm sorry if any of that info is false. If so, correct me plz =]
 
I think our data can be interpreted in many diffrent ways. It's too soon to say anything about it.
 
What should be speed of objects moving in opposite direction from the big bang because now we know that they are in acceleration ?

Is it possible that objects escaping due to centrifugal force would gain acceleration with reference to each other ? or is moons going away from earth accelerating.

Is BB possible , because if it was then with such mass it should turn instantly in a Black Hole and that’s because it would otherwise require infinite energy to explode ?
 
@ ddovola: There has to be some violation of baryon number conservation in order for slightly more matter than antimatter to have been produced in the Big Bang. To account for this, physicists believe that baryons (protons and neutrons) are ultimately unstable, and therefore cannot last forever.

@ RawThinkTank: If space as a whole is 4-dimensional, and is still expanding from the Big Bang, all objects in our 3-D perspective will be moving away from each other at the same speed - except that speed of recession is cumulative with the amount of space between 2 objects. Therefore, remoter objects appear to recede faster than near ones.

Centrifugal force might make a difference on a local scale, like within a newly-forming planetary system - but its effect is nothing compared to the overall expansion of the Universe, which does not operate on such small scales.

About the idea of the total Universal mass forming a black hole before the BB could happen - current theories imagine a momentary phase of superluminal expansion (inflation), stretching space by a factor of 10^50 within the first picosecond of the BB. This would overcome the initial gravitational binding of the Universe.
 
now are we talking about the "Big Bang theory" (only 1 ever happend) or the Big Bangs theory" (many big bangs)?
 
The latter would be the Oscillating Universe theory - that the Universe explodes, expands, slows to a halt under its own gravity, and collapses back to a single point for another Big Bang. As stable and reassuring as this idea is, modern cosmologists are reluctantly compelled to abandon it: there seems to be too little mass in the Universe to ever arrest the expansion. Indeed, in recent years most evidence has indicated that the expansion is actually getting faster.
 
Starthane Xyzth said:
The latter would be the Oscillating Universe theory - that the Universe explodes, expands, slows to a halt under its own gravity, and collapses back to a single point for another Big Bang. As stable and reassuring as this idea is, modern cosmologists are reluctantly compelled to abandon it: there seems to be too little mass in the Universe to ever arrest the expansion. Indeed, in recent years most evidence has indicated that the expansion is actually getting faster.
Click to expand...
What could possibly make it faster!?!? :confused:
 
Read this carefully,

Now we know that universe expansion is indeed accelerating, that says it was slower in the beginning. So what was its speed 15 billion years ago, Can U see where this thread is heading ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top