Solar Cycle cause

Of course there can be alternative explanations but they must at least be logically consistent and make use of sound scientific priciples. Your conjectures demonstrate neither of these attributes. Your conjectures are little more than hand waving uninformed guesses that do not come close to a expressing a cogent idea.

Sorry, but you know... it is what it is.

Yes, it is indeed what it is. Your resistance is a product of your infallibility, such is life. Simply because you do not understand the sound scientific principles I have presented as evidence across all my posts doesn't mean you are right, it means you are close-minded. And that is indeed "what it is". When the time comes that the scientific community begins to tell you to, I hope you open your mind. G'luck.
 
Wow, you truly don't understand the truth of Occam's Razor do you? The goal of science is to TAKE AWAY not to ADD. The Big Bang adds: expansion of space, dark energy, finite universe. See the critical flaw here, open your eyes.

Certainly I understand the truth of "Occam's Razor" The question is do you?
I mean do you really believe that the observed Universal expansion, the CMBR detected as predicted, should be discarded in favour of an undetected, inevidenced, unseen companion around which the Sun is making an unseen, unevidenced orbit in a 22 years period?

The goal of science is to take away???
Do you have any example of that? Unless you are referring to the knowledge that science gains for us as a species, that is taking away the Ignorance, and removing the silly mythical necessity of any magical deity or sky pixie.
In that case, then sure, science is taking away Ignorance and replacing it with logic and knowledge.

An example of that Ignorance which you so much display is evident in your statement,
" The Big Bang adds: expansion of space, dark energy, finite universe. See the critical flaw here, open your eyes."
Are you really serious?
The BB added nothing...The BB is an obvious outcome logically formulated to explain the expansion observations.
The DE as yet is unexplained, as science is a progress of knowledge gained over time, as opposed to the staid, unmoving, obstinate, illogical myths as reflected by religions.
Finite Universe?? Maybe, but I have already informed you science is not as yet hard and fast on whether the Universe is finite or Infinite.

No doubt like all religious/Creationists you will ignore those facts and continue on your evangelistic mission to convert us Godless infidels. And of course remain Ignorant of the facts that stare you in the face everyday.
Yet, your magical pixie in the sky, continues to be pushed further and further back into oblivion, replaced by scientific knowledge.
No wonder you evangelistic kind are in a mad scramble to shore up whatever myths you can in the face of this continued onslaught.
Best of luck.
 
Certainly I understand the truth of "Occam's Razor" The question is do you?
I mean do you really believe that the observed Universal expansion, the CMBR detected as predicted, should be discarded in favour of an undetected, inevidenced, unseen companion around which the Sun is making an unseen, unevidenced orbit in a 22 years period?

I at no point said the companion star was a replacement for observations of the large-scale structure of the universe. The "observed Universal expansion", as you so ignorantly put it, is an ASSUMPTION. It is an OBSERVED redshift, and NOTHING MORE. This is then INTERPRETED as Doppler shift because it was ASSUMED that gravity was not the cause due to the observation being in ALL DIRECTIONS. DO you at least grasp that this is true? I am not saying anything about my theory here, simply displaying the thought process of the Big Bang.

The goal of science is to take away???
Do you have any example of that? Unless you are referring to the knowledge that science gains for us as a species, that is taking away the Ignorance, and removing the silly mythical necessity of any magical deity or sky pixie.
In that case, then sure, science is taking away Ignorance and replacing it with logic and knowledge.

The FUNDAMENTAL LAWS OF NATURE are examples. Do you UNDERSTAND what FUNDAMENTAL means?

An example of that Ignorance which you so much display is evident in your statement,
Are you really serious?
The BB added nothing...The BB is an obvious outcome logically formulated to explain the expansion observations.
The DE as yet is unexplained, as science is a progress of knowledge gained over time, as opposed to the staid, unmoving, obstinate, illogical myths as reflected by religions.
Finite Universe?? Maybe, but I have already informed you science is not as yet hard and fast on whether the Universe is finite or Infinite.

The Big Bang absolutely adds. Prior to the observations that led to the Big Bang, there was in NO WAY SHAPE OR FORM discussion of EXPANSION OF SPACE. The ASSUMPTION OF DOPPLER SHIFT introduced expansion of space SO AS TO NOT BREAK THE LAWS OF PHYSICS.

No doubt like all religious/Creationists you will ignore those facts and continue on your evangelistic mission to convert us Godless infidels. And of course remain Ignorant of the facts that stare you in the face everyday.
Yet, your magical pixie in the sky, continues to be pushed further and further back into oblivion, replaced by scientific knowledge.
No wonder you evangelistic kind are in a mad scramble to shore up whatever myths you can in the face of this continued onslaught.
Best of luck.

You are so blind. I feel sorry for you. Hugs.
 
You are so blind. I feel sorry for you. Hugs.

I'm not going to comment on your nonsensical posts that are fanatically driven by religious/anti science agenda, other then to say, if you have any evidence of your assumptions, get it peer reviewed.
What are you afraid of?

Otherwise ol chap, all you are doing here is posting nonsense to those that in the main are aware of the observed evidence and how certain we are of the BB model.
You are making no difference here with your evangelistic missionary type venture.
It's mainstream science in general you need to convince of your fairy tales.
But that won't happen. Because their job is to gain knowledge and rid the world of the Ignorance that you are burdened with.
You God, your church, your beliefs, and your fairy tails manufactured to support them here, are falling on deaf ears
The world will continue. The BB will continue to be further reinforced and science will continue on with its job.
Live with it.
Bye...I have a busy day.
 
I'm not going to comment on your nonsensical posts that are fanatically driven by religious/anti science agenda, other then to say, if you have any evidence of your assumptions, get it peer reviewed.
What are you afraid of?

I am, you act like its an instantaneous process. As a matter of fact, I submitted to Science last night.

Otherwise ol chap, all you are doing here is posting nonsense to those that in the main are aware of the observed evidence and how certain we are of the BB model.
You are making no difference here with your evangelistic missionary type venture.
It's mainstream science in general you need to convince of your fairy tales.
But that won't happen. Because their job is to gain knowledge and rid the world of the Ignorance that you are burdened with.
You God, your church, your beliefs, and your fairy tails manufactured to support them here, are falling on deaf ears
The world will continue. The BB will continue to be further reinforced and science will continue on with its job.
Live with it.
Bye...I have a busy day.

Bye!
 
I am, you act like its an instantaneous process. As a matter of fact, I submitted to Science last night.



Do you really think that I, or anyone else for that matter, believes that?
My Mum, when I was a toddler, would often tell me, "telling lies makes little baby Jesus cry" Man! You have the poor little thing bawling its brains out! :shrug:
 
Your resistance is a product of your infallibility, such is life.
But I am not infallible! I resist your ideas because they are nonsensical and demonstrably incorrect. It has nothing to do with a closed mind; it only has to do with actually using your mind just a little bit!

Simply because you do not understand the sound scientific principles I have presented as evidence across all my posts doesn't mean you are right, it means you are close-minded.
Oh my poor deluded fellow, you wouldn't know a sound scientific priciple if it hit you between the eyes! Your ideas are so simple a 10 year old could understand them - the problem is even a 10 year old could also see they are absurd.

When the time comes that the scientific community begins to tell you to, I hope you open your mind.
I have no idea what that is suppose to mean.
 
Do you really think that I, or anyone else for that matter, believes that?
My Mum, when I was a toddler, would often tell me, "telling lies makes little baby Jesus cry" Man! You have the poor little thing bawling its brains out! :shrug:

That's funny, that you think I care what you believe. I have no interest in telling lies, that is not the way of an enlightened soul.
 
If the poles (of OUR black hole) SPIN at an independent RATE of the spiral arms maybe I would consider your proposal of EVIDENCED solar activity.
 
If the poles (of OUR black hole) SPIN at an independent RATE of the spiral arms maybe I would consider your proposal of EVIDENCED solar activity.

You mean the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way? Or my proposed black hole that the sun is orbiting? If you mean my proposed black hole, what do you mean by "the spiral arms"? If you mean the center of the Milky Way, is the sun's orbit not sufficient? It is 225-250 million years per revolution about the center of the Milky Way, which is why I did not feel it was the cause.
 
That's funny, that you think I care what you believe. I have no interest in telling lies, that is not the way of an enlightened soul.

Another delusion to add to your other delusions. Give me evidence that a soul exists?
You can't...Just as you can't invalidate standard cosmology, and just as you havn't any scientific paper, or even pseudoscientific for that matter.
The only thing you do have is audacity, delusions, Ignorance, stubborness and your evangelistic crusade to convert us evil deniers.
 
Another delusion to add to your other delusions. Give me evidence that a soul exists?
You can't...Just as you can't invalidate standard cosmology, and just as you havn't any scientific paper, or even pseudoscientific for that matter.
The only thing you do have is audacity, delusions, Ignorance, stubborness and your evangelistic crusade to convert us evil deniers.

Only a philosophical mind can be enlightened. You can't see the problem of the Big Bang, what more can I do?
 
Only a philosophical mind can be enlightened. You can't see the problem of the Big Bang, what more can I do?

The minor problems that may exist with the BB, will be solved in the passage of time, by mainstream cosmologists.
You were born in the belly of stars sscully, just like everyone else, and one day your body will return to the stars from whence it came.
No soul at all, and thankfully for you, no hell for your soul to burn in for the multitude of falsehoods you spreading on the forum.
Just a wasted life, never achieving the fruits of your crusade.
Religion is dead my friend...It has no future in a modern scientific world of progress.
 
You mean the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way? Or my proposed black hole that the sun is orbiting? If you mean my proposed black hole, what do you mean by "the spiral arms"? If you mean the center of the Milky Way, is the sun's orbit not sufficient? It is 225-250 million years per revolution about the center of the Milky Way, which is why I did not feel it was the cause.

UR an Idiot. I'm a drunk. 250 million years the time it takes to traverse the spiral arms. A "BLACKHOLE" or our black hole more specifically "COULD" "SPIN" faster than something outside its SPECIFIC radius.
 
The minor problems that may exist with the BB, will be solved in the passage of time, by mainstream cosmologists.
You were born in the belly of stars sscully, just like everyone else, and one day your body will return to the stars from whence it came.
No soul at all, and thankfully for you, no hell for your soul to burn in for the multitude of falsehoods you spreading on the forum.
Just a wasted life, never achieving the fruits of your crusade.
Religion is dead my friend...It has no future in a modern scientific world of progress.

"Minor" ha! Nuff said.
 
He really had the Goethe to say "we were all born in the belly of stars"? WOW,

I guess we really do need some sort of negative or else it all just fluctuates into unintelligible syntax.
 
Back
Top