Skeptic finds 4 year Bigfoot project "intriguing"

Status
Not open for further replies.
In 2002, she said during an interview with NPR that she was sure of it.
Click to expand...

Like I said, she's sure they exist and even mentions the hair samples they have gotten and the numerous accounts of them from 30 books. So that basically backs up what I said. Jane Goodall believes in Bigfoot.

As for your usual tripe, just more of BS about rock-throwing bears and there being no evidence. You are pretty much a stuck record aren't you? You don't even respond to my arguments. You just ignore them and repeat the same old unevidenced claims about some sort of hoax and rock-throwing bears. Like I said, you have no argument to make here. That much is clear.

Survivorman Les Stroud's Bigfoot encounter:




Various video and photos of Bigfoot:



Group of people spot a Bigfoot in the trees:


Elk hunters capture Bigfoot on video:


Provo Canyon footage:



Yellowtop Colorado footage:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9vvwRlyq3A


Police dash cam video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xmr-cDD0Hdk

9 extraordinary frames from hunter's stealth cam:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SOVhQCoR2AI


The Paul Freeman footage:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibmgaGnRl_8


Rafters on McKenzie River in Oregon capture 2 Bigfoots (Bigfeet?)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRNfvMEfr5Y

North Carolina deer hunters capture Bigfoot on video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UNj2J6l76lo

Hikers capture Bigfoot in the distance:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1554cn6Hgjw

Memorial Day footage:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoWLkeLLhYQ

Sequoia National Forest CA video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AIIgGtpcG94
 
Last edited:
You are pretty much a stuck record aren't you? You don't even respond to counter-arguments. You just ignore them and repeat the same old unevidenced claims about some sort of Bigfoot creature. You have no argument to make here. That much is clear.
 
Sooo..

Those analysis are all on youtube? And all posted by bigfoot sites.

Because that doesn't sound weird or suspicious at all....

And Jane Goodall also said that the lack of scientific evidence means they are not likely to exist. Emphasis on the words "lack of scientific evidence" because you appear to be lacking that part.
 
Magical Realist said:
Yep..must've been those wild monkeys and sea otters in the mountains of Oklahoma! lol!
Click to expand...

Prove to me it wasn't a monkey or sea otter - after all, there is just as much evidence that it was (you are talking about using rocks as "tools" - here we have video showing both of these creatures are capable of doing so) a monkey or sea otter... after all, we know they exist, we have video evidence of them using rocks as tools... that's more evidence than we have for "bigfoot" (namely that we have seen sea otters and monkeys)
 
Kittamaru said:
Prove to me it wasn't a monkey or sea otter - after all, there is just as much evidence that it was (you are talking about using rocks as "tools" - here we have video showing both of these creatures are capable of doing so) a monkey or sea otter... after all, we know they exist, we have video evidence of them using rocks as tools... that's more evidence than we have for "bigfoot" (namely that we have seen sea otters and monkeys)
Click to expand...

LOL! How ridiculous. What evidence that it was a monkey or a sea otter? Go ahead. Show us the evidence. Show us the footage of monkeys and sea otters in the remote mountains of Oklahoma throwing rocks and using them to crush nuts.
 
origin said:
Precisely the same evidence that 'it' was a big foot. Actually a monkey or a sea otter is more likely because at least there is proof that they exist!
Click to expand...

Proof that wild monkeys and sea otters exist in the mountains of Oklahoma? Go ahead and show us that then.
 
Magical Realist said:
No..that doesn't make sense. A research team doesn't spend a period of 4 years meticulously recording details indicating the presence of Bigfoot just to fake their own results. That's not a credible explanation, and neither are the magical rock-throwing bears you keep making up. To allege fakery you have to show how it is at least plausible in this case. You don't. You just wildly slander people as hoaxers because you have no other explanation for the events reported.
Click to expand...
We don't need another explanation. We don't need any explanation. Proof of new species are often given in science, and none of the standards have been met.
 
Magical Realist said:
LOL! How ridiculous. What evidence that it was a monkey or a sea otter? Go ahead. Show us the evidence. Show us the footage of monkeys and sea otters in the remote mountains of Oklahoma throwing rocks and using them to crush nuts.
Click to expand...

I already did - otters and monkeys use rocks as tools - which is more evidence then you can provide for it being a bigfoot doing it.

Go ahead, I dare you - show me a video of Bigfoot using rocks to crush nuts :)

Magical Realist said:
Proof that wild monkeys and sea otters exist in the mountains of Oklahoma? Go ahead and show us that then.
Click to expand...

I've provided as much evidence that Sea Otters are in the mountains of Oklahoma as you have that Bigfoot is there. What's wrong - do you not like the standards of proof that you have so generously brought this forum down to?
 
Kittamaru said:
I I've provided as much evidence that Sea Otters are in the mountains of Oklahoma as you have that Bigfoot is there. What's wrong - do you not like the standards of proof that you have so generously brought this forum down to?
Click to expand...
He clearly has no idea what proof or evidence is.
 
Kittamaru said:
Yeah, I'm aware - but I have to admit, it's fun being able to play by his rules of "evidence" lol!
Click to expand...
True and based on his rules of evidence it appears that you are a in fact a little horse with wings (a gray one I believe)
 
origin said:
True and based on his rules of evidence it appears that you are a in fact a little horse with wings (a gray one I believe)
Click to expand...

Indeed I am! Though the proper term is "pony", not horse :)
 
Kittamaru said:
I already did - otters and monkeys use rocks as tools - which is more evidence then you can provide for it being a bigfoot doing it.

Go ahead, I dare you - show me a video of Bigfoot using rocks to crush nuts :)



I've provided as much evidence that Sea Otters are in the mountains of Oklahoma as you have that Bigfoot is there. What's wrong - do you not like the standards of proof that you have so generously brought this forum down to?
Click to expand...

Wrong. The whole report cited in the OP is evidence of Bigfoot. I also cited eyewitness accounts, audio clips, video footage, footprints casts with dermal ridges, and photos of Bigfoot. Now you have to provide evidence for your claim that it is wild monkeys and sea otters. Do monkeys and sea otters even live in the woods of Oklahoma? Where's your evidence for this? You're making a claim. Now support it.
 
Last edited:
spidergoat said:
We don't need another explanation. We don't need any explanation. Proof of new species are often given in science, and none of the standards have been met.
Click to expand...

I like how you dance around between the words "evidence" and "proof". As if they are the same thing. Or is it that you just having to move the goal posts to "proof" when I present this evidence?
 
Magical Realist said:
Wrong. The whole report cited in the OP is evidence of Bigfoot. I also cited eyewitness accounts, audio clips, video footage, footprints casts with dermal ridges, and photos of Bigfoot. Now you have to provide evidence for your claim that it is wild monkeys and sea otters. Where's your evidence for this? You're making a claim. Now support it.
Click to expand...

Again, I've already provided evidence - they use rocks as tools, your report claimed rocks were being used as tools - if anything, my claim is MORE substantiated because I have pictures and video of Sea Otters using rocks as tools... do YOU have any pictures of Bigfoot using rocks as tools?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top