Should we get more Moderators?

Should we get more Moderators?

  • Yes, we need at lest 1 dedicated moderator for each sub-forum.

    Votes: 18 46.2%

  • Yes, we need more moderators for specific sub-forums.

    Votes: 20 51.3%

  • No.

    Votes: 3 7.7%

  • No, we need less!

    Votes: 4 10.3%
  • Total voters
    39
So, what exactly would a pseudoscience mod do? Basically just delete insults/spams?

While I wouldn't mind a mod who deleted nonsensical posts, I wonder if that is what's actually wanted...
 
CounslerCoffee said:
And drink constantly. Just don't log onto sciforums while drunk. I've learned a few things from doing that.
Click to expand...
and also when you're high up there :m:
though it was a very interesting discussion back then... :cool: :p
 
I think we need more than a pseudoscience mod.
I think we need someone who's only purpose is to move threads to the cesspool.
And I don't think this should be voted on because it requires an exceptionally sharp eye for mediocrity, the likes of which is hard to come by in the natural world and won't necessarrily be posessed by the most popular person, it would in fact be highly unusual if that was the case (you know, on account of how rare such an eye is).
Fortunately for you, I was blessed with this magic eye and should therefore naturally get the position.
Productivity would increase ten-fold, I don't even need to look inside threads to know they belong in the cesspool, the eye is that damn good. Take this offer, or leave it at your own peril.... ok peril's a strong word, mild discomfort? Yeah, take this offer or leave it at your own mild discomfort :mad:
 
I say we still need a mod for Arts & Culture. We should get one for Free Thoughts to. But on the plus side we got a new super-mod.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top