Should we declare War against Aliens and start World War 3?

[river]

Wrong.

In an ideal world.
Yet here in the real world the percentage is nothing whatsoever like that.

Go on ...

 

[Dywyddyr]

Go on ...

With what?

 

[paddoboy]

↑


Absolutely

Pilots aren't human?

↑
99.99% of the time they better not be confused . Nor Mistaken .

Pilots are trained to fly a plane. They are as much subject to delusions, illusions, mistakes of fast moving or distant objects, troubled minds, near as anyone else is. Certainly much more then your silly unsupported 99.99%
You will get as far with this nonsense as you did with water river.

 

[paddoboy]

With what?

That's river's stand by response when he cannot support his nonsense.

 

[Beer w/Straw]

river, post more my friend.

You are the best!

 

[POVphysics2]

↑


Absolutely



99.99% of the time they better not be confused . Nor Mistaken .

Pilots know what they're doing. They are trained in dog fight maneuvers. If they say they encountered a UFO that was like a dog fight with a craft with superior maneuverability, then they were.

We have our answer to the Drake equation.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Pilots know what they're doing. They are trained in dog fight maneuvers. If they say they encountered a UFO that was like a dog fight with a craft with superior maneuverability, then they were.

Riiight.

We have our answer to the Drake equation.

Wrong.

 

[paddoboy]

river, post more my friend.

You are the best!

shit stirrer!

 

[James R]

Is there anyone else here who might like to have a pleasant discussion about UFO's and ET's?

Well, I'd be up for it, but I'm not getting the impression you've done your homework on that topic to put you in a position to have an intelligent discussion about it. I might be wrong, of course.

You have to realize that the ETs really are brilliant compared to a normal person.

How do you know they are really brilliant? How do you know they exist at all?

We can't have an on topic conversation until the mood of this forum improves.

Why are you here, then?

And if the pilot tells us that the UFO evades them with intelligent maneuvers, then we can rule out Venus, swamp gas, weather balloons, drones and ice crystals. Right?

What you seem to be saying is that we should assume that pilots are perfect observers who never make mistakes. We must also assume that they always report things honestly. Therefore, we must assume that anything they tell us reflects the facts of the matter. Moreover, we should always accept their interpretations of their experiences, without question.

Is that what you're saying?

Honestly, I didn't come here to talk to a fucking moron who is too close minded to talk about it. Why the fuck are you here? This forum has nothing going on. So if I get banned for calling you a moron, I don't care. You are an idiot! You are a moron! Go ahead and report me! YOU ARE RUINING THIS FORUM! I ADVISE THE MODERATORS TO GET RID OF YOU TOO!

You're new here, I guess, so I'll let this one pass this time. You might like to read our forum posting guidelines before you continue posting here.

Pilots know what they're doing. They are trained in dog fight maneuvers.

They presumably know what they are doing when it comes to flying a plane, for the most part. Beyond that, who knows?

If they say they encountered a UFO that was like a dog fight with a craft with superior maneuverability, then they were.

You seem to have an extraordinary amount of confidence in the general competence of pilots as witnesses of unusual events.

Do you think it is impossible for a pilot to ever make a mistaken identification of a UFO? Do you think that most pilot-reported sightings represent real alien spacecraft? If so, why? It's not just because you already believe in alien visitations, is it?