For the non-religious, this book will show how the core practices of spirituality are accessible to all, without the need to subscribe to a religious belief system.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Sheldrake#Origin_and_philosophy_of_morphic_resonanceHow many here know about Sheldrake's thoughts?
Any believers?
Any skeptics?
Sheldrake thus characterises morphic resonance as a convergence between Western and Eastern thought,
Any believers?
I liked this observation;
I can see that those seven practices contribute to mental balance as long as the procedures are not prescribed but left to the individual.For the non-religious, this book will show how the core practices of spirituality are accessible to all, without the need to subscribe to a religious belief system.
He's a kook, but I enjoy reading him.
IMO, science is just beginning to explore the field of mirror neurons, allowing for "empathy" in almost all mammals.Science generally has no explanation for observations of such happenings, and indeed scientific wisdom would suggest there can be no causal reason for them and they are simply flukes and/or people seeing patterns which are not there. Sheldrake, however, has developed the concept of the "morphic field" in an attempt to "explain" them.
https://www.sheldrake.org/research/morphic-resonance/introductionI suggest that morphogenetic fields work by imposing patterns on otherwise random or indeterminate patterns of activity. For example, they cause microtubules to crystallize in one part of the cell rather than another, even though the subunits from which they are made are present throughout the cell.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crystal_structureThe crystal structure and symmetry play a critical role in determining many physical properties, such as cleavage, electronic band structure, and optical transparency.
All possible symmetric arrangements of particles in three-dimensional space may be described by the 230 space groups.
Microtubules: Nature's smartest mesogens — a liquid crystal model for cell division
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311126/For post-mitotic NPCs assembly it is important to consider the vast differences between the fate of the nuclear envelope in different organisms. In S. cerevisiae, the nuclear envelope remains closed throughout mitosis, as the microtubule organizing center (MTOC) is embedded in it
Microtubules are very important in a number of cellular processes. They are involved in maintaining the structure of the cell and, together with microfilaments and intermediate filaments, they form the cytoskeleton. They also make up the internal structure of cilia and flagella.
They provide platforms for intracellular transport and are involved in a variety of cellular processes, including the movement of secretory vesicles, organelles, and intracellular macromolecular assemblies (see entries for dynein and kinesin).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MicrotubuleThey are also involved in cell division (by mitosis and meiosis) and are the major constituents of mitotic spindles, which are used to pull eukaryotic chromosomes apart.
Science generally has no explanation for observations of such happenings
Reported for thread hijacking.Jeez....I'm on a quest..lol
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4311126/
![]()
![]()
![]()
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microtubule
Sorry, if this seems overkill, but I believe this gets really close to the source of the evolutionary processes in living organisms.
Note: I posted this as pertinent to the OP question. IMO, evolution occurs at the micro level and not at the macro level where it may become expressed as observable genetic morphing.
I protest. My post is absolutely pertinent to the OP.Reported for thread hijacking.
Rupert SheldrakeMorphic Resonance: The Nature of Formative Causation.
Write4U:
Your posts on microtubules are off topic.
Since you are apparently obsessed with microtubules, why don't you start a separate, dedicated thread about them? That way you can keep all the microtubule discussion in one place, rather than having it cluttering up threads on other topics.
The Orch R stuff is about a hypothesis proposing quantum processing in the brain. It may be wacky and dismissed by most, but it is at least a scientific hypothesis.I protest. My post is absolutely pertinent to the OP.
Microtubules resonate at a very fundamental level and are responsible for evolutionary processes (morphing) as well as functioning as dynamic external information processors.
Where do you want to start? In the middle?
Maybe it has escaped you before and it just looks to you that I am introducing non-related information thus hijacking the thread. But if you will take a moment to think about it, you will see the relevance of my posts.
Try to keep an open mind allowing for new and developing scientific information.
Rupert Sheldrake
Thanks for the additional info. I realize now that the subject truly deserves its own thread.The Orch R stuff is about a hypothesis proposing quantum processing in the brain. It may be wacky and dismissed by most, but it is at least a scientific hypothesis.
Sheldrake's flaky notions are to do with ESP and alleged collective memory. There is nothing testable at all, just the sort of woolly stuff that Deepak Chopra likes.
There is no connection.
Why not do as James suggests: start a thread on Orch R and microtubules? (But be aware the microtubules are present in numerous biological structures and not by any means just neurons. Try reading this first: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microtubule)