Semantics of "I don't believe in God".

Which one is correct?

  • A

    Votes: 7 38.9%
  • B

    Votes: 3 16.7%
  • C

    Votes: 8 44.4%

  • Total voters
    18

lixluke

Refined Reinvention
Valued Senior Member
A person makes the statement: "I don't believe in God".

What is this person implying?
A. "There is no God. I require sufficient evidence to believe there is a God."

B. "I don't know if there is a God or not. I require sufficient evidence to beleive either way."

C. This person must be implying either A or B only, but it is impossible to tell which one.
 
As a member of a family whose members have been saying that for three generations, I can speak with some authority.

It means, "I don't believe in the existence of gods or a god." There are no implications about evidence or the lack of it, and there's certainly no ambiguity. I was raised in a home where the existence of a god was never discussed, any more than your parents would have brought up the possibility of the existence of Klingons. I was about seven when one of the kids at school started talking about a god, and I laughed uproariously because I quite reasonably assumed he was joking.

It was many years before I got a glimmer of understanding of how and why adults could believe in such a fairytale. By then I was taking science classes in high school and had some comprehension of the scientific method. I was finally able to put my skepticism into words: How can you believe something for which there is no evidence? Wouldn't it be just as "reasonable" to believe that a bucket of money will fall out of the sky and land in your yard?

It was decades later that I learned the Rule of Laplace and was able to defend my skepticism: Extraordinary assertions must be accompanied by extraordinary evidence before anyone is obliged to treat them with respect, so I choose to exercise my right to not treat this most extraordinary hypothesis with respect.
 
A person makes the statement: "I don't believe in God".

What is this person implying?

Hard to speak for others.
My first thought at "I don't believe in God" is "I do not believe God will help me, I am certain God will leave me to rot in misery". Considering some fire and brimstone ideas of what God is like, this is a justified intepretation.
 
It means: "I do not accept that God is a real entity. I see no reason to believe that God is a real entity because of the lack of any sort of evidence and because the concept evades reality".
It does not mean: "God does not exist" or "I believe that God does not exist".
 
If I say God evades reality someone might take it the wrong way.

When you say "God evades reality", I take it that you are saying the concept is irrational. I don't think so.

See my "God is rational" thread in the religion subforum.
 
When you say "God evades reality", I take it that you are saying the concept is irrational. I don't think so.

See my "God is rational" thread in the religion subforum.

Well how suppose God does not evade reality ?
 
Back
Top