i refuse to work with mattmarr unless my salary is doubled and i get an extra 3 weeks off.
You got it! I will throw in a secretary as well.
i refuse to work with mattmarr unless my salary is doubled and i get an extra 3 weeks off.
I did too at first, but some of the changes he made to your articles on there were really awesome.although i have serious reservations about mattmarr.
triple d and unmarried?You got it! I will throw in a secretary as well.
huh? what?I did too at first, but some of the changes he made to your articles on there were really awesome.
triple d and unmarried?
i've added the unofficial editors, contributers, etc, to the main page.
oops, for some reason it didn't stay.
i think i screwed it up.
*IF* you want to format entries in the sciforums wiki properly, you might want to look at the "Harvard System" of Citing and Referencing which I believe is the intending Industrial Standard for citation. Keeping to the same methodology I gather is suppose to make articles clear and presentable to scholars worldwide, however I'm guessing this would only be important on any serious academically noteworthy articles.
What would be good would be to see any such articles not so much "Vandalised" but reformed into the equivalent of an easily digestible text similar to Comic books. (Now you just need some artists to make it a touch above other Wiki's)
but what about the bunny and the lecturesbecause I am quitting hosting spuriousmonkey.com.