Hello,
"Water memory defies conventional scientific understanding of physical chemistry knowledge and is generally not accepted by the scientific community" Wikipedia
It relates to presense of information of active substances in homeooathic remedies in higher solutions/potencies.
I just want to know, whether it is actually tested and then rejected or just rejected becsuse it defies conventional scientific inderstsnding as on that date?
I do not see posdibility of former reason for its rejection.
Since it relates to the understsnding of science, I posted it here for discussions.
Best wishes.
"Water memory defies conventional scientific understanding of physical chemistry knowledge and is generally not accepted by the scientific community" Wikipedia
It relates to presense of information of active substances in homeooathic remedies in higher solutions/potencies.
I just want to know, whether it is actually tested and then rejected or just rejected becsuse it defies conventional scientific inderstsnding as on that date?
I do not see posdibility of former reason for its rejection.
Since it relates to the understsnding of science, I posted it here for discussions.
Best wishes.