SCI FORUM GALLERY - Talent drop-in

thedevilsreject said:
look closer, there does not have to be a nipple to be breast

Im jus sayin that a girl is easily seen if I see a large ass and some real nice breasts. If the girl doesnt have much of an ass and her breasts are hardly seen at all, with microscope perhaps, then it's sort of hard to figure out if its a girl especially from behind. And shoulders are ought to be smaller then guy's.

analyze.bmp
 
Last edited:
Bloody hell, draqon... I knew you were immature, but I didn't know you were blind and bigoted as well! Next you'll be telling us that real men don't eat quiche.

Here's some hard-earned advice:
Get out of the house, meet some real females. Get away from the carefully lit, artifically enhanced model shots, and acquire an appreciation for natural beauty. It's worth it! The virtual girls in your favorites list are not typical, and are polluting your perspecitive with unrealistic stereotypes. The images you see there are blinding you to the beauty of normal people.

It's a big step... perhaps you could use the Dirty Old Men's Association International as a sort of halfway house. I know you'll like today's beauty of the day. Go there for the girls, but be sure to read some things on the Essentials page while you're there. If nothing else, you must read the basic description of "DOMAI Style":
Traditionally there have been only two kinds of nude art: Fine Art Nudes, and erotica. Both have their place in the world, both have important functions, and both should be respected. But ...

... one of [them] sacrificed the model and her beauty for sex, and the other sacrificed the model and her beauty for Art. None of these things are necessarily wrong, but they are not the only options. ...

...Which leads us to the creation of the "third kind" of Nude Art. I like to call it "simple nudes". Some of the models and photographers who are working with it already call it "DOMAI style". This name comes from the primary club and web site which invented and champions this style: DOMAI.com. ...

... The upshot of all this is that Simple Nudes or "DOMAI style" is nude art (usually photographic) which focuses on the beauty of the model, and where the more esoteric artistic qualities of the picture are secondary, and where any sexuality is also secondary. We will here skip the huge and tangled argument of whether it is possible for nude art to be completely asexual. Probably it simply depends on what is put into it by the viewer (and the artist). This is a fascinating question, but not really essential, when we establish that whether sexuality is there or not, it is secondary. Beauty is primary. ...
It is about the beauty of the model. Just as she is. Without having sex or trying to be sexy. Without loads of fancy lingerie or make-up and hair styling. Just herself, nude as she was created. Natural and beautiful. That is "DOMAI style". Or "Simple Nudes".

The newsletter archive is also good reading, liberally spiced with beauty.
 
Last edited:
thedevilsreject said:
look closer, there does not have to be a nipple to be breast

I realize that...but the "lump" that indicates a breast is not bulging out far enough to show its a breast and not a pec or plain fat. A women of this one's build (not tiny) would normally have more breast, which would then show more in her position. I just tested it out myself, and there is definately more of a curve for the breast. But that I guess would only work assuming she has breast that would be typical to her apparent body type.


Note: the "lump" or breast I am refering to is #3 on dragons little sectioning off of the picture.
 
Supposed to be Bush as donald duck...it' missing that black whatever you call it which protrudes from the hat.
 
sargentlard said:
Supposed to be Bush as donald duck...it' missing that black whatever you call it which protrudes from the hat.

Bush is on an awfull diet here...must be pure starvation...those Iraqi's really got to him...
 
That's good sarge is it colored pencil? The black thing is a bill or peak.
Dragon is a fresh reminder that there are quite a few teeny boppers on this forum :p
 
re naked female on front, have you lot not seen female athletes, swimmers or bodybuilders, they have huge shoulders and little breast material. The more they wok out the more 'man like' they become, especially gymnasts infact. Very masculine physique from behind.

Meanwhile re this cartoon sarg...I thought 'minnie' was Prince Charles, dead ringer, more so than Bush.

http://www.princeofwales.gov.uk/gallery-year/2006/060517_order_bath/060517_order_bath.html
 
Sock puppet path said:
That's good sarge is it colored pencil? The black thing is a bill or peak.
:p

Yup, colored pencil...


TOR

Yeah, I kinda see it now. Well, thats what you get when you don't feel like doing hw but have to.
 
whats the point of drawing a woman that looks like a man, when there are so many other beautiful women who look like a woman and have beauty.?
 

A render from POV-Ray that I happen to have with me today. Inspired in part by the Startree in Endymion Rising. I'm thinking maybe smaller loops to make it a little less crowded. I'd like to add leaves, but can't think of an efficient way to do so.
 
I like women with muscles. The kind that don't break when you put a little strain on em. Women that can keep up. I find strength a very attractive trait.
 
ppl comment on the pictures I created, that which I call "art", tell me what you feel when you see them and such... Do they awoke anything at all?
 
Back
Top