Sorry, Michael,
I've been forbidden to pursue this line of inquiry any further on pain of "banning".
This is false.
Write4U received a warning not to post pseudoscience to our Science subforums. He is free to post "alternative" theories to our Alternative Theories subforum, and to discuss pseudoscience in our Pseudoscience forum, for instance.
----
Write4U:
IMO, the speed of light is the fastest possible way reality is able to refresh itself via quantum change.
What does that even mean?
Define "reality", for starters. Then, explain how you can talk about the "speed of reality" and how that relates to the speed of light. While you're at it, trying explaining why reality needs to "refresh" itself, and what exactly goes on when the "refresh" happens. In the process, you'll no doubt have to get more specific about what you mean by "quantum change".
When you write a sentence like that, it can look like it means something, but looks can be deceiving. If you're just pulling some jargon out of the air, you're not doing science.
Quantum change needs time, it cannot happen all at once.
Forget quantum. Change implies time. Where does quantum come into it?
This upper refresh limit turns out to be at SOL, the quantum refresh rate of massless particles.
Now you need to define "quantum refresh rate" and show exactly how it "turns out" as you say. Where can we find the mathematical or theoretical derivation of this result?
I believe this is the foundation for CDT (causal dynamical triangulation), the smallest physical constituent of spacetime.
Here we have a statement of belief, which is all well and good but not science. If this CDT thing is an actual scientific theory, have its authors actually published anything about this "refresh rate" business and so on?
If CDT evolution of spacetime itself cannot exceed SOL what are the implications?
Slow down! Let's get to first base before we proceed to flights of fancy about implications.
The notion struck me that the speed of light is in fact a hard limit for a physical object to retain physical integrity.
I'm not sure what that means.
Did Einstein not say that an object at SOL gains so much mass that theoretically, an object travelling at SOL could not quantum refresh itself, because it would need all the energy in the universe to accomplish that feat.
As far as I am aware, Einstein did not say that. In fact, I think you'll be hard pressed to find a single use of the term "quantum refresh" in any of Einstein's writings. But if you have the relevant quote, feel free to produce it.
But if we consider the power of universal energy...
The power of universal energy???
That would explain the law that the more massive an object is, the more energy it needs and the more time it needs for quantum dynamics and that is controlled and restricted by the speed it can change quantum coordinates, while maintaining physical integrity.
What are quantum coordinates?
This seems to me in agreement to GR as well as SR, and I don't see the concept as overly exotic.....
My impression is that you're having trouble distinguishing between science and vague imaginings of your own.
p.s. this might also lead to a logical conclusion that the BB was a massive singularity travelling at FTL and
just exploding as the BB because it exceeded the limits of "c" and only after slowing to more moderate speeds (through cooling) did the quantum plasma fields gain physical mass eventually expressed as the elements....
That's a
logical conclusion of what you said before, is it? I challenge you, then, to present the line of logical argument that gets us from A to B.
With "refresh" I wanted to indicate the process of quantum change as "a state" becoming regenerated as a "new state".
Regenerated? What does that mean in this context?
Also, at what point do you consider a quantum state to be "new"? Many quantum states evolve continuously. How much change equals "new", or a "regeneration"? And what kind of change?
I believe the expression is that Quantum Mechanics argues for "discrete energy quanta"
Does that not suggets that if light itself propagates via QM that light and reality itself consist of energetic quanta as discrete non-linear packets
It doesn't suggest it as far as I'm concerned.
I don't know what light propagating "via QM" means. I don't know what "reality" means in this context. I don't know what "non-linear" means in this context. To me, the whole thing reads like a bunch of buzz words strung together to make a sentence that sounds like it's scientific.
---
Are you starting to understand why you received a warning for posting pseudoscience to the Science subforums yet?
