Real Reason for Attacking Iraq

L

lixluke

Refined Reinvention
Valued Senior Member
If it is not weapons of mass destruction.
If it is not retaliation to 911 which Iraq had nothing to do with.
Why did America attack Iraq during desert storm?
Why was Bill Clinton trying to use the justification of non-existent weapons of mass destruction to attack Iraq?

We know it is not to take down a dictatorship. There are lots of countries with worse political stryfe than Iraq.

Therefore, what is the real reason America wanted to attack Iraq from the beginning?
Is it true that the government needs to create an enemy just for the sake of having an enemy?
 
The purpose was to shape the battlefield in the middle of the violent and reactionary Islamic world. About time. too!
 
marv said:
The purpose was to shape the battlefield in the middle of the violent and reactionary Islamic world. About time. too!
Click to expand...
Too bad you don't have to unload dead soldiers for a living.
 
right now its the violent democracy taking shape just as genji would like it!!.
its ok for iraqi's to blow themselves up in a market or bus,..but if one little american or non-moslem person kills one of their people, you start to hear a bunch of rheotric from genji's all over the muslim world!!
 
US Government by oil CEOs

Interesting to note that the cultural museum of Baghdad received no protection and the cultural heritage of humankind was looted, but the Iranian oil ministry building was never bombed and was given effective US guard force immediately as priority number 1, before hospitals even, which were also looted.

Answer to your question in a word:

OIL
 
Vega said:
right now its the violent democracy taking shape just as genji would like it!!.
its ok for iraqi's to blow themselves up in a market or bus,..but if one little american or non-moslem person kills one of their people, you start to hear a bunch of rheotric from genji's all over the muslim world!!
Click to expand...
If I ruled Iraq, with my Party, I would execute all religious leaders, demolish all mosques, churches and any structure associated with religion. All quran's and all other religious texts would be confiscated, destroyed & banned. Those that refuse to abort religion in their lives would be sent to re-education camps or killed. See how incredibly far off base you are re: those that dare to disagree with your trolling?
 
Genji said:
If I ruled Iraq, with my Party, I would execute all religious leaders, demolish all mosques, churches and any structure associated with religion. All quran's and all other religious texts would be confiscated, destroyed & banned. Those that refuse to abort religion in their lives would be sent to re-education camps or killed. See how incredibly far off base you are re: those that dare to disagree with your trolling?
Click to expand...
I see, so in other words, just like Israel physically bombarding lebanon right now!,.. your actions in iraq would be translated in a the same similar context. You would be mentally attacking them if you were to go against their religious values and doctrines. You will be hated more than the Israeli's!! :D
 
Vega said:
I see, so in other words, just like Israel physically bombarding lebanon right now!,.. your actions in iraq would be translated in a the same similar context. You would be mentally attacking them if you were to go against their religious values and doctrines. You will be hated more than the Israeli's!! :D
Click to expand...
Liberation from Religion is what the region needs.
 
Vega said:
right now its the violent democracy taking shape just as genji would like it!!.
its ok for iraqi's to blow themselves up in a market or bus,..but if one little american or non-moslem person kills one of their people, you start to hear a bunch of rheotric from genji's all over the muslim world!!
Click to expand...

I make a point to stop reading a post as soon as I read the word "rhetoric".

I bet you like to use "asinine" too, especially in combination with "rhetoric", huh?
 
G. F. Schleebenhorst said:
I bet you like to use "asinine" too, especially in combination with "rhetoric", huh?
Click to expand...
What asinine rhetoric is thi... oh, sorry :eek:
 
I think the US cannot exist without wars or conflict. Because it has created this big mammoth (PENTAGON/FBI/ARMY) it needs to feed...and the hunger is ever growing...Is there any justification for having 20000 Nuclear missiles ..which can destroy the life on earth over 10 times ... no ..Oil cannot be the reason ..because US could have given 1 trillion dollar in tax breaks to Oil companies ...which would have been enough to keep them alive for next 20 years ..This is all because US ( mind you not Bush not democrats) is a slave to the big Military Industrial complex ... you will see many 911s to justify this spending every time there is a cut in defence budget ..this will continue till the CIA and FBI is dismantled from the current form and a more transparent agency is created with check and balances without any black ops funding..
 
cool skill said:
Why was Bill Clinton trying to use the justification of non-existent weapons of mass destruction to attack Iraq?
Click to expand...
As far as I am aware, there WERE WMD there at that time.

cool skill said:
Is it true that the government needs to create an enemy just for the sake of having an enemy?
Click to expand...
It is an effective strategy, is it not?
 
cool skill said:
How so? Please explain.
Click to expand...
You give people something to fear (Communism, Terrorism, Russians, Japanese, what-have-you) - something that is evil, cold, heartless and after what they have.
Then you assure the people that you are protecting them from the big bad wolf, and if it wasn't for you, the big bad wolf will attack them, destroy their homes, kill their children, eat their grandmothers, rape their wives, etc.
Then you back it all up with propaganda to prove you are right.
People are convinced they are in grave danger, and they need you to protect them.
They not only become obediant and loyal to you, they will offer you all that they are afraid of losing to the "enemy" in exchange for your protection.
It has worked over and over again throught history.
 
The breakup of the soviet union and the warschau pact was a big blow to America. They couldn't even take the credit for it. It was accomplished internally.

No enemy left.

It took some adjusting to find new ones.

If I can remember correctly the news media almost immediately started switching to reporting domestic crime violence and such. This brought the idea to the american minds that crime was getting out of control. In reality crime figures had been going down.

Terrorists saved the day.
 
actually, spurious...your first statement is only partially correct.

they couldnt OFFICIALLY take credit for what happened. prior to the ussr's fall, it has been documented and admitted by cia and federal officials that we were buying massive quantities of the soviet currency, and devaluing it.
this was all done under private names, of course.

it is very similar to what the saudis and chinese are doing to the united states today.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top