There's no telling from the abstract what the definition of effective is. Regarding the experts of clear communication, there is no disputing what Dr. Russell Blaylock asserts.
Or we can deal with reality:
Before 1963, approximately 500,000 cases and 500 deaths were reported annually, with epidemic cycles every 2-3 years. However, the actual number of cases was estimated at 3-4 million annually. More than 50% of persons had measles by age 6, and more than 90% had measles by age 15. The highest incidence was among 5-9-year-olds, who generally accounted for more than 50% of reported cases.
In the years following licensure of vaccine in 1963, the incidence of measles decreased by more than 95%, and 2-3-year epidemic cycles no longer occurred. Because of this success, a 1978 Measles Elimination Program set a goal to eliminate indigenous measles by October 1, 1982 (26,871 cases were reported in 1978). The 1982 elimination goal was not met, but in 1983, only 1,497 cases were reported (0.6 cases per 100,000 population), the lowest annual total ever reported up to that time.
Do you still wish to question the efficacy of vaccines?
The number went back up after a twat decided to publish a false report, based on shoddy science to sell his own brand of vaccines. The US went from being at the point of eliminating Measles from the American population to now having large measles outbreaks as being a regular occurrence in society.. And why has it come back? Because people are not vaccinating their children.
And you are still questioning immunisation and worse, quoting and linking quacks in a science sub-forum?
I have personally witnessed extraordinarily unusual trails from airplanes in the sky about a dozen times for a little less than a year now and I'm confident that this is a new phenomena. What is so unbelievable about the hypothesis that our government is attempting to mitigate climate change with environmentally disastrous geoengineering? I have no confidence to believe that the US government knows what they're doing.
Wow..
Do you understand how condensation works? Or, how clouds are made?
Those "unusual trails" are called contrails.
They occur because of the air temperature and humidity.
Contrails (/ˈkɒntreɪlz/; short for "condensation trails") or vapor trails are long, thin artificial clouds that sometimes form behind aircraft. Their formation is most often triggered by the water vapor in the exhaust of aircraft engines, but can also be triggered by changes in air pressure in wingtip vortices or in the air over the entire wing surface.[1] Contrails are made of water in the form of a suspension of billions of liquid droplets or ice crystals.
Depending on the temperature and humidity at the altitude the contrails form, they may be visible for only a few seconds or minutes, or may persist for hours and spread to be several miles wide. The resulting cloud forms may resemble cirrus, cirrocumulus, or cirrostratus, and are sometimes called cirrus aviaticus. Persistent spreading contrails are thought by some, without overwhelming scientific proof, to have a significant effect on global climate.[2] [3]
They are no more poisonous or consist of chemicals than your average cloud floating in the sky.
Dr. Russell Blaylock's assertions seem very scientific and credible to me. His attackers strike me as imbalanced and highly unprofessional.
Blaylock is a quack, pushing bad science that is endangering lives.
I would say that is unprofessional.
Do you realize how many worked on the Manhattan Project and how long that project was a secret? And do you realize how many pilots, doctors & scientists are speaking out against our government attempting to mitigate climate change with environmentally disastrous geoengineering?
Oh dear lord..
The opening paragraph of your source says:
"Russell Blaylock is a trained neurosurgeon who considers himself an expert on nutrition and toxins in food, cookware, teeth, and vaccines. Contrary to the vast bulk of the scientific evidence, Blaylock maintains that vaccines such as the H1N1 vaccine are dangerous or ineffective; that dental amalgams and fluoridated water are harmful to our health; and that aluminum cookware, aspartame, and MSG are toxic substances causing brain damage."
For the record, I've seen numerous documentaries interviewing many scientists that are opposed to fluoridated water and aspartame. The key issue however seems to be that you regard the corruption of science by corporate and government interests to be impossible.
Which is why he is a quack. His claims are not backed by science.
According to
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemtrail_conspiracy_theory, the chemtrail conspiracy theory began to circulate in 1996. So how many insiders do you estimate should know all about it?
I've yet to see a rational explanation for why so many pilots, doctors & scientists are speaking out against chemtrails.
They aren't. Real pilots, doctors and scientists who are not mentally impaired correctly refer to them as contrails.
The doctors, pilots and scientists you are relying on are probably the type to believe that Operation Jade Helm was Obama coming to take the guns from Texans.
It is clear you are somewhat.. well.. I won't say. But it is sufficient to acknowledge that you are a conspiracy theorist who has yet to refer to anything remotely scientific and instead, you are relying on youtube videos. You are not discussing science. You are supporting and encouraging quackery, and yes, supporting the endangering of lives. It is also clear that you have taken this thread to beyond the realms of what is acceptable for the science sub-forums, not to mention you keep driving it off course and you are not even discussing immunisation now, but you are instead diving head first into a brick wall titled 'contrails', not to mention even going in for some anti-fluoride conspiracies and 9/11 ones to boot.
It is possible you are trolling. What is absolutely clear is that you do not belong anywhere near a science sub-forum. Therefore, you shall be relegated to the conspiracy theory sub-forum and you will be very closely monitored.
I would suggest you loosen the tin foil hat because I suspect it is preventing the blood from getting to your brain.