Psychology of Conspiracy Theorists

FatFreddy said:
The bottom line is that when alleged anomalies are presented, they should be analysed using the scientific method*.
Click to expand...
The bottom line is that you have not presented any anomalies, that either give the slightest hint, that the conspiracies you lap up and lie about, are valid, or that hasn't been explained away many times, over many years. You're boring Freddy, and craving for attention.
FatFreddy said:
If you people were using the scientific method, you wouldn't be using all of this hogwash to avoid analysing post #632. Your avoiding it makes it seem like you know it's good solid evidence that the missions were faked and you're trying to bury it to reduce the number of viewers who see it. If you're sincere truth-seekers, address what I said in post #632.
Click to expand...
Because you're a nobody Freddy, lapping up nonsense, that has all been done and dusted, many times.
Facts are, as history rightly recalls, we went to the Moon, landed, and walked on its surface.
Your continued lying about any other possibility, is psychotic driven nonsense, that you should seek attention for.
 
FatFreddy said:
They wouldn't just laugh you out of the debating hall for this stand. They'd throw you out.
Click to expand...
What gives you any idea that you and your ilk would be ever allowed in any respectable debating hall...talk about delusions of grandeur Freddy...you have it bad son!:rolleyes:
 
billvon said:
If you understood the scientific method you would not say such foolish things. (Hint - the scientific method is not "if I don't understand it, it must be a hoax.")
Click to expand...
cue from Freddy: We are all sophist pigs, making excuses for the troofers, trying there best to right the wrongs of society!!


crazy-cuckoo-man-28964603.jpg
 
FatFreddy said:
They haven't been debunked. The "debunkers" look silly when they try to obfuscate the anomalies.

Check this out.
https://www.apollohoax.net/forum/index.php?topic=1118.15
Click to expand...
FatFreddy said:
You can pretend all you want. You all looked silly here.
Click to expand...
Well at last! Some truth, except of course, as your banning elsewhere shows, and your reception here shows, it is painfully obvious you are the silly billy!!;)
:D
paddoboy said:
The excellent article on the subject of these nutty ratbags conspiracy theorists that walk amongst us concludes thus............................

But another thing is true about the Moon landings: You’ll never convince someone who wants to think they were faked that they weren’t. There is nothing in particular you could ever say, no particular moment or piece of evidence you could produce, that would cause someone like that to light up and say, “Oh! You’re right! We did go to the Moon.”

Anyone who wants to live in a world where we didn’t go to the Moon should be happy there. That’s a pinched and bizarre place, one that defies not just the laws of physics but also the laws of ordinary human relationships.

I prefer to live in the real world, the one in which we did go to the Moon, because the work that was necessary to get American astronauts to the Moon and back was extraordinary. It was done by ordinary people, right here on Earth, people who were called to do something they weren’t sure they could, and who then did it, who rose to the occasion in pursuit of a remarkable goal.

That’s not just the real world, of course. It’s the best of America.

We went to the Moon, and on the 50th anniversary of that first landing, it’s worth banishing forever the nutty idea that we didn’t, and also appreciating what the achievement itself required, and what it says about the people who were able to do it.
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Click to expand...
 
FatFreddy said:
You can pretend all you want. You all looked silly here.
Click to expand...
I am not worried about someone reading my replies to you - and thinking that I am the silly looking one.

But you just keep having your fantasies about you ever seeing the inside of a university, never mind having a debate. In your mind, are you the brave, out of the box thinker combating the narrowminded establishment? Like Einstein, they will laugh at you until they realize how brilliant you are for not accepting basic science? If so dream away; at least you have a fantasy life to entertain yourself.
 
FatFreddy said:
They haven't been debunked. The "debunkers" look silly when they try to obfuscate the anomalies.
Click to expand...
And yet to repeat myself Freddy, history will rightly show the facts that NASA took man to the Moon, landed him safely, and returned him back to Earth. That will still be recorded historical fact, tomorrow, next year, ten years from now, and a thousand years from now, if we are still here.
 
billvon said:
I am not worried about someone reading my replies to you - and thinking that I am the silly looking one.
Click to expand...
You're only worried about whether you get paid.

https://www.clubconspiracy.com/counter-intellegience-tricks-and-techniques-t4702.html
(excerpt)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6) An odd kind of "artificial" emotionalism and an unusually thick skin -- an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and non-acceptance. This likely stems from intelligence community training that, no matter how condemning the evidence, deny everything, and never become emotionally involved or reactive. The net result for a disinfo artist is that emotions can seem artificial. Most people, if responding in anger, for instance, will express their animosity throughout their presentation. But disinfo types usually have trouble maintaining the "image" and are hot and cold with respect to emotions they pretend to have and the more calm or normal communications which are not emotional. It's just a job, and they often seem unable to "act their role in type" as well in a communications medium as they might be able in a real face-to-face conversation/confrontation. You might have outright rage and indignation one moment, ho-hum the next, and more anger later -- an emotional yo-yo. With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job, and they will generally continue their old disinfo patterns without any adjustments to criticisms of how obvious it is that they play that game -- where a more rational individual who truly cares what others think might seek to improve their communications style, substance, and so forth.
 
FatFreddy said:
You're only worried about whether you get paid.
Click to expand...
Like your idiotic conspiracy nonsense, more rhetorical, baseless nonsense to prop up your stupidity.

FatFreddy said:
6) An odd kind of "artificial" emotionalism and an unusually thick skin -- an ability to persevere and persist even in the face of overwhelming criticism and non-acceptance. With respect to being thick-skinned, no amount of criticism will deter them from doing their job,
Click to expand...

That's rather common news with fools and idiots Freddy, and why such idiots should get a psychiatric examination as they can be a danger to society. :rolleyes:
 
Someone should advise Fat Freddie to watch movie First Man

Big stuff up. This is not a recent movie ie 2018. Was one of the movies made before the fake attempt

Guess what they didn't put in the movie? Forget about the flag waving. They didn't put in THE PLANTING

How about that?

:)
 
Not a single person seems to agree with you, Freddy.
Isn't that weird how we're all paid sophists?
 
FatFreddy said:
http://putlockers.fm/watch/QG3AQjvo-first-man.html

I skipped to the part where the Saturn 5 rocket was taking off. There was nothing enlightening in it. It was just the official story. It had some spooky music and some good scenes so it has some propaganda value.
Click to expand...
Obviously as per the paper on conspiracy nuts and their nutty beliefs, I presented earlier, you will never be convinced of the facts, due to a probably psychotic condition and other questionable qualities in your questionable makeup.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top