The following 'dialogue' consists of responses to the original starting post on the issued thread:
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=69650&page=5
----------------------------
Dude, I never saw you before this forum.
And I really don't care about you now.
I don't give a rat's ass about you or your problems at this point.
I do not want to hear about you or your problems anymore, I do not want to see hide nor hair of you, I don't want to share geography with you.
If you're going to threaten to publish my IP, name, and home address you're threatening me
I told you what I thought of you pretty bluntly, but I never threatened you.
Go fuck yourself with a sledgehammer, and be sure not to use lube..
-----------------------------------
Firstly, chimpkin, you were not threatened at all (you do specify:
If you're going to threaten to publish my IP, name, and home address
you're threatening me), whereas, posters on the subjected thread were reminded of the recently activated (U.S. Constitution sacking) 'Home Security' and 'Patriot' acts, which empower 'government' to tap anyone's phone and/or place anyone on satellite TV facilitated reconnaisance,24/7/365, without a judge's order or 'due cause'.
No. You didn't threaten me, neither did I say that you had (invaded my privacy, or, threatened to do so).
Whereas, your elaborately inflammatory and provocative language and epithets are disregarded, as reflections on your character.
_________________
“ He's largely incoherent and eminently ignorable. ” - Dyw
chimpkin's response to Dyw:
"Incoherent I agree with.
I perceive him as somewhat of a threat now...not sure how much, very much not wanting to find out how much of a threat.
I don't like threats."
----------------------
Your above statement, chmpkin,
clarifies a perception that you have, or had, going on to say furthermore that you are not sure how much, and that you don't want to find out how much...
------------------------------------
The following quote is excerpted from Me-Ki-Gal's post #59 of the issued thread:
"I am going to change human perception based on this very idea . The V formation is being built as we speak in more ways than one for Golly gee mister wizard I learned the law of rumors and how through underground networking not based in media blitzing information can be transmitted by hypnotic suggesting."
Me-Ki-Gal closes this post with:
"What you gonna do , What you gonna do when they come for you?"
Is that not a threat?
"Especially in the wake of Randwolf's closure of post #46 in the same thread: "O'course, paranoid does not preclude real enemies pursuing you..."
Is that not a threat?
------------------
In post # 60 of the issued thread, is my qualified statement:
"Any further epithets, cryptically veiled threats or other (continued) denigrating gesticulations directed this way - by whomever - will only add more diabolically motivated dishonor (and a lot more intel than your mere isp coordinates, addresses and phone numbers) to the unfolding history..."
The 'intel' alluded to very specifically does not state that thread participants will fall under the (Orwellian) auspices or contingencies of the so-called 'Homeland Security' or 'Patriot' acts. Ostensibly, I certainly don't have the wherewithal or influence to carry out what is - however tentatively - alluded to as 'threat'. What I did say and intend is that everyone on this -
or any other - portion of the internet, is subject to the anti-Constitutionally installed Homeland Security and Patriot acts. Particularly when it involves the emergence of elements of the self-declared (fugitive) ROFACO. That is my (documented/manifest) story, and I am sticking to it.
chimpkin's response to the above quoted excerpt is post #61 from the issued thread
http://www.sciforums.com/showthread.php?t=69650&page=5
"So you are internet stalking sciforums members now?
While I understand that this info can be had if you really want it?
I find it very creepy and threatening that you actually would do so.
As well as an extremely dishonorable act.
You could insult me all day and I would not invade your privacy, or even threaten to do so."
-----------------------------------------------------
Post #62: followed chimpkin's above post:
Bob's Big Boy
The Best Burger in Town (0 posts)
04-29-11, 08:44 AM #62
"This is some thread here, boy. Some of these posts make me totally ROFACO."
---------------------------------
As expressed in post #48 of
this thread, what Me-Ki-Gal describes as 'rumor'... "through underground networking not based in media blitzing information can be transmitted by hypnotic suggesting..."
Corresponds with 'Bob's Big Boy' declaration that:
"Some of these posts make me totally ROFACO."
Firstly, that statement is tantamount to a public confession, since no one can 'make' the author of that post anything he hasn't or doesn't make himself.
Whereas, the emergence & motive of 'Bob's Big Boy' (BBB, post #62) in the issued thread is also revealed (above) in post #48 of this thread.
What BBB establishes in his 'Best Burger in Town' post is
A) the acronymic ROFACO (Robertson Family Conspiracy) is still active; and, which
B) places the author of that ('Bob's Big Boy' <Robert's son> ) post in the legal jurisdiction of Title 18 of the Federal code ('conspiracy') - the qualification that no matter how extended a felony vehicularized by so called 'rumor' is, all statutes of limitation are nullified: as long as the originator and/or accessories to that felony are still active.
Moreover, the author of the post subjected in this paragraph, along with no less than scores of accessories, did specifically state on the internet, many times in many ways (between December 03 & September 04), that I am a physical threat to women and children. That hatesite was ordered down in a court of law, while its (feloniously 'rumored') connotations
('Terrorism': "the use of force or threats to intimidate, etc., especially as a political policy. Intense fear; that which causes intense fear". Webster's. All and much more of these definitions were repeatedly and diversely projected on myself and my wife by the self-maintaining 'ROFACO') continue - internationally and indefinitely - as 'inspiration' to untold numbers of criminal individuals and groups, thereby generating and maintaining a physical threat against myself and my qualified family and friends.
The described condition was in fact applied to and vehicularized upon the internet, and, consequently, is being counter-stated and identified by way of the same communications medium, in this notable case, enabled by the grace of Sciforum adminstrators.
That is what is qualified in my post that:
"Any further epithets, cryptically veiled threats or other (continued) denigrating gesticulations directed this way - by whomever - will only add more diabolically motivated dishonor (and a lot more intel than your mere isp coordinates, addresses and phone numbers) to the unfolding history..."
It allows for the possibility that the entire thread, or any part of it, may in fact be overseen, evaluated and/or traced; it does not say that is occurring.
I have no power whatsoever to control what 'the powers that be' may or not be doing with this or that post, thread or forum, on this - or any other part - of the net; while most people are in fact aware that such powers exist and comparatively diminish the powers of the public internet to a relatively archaic status (the Reader is invited to refer to the example of technological resources at point in:
http://forums.delphiforums.com/mollyspup/messages/?msg=2.1 )
On the other hand, in light of the
Homeland Security and
Patriot acts, such reconnaissance is in fact a real and incumbent technology, and, since the poster of the 'Bob's Big Boy' missive, that individual has in fact boldly 'made himself' a high priority candidate for being targeted - as a fugitive, active element of his acronymic usage: 'ROFACO', while further identifying his (supposedly unaccountable and 'anonymous') self.
(Segue to 'You Light Up My Life'?)
Post Script:
Certainly I have taken note of the remarkable fact that the moderators and admistration personnel of Sciforums have reinstated my privilege of posting new threads, etceteras...
This unexpected allowance truly humbles me, and surely speaks volumes of cerebral and moral liberation not often seen in any number of other internet forums (all and any of which reserve the unrestricted right to disregard the 1st Amendment, when and if applicable).
The theme of this thread:
"
Protecting Non-violent Hate Speech' evokes a very thought provoking series of responses, not unrelated to the incumbent issue at hand. Localized, national and international social dynamics are in accented transition, often regarding dysfunctional government and individuals (refer the book titles, 'Future Shock', and 'The Third Wave', by Alvin Tofler) - an authoritative source alerted me to becoming aware that there are two ways to go bonkers: #1. Acknowledge factually confirmed reality, or, #2. Deny it. Either way challenges the test individual in the laboratory of reality at large. I choose the former - #1. - school of thought.
Sincere gratitude to kororoti for initiating this important thread, and to the administrators of Sciforums, certainly including senior moderator, Tiassa.
I am respectfully,
K. B. Robertson (etceteras)
