Proposal: That the current global warming trend has nothing to do with human actions.

Edufer:

Please read the rules of the Formal Debates forum. A Proposal thread is not the place to debate. See the sticky threads that explain how this works.

Regarding this particular proposal thread, my offer to debate Buffalo Roam expired 7 days after I posted the first post. I might be willing to debate a similar topic with you at some stage, but in the lead up to Christmas I am quite busy with other things and I don't think I can devote the time to doing this properly right now.
 
Edufer said:
cycles.jpg


The 8 years around 1998 show a very low rate of change, indeed we think the negative slope is becoming evident. In a couple more years, that should become even more evident. By 2015, global warming will be a thought of the past, but some may anticipate the high rate of negative climate change is due to HUMAN ACTIVITY.

John Shotsky[/COLOR][/INDENT]
Click to expand...

If your theory is correct, your timing is sure off! 1998 was nine years ago and the warming trend is STILL continuing upwards - ever since then and until this very day.
 
James R said:
Regarding this particular proposal thread, my offer to debate Buffalo Roam expired 7 days after I posted the first post. I might be willing to debate a similar topic with you at some stage, but in the lead up to Christmas I am quite busy with other things and I don't think I can devote the time to doing this properly right now.
Click to expand...
You might be willing at "some stage"? What happened to this guy:
James R said:
None of our resident global-warming deniers were brave enough to take up my challenge, I see.
Click to expand...
Edufer responded to you the next day! Then, suddenly, it's too late to debate. No time! Can't do it right now! So one day, you're taunting the "resident global-warming deniers", and the very next day; there's no time for a debate?
 
Correct. As I explained quite clearly, my time is limited. I specified a time frame.
 
Well, let's hope that you two can come to an arrangement. This forum has been less than a rousing success so far.
 
Few people are willing to put in the requisite time and effort, invert. (I don't see you volunteering, by the way...)

Still, I'm happy to leave this one on a slow burn for a while.
 
I'm far too chaotic for this sort of thing. Most sciforumers are, methinks. Hence the poor ratings in here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top