If the g o single d exists he should file a restraining order on you.
If the g o single d exists he should file a restraining order on you.
Well that definitely establishes FF as the more rational one. Boy that's a really low standard you fail to meet.
Of course you would. It is, after all your delusion.I'd take my evidence any day over Fat Freddy's.
So what does it do? And how would you distinguish between between it doing things and nature doing things?The one and only.
Reality.
You can also count the 3 O's (omnipotence, omnipresence and omniscience.)
Yet to be shown.How about "e" - existent.
So what does it do? And how would you distinguish between between it doing things and nature doing things?
Sounds like pareidolia. Would someone else in the room have had the same interpretation?
Then you can do better?
Oh yes, definitely. It was a truly unique occurrence. And objective too. I was actually witnessing the lighting in the room corresponding to the good and bad thoughts I was having. And the feeling I had was great/ ineffable. The feeling and the influencing of the light went hand in hand. But I've also noticed the lighting change even when I did not have the feeling of ineffability.
I renamed my cat God.
I smoke weed too!
My whole existence is dedicated to proving the unseen.
Weed makes you experience spiritual reality?
'Proving the unseen' to whom?
Just you? If so, then why do you post here? Why do you try to involve all of the rest of us in things that are private only to you?
Or are you hoping to prove (whatever it is that you want to prove) to us too?
If that's what you want to do, then you will have to actually communicate with other people. You will have to say things that make sense to them and not just to you.
You will have to explain your ideas and give people some idea what you are trying to say. And you will have to give people some persuasive reasons why they should think that you might be right.
If you hope to provide a 'proof', or even a sound argument, you will have to tell people not only what your conclusions are, but also how you arrived at them. People need to know what your initial assumptions were, and why those assumptions are plausible. And people need to know how your conclusions follow logically from your assumptions.
I pet God in such states.
Oh yes, definitely. It was a truly unique occurrence. And objective too.
I was actually witnessing the lighting in the room corresponding to the good and bad thoughts I was having.
And the feeling I had was great/ ineffable. The feeling and the influencing of the light went hand in hand. But I've also noticed the lighting change even when I did not have the feeling of ineffability.
That sounds subjective, since your feelings are subjective.Oh yes, definitely. It was a truly unique occurrence. And objective too. I was actually witnessing the lighting in the room corresponding to the good and bad thoughts I was having. And the feeling I had was great/ ineffable. The feeling and the influencing of the light went hand in hand. But I've also noticed the lighting change even when I did not have the feeling of ineffability.
'Proving the unseen' to whom?
Just you? If so, then why do you post here? Why do you try to involve all of the rest of us in things that are private only to you?
Or are you hoping to prove (whatever it is that you want to prove) to us too?
If that's what you want to do, then you will have to actually communicate with other people. You will have to say things that make sense to them and not just to you.
You will have to explain your ideas and give people some idea what you are trying to say. And you will have to give people some persuasive reasons why they should think that you might be right.
If you hope to provide a 'proof', or even a sound argument, you will have to tell people not only what your conclusions are, but also how you arrived at them. People need to know what your initial assumptions were, and why those assumptions are plausible. And people need to know how your conclusions follow logically from your assumptions.