People we miss

Status
Not open for further replies.
Bores to snores. Bored to snored. Borzez to snorzez.
That's making me feel tired. Yawn.

Anyway,
What became of Cluelusshusbund?

Not heard of since 12-06-10 at 11:55 PM..

Actually, Cluelesshusband left a visitor message and befriended me on
07-31-11 10:47 AM.

He also left a couple of visitor messages on his own profile page on 07-30-11 as per this link.

http://www.sciforums.com/member.php?u=43960
 
I am seriously conflict adverse, having been raised in a house divided and frightened by loud arguing and domestic violence as a child.

In my house I was the designated frustration target and general punching bag, so, me too...
Unless, as Incompatibilist did, you catch me when I forgot to go get any of my three happy pills and I'm feeling combative.

I've heard repeatedly that I am not the real me on meds...the real me is an evil b**ch that nobody likes then...let's stick with medded me.

Clueless was talking to me and friended me...apparently the reason why he doesn't post on the main forum is his horrible spelling was going to earn him a permaban.
So he messages people instead, that way he can still kind of participate.
 
not me. I want to see her gorgeous beetles

hehe heh hehehehe heheh

CDSC08927.jpg
 
...apparently the reason why he doesn't post on the main forum is his horrible spelling was going to earn him a permaban.
So he messages people instead, that way he can still kind of participate.

are you serious?! I wonder if Asguard got the same warning
 
Actually, my target audience is anyone who reads and responds in more than one sentence, and less than a novel, so I do understand why some of my posts bore you to snores, lol....:D

Come on that's rather simplistic. You wouldn't judge an audience based solely on post size. If you did, I'd fit if I did this:


Bla blabla blabla blabla yukon blablabla blabla blabla graveyard shift blablabla blablabla blablabla blabla blabla blablabla blabla blabla blablabla blabla blabla blablabla blabla blabla blablabla blabla blabla yukonblablabla blabla blabla blablabla blabla blabla graveyard shift in the yukon blablabla blabla blabla blablabla blabla blabla blablabla blabla blabla. Bblablabla blabla blabla blablabla blabla blabla yukon yukon graveyard shift.
 
In my house I was the designated frustration target and general punching bag, so, me too...
Unless, as Incompatibilist did, you catch me when I forgot to go get any of my three happy pills and I'm feeling combative.

I've heard repeatedly that I am not the real me on meds...the real me is an evil b**ch that nobody likes then...let's stick with medded me.

There's a good side in being an evil bitch. People leave you alone.
 
If anyone ever called me a bitch in real life, I wold say "I am not! you jerk" then I would cry
 
If anyone ever called me a bitch in real life, I wold say "I am not! you jerk" then I would cry

Medded me would say "I'm sorry you feel that way."

Unmedded me would say something that would get removed from here, including where to go and probably precise directions on how to get there, make general aspersions to parents, genetic background, genitalia size, brain capacity and so on as inappropriate, and in real life would likely throw things(recliners a possibility) and demonstrate why I didn't need to use a bullhorn at protests.:eek:

My wife used to take medication and now does not...she's...never been a very restrained sort of person anyway.

BTW thanks for the beetlerotica, Varda...very tasteful
 
Last edited:
SAM:

I'm going with extraordinary assertions require extraordinary evidence. You think he should make a public apology for "his appalling behaviour". Do enlighten us as to this behaviour which was not considered appalling enough to be banworthy until HE requested a ban but necessitates an apology to unban him.

I told you - go look for yourself. Gustav handily provided you to a link to the thread where spuriousmonkey made his exit from the forum.

Besides, you were there. Don't you remember?

Yes I remember that. I thought it was a pity that Ron(perplexity), implanck, ToR and satyr were not given a chance - all of them were superlative posters in their chosen fields of interest.

All of them were given many many chances.

I am getting very sick of your outright lies. You're attempting to re-write history here. I know that the vast majority of posters reading what you write won't go back and search through old threads to see the truth, so what you are doing is essentially trying to undermine the administrators here by posting outright lies. That is rather despicable, to say the least.

I was not surprised that the monkey was put aside because of the Ego of the Person Involved. There is a tendency in sci to put aside legitimate posters who post really thought provoking stuff by putting them into pigeonholes based on their personalities while dismissing their contributions. Its the exact reverse of how science actually works.

By "the Person Involved" you obviously mean me. The record shows, however, that spuriousmonkey was "put aside" solely due to his own actions on the forum. And in terms of "persons involved", there was more than just one moderator/admin involved in that decision, so your personal vendetta angle doesn't ring true.

If you note, almost all of those posters were banned after prolonged pissing contests which had nothing to do with their better posts but due to trolling and baiting them on personal issues or by labelling them as "mental cases" or misogynists or kooks - many were hounded into bans.

Of course people aren't banned for their "better posts". They are banned for the posts that break the site rules, that are offensive and insulting to other members, that constitute trolling etc. Obviously.

I am only interested in the monkeys because three years of holding a grudge over someone like spurious is just too childish for words - his contributions far outweigh one hissy fit over mod issues where HE asked for a ban.

Looking at the thread Gustav linked, you're actually talking about events that happened in 2007 - that's four years ago.

spuriousmonkey doesn't want to come back here. And he doesn't need you to drag up dead issues in a weak attempt to rewrite history for your own purposes.

There is a lack of graciousness in these forums which comes from an inability to move past personal issues and appreciate people for who they are rather than who we think they should be.

You said it. Just look at yourself.

give it another shot, james
spurious can directly apologize to sciforums for the vandalism and whatnot here in this thread or by pm

There has been no contact between spuriousmonkey and the administration here for years. Clearly, he doesn't want to come back. He doesn't require you to drag him back here any more than he requires SAM to drag him back.

Let it go. Move on.
 
As I said, I would let sniffy and Varda have the last word in their replies to me before closing the thread. They have now done that.

In closing, I invite anybody who is interested in the truth about spuriousmonkey's exit from sciforums to start at his user profile, here:

http://www.sciforums.com/member.php?u=7353

From there, search for all threads started by him. Read a random selection of the last 30 or so threads started by spuriousmonkey. And bear in mind that these were his contributions only to threads that he started.

If you want to see more, trying viewing his individual posts to other threads, which again are linked from his profile page.

This thread is now closed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top