What indiscriminate pro-immigration policies, and uncontrolled reproduction means is a process of Dysgenics.
In the first case, thousands of years of evolution, and near extinction, having selected certain traits, is lost by dilution.
In the second, thousands of years of monogamy, humanism, have permitted dysfunctional genes to propagate, lowering the quality of the whole.
"If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, it is now possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without them knowing it." - Bernays, Edward
His daughter in the B.B.C. documentary Century of Self commented that her father’s favorite insult was “stupid”…and he knew stupid very well, because molding stupidity was his art.
Even the modern-day intelligentsia act and react in accordance with prescribed cultural standards and stupidity is offered a moniker of civility that enables it to flourish as an alternative to intelligence; they bury their heads in numbers and statistics while the world around them burns, and like Archimedes scream out
"Μη μου τους κυκλους μου ταρατε." as a Roman plunges a sword into them.
"Like dreams, statistics are a form of wish fulfillment. " - Baudrillard, Jean
Specialization, as it appears in modern systems is a form of socialized autism.
It is also known by other terms denoting a social dysfunction: nerd, geek.
With massive information influx, focussed intelligence has become a necessity, given the complexity of different fields of study.
This focus comes at a price.
The mind can be exceptional within one context, one field of human interest, and be, simultaneously, completely inept, or wanting, in all other areas.
We might describe this socialized autism as a byproduct of modern life, producing idiot savants.
If we combine Dysgenics with Socialized Autism we might begin to understand how intelligence can be declining while most of us would consider it on the rise.
Declining IQ's, focused obsessively will appear as genius in the particular area of interest.
We can be surrounded by geniuses, idiot savants, who, at the same time, lack the Daemonion of the ancients.
If we explore the reasons for Dysgenics, beyond Lynn's analysis, such as sheltering, reproductive rights, a shaming of judging and discrimination, technologies compensating or substituting human efforts, and we combine it with the modern day need to achieve within demanding fields, we might begin to understand what is happening.
Not only do higher IQ women on average have fewer children that lower IQ ones, but when discrimination has become "immoral", monogamy forced due to cultural and socioeconomic conventions, then the "intelligent female" who might have chosen differently, is infected by a mimetic standard, a virus, an ideal, that warps her judgments, or forces her to make compromises, sometimes conflicting with her genetic predispositions - the adaptation of the feminine role to modern utilities.
The female's genetic filtering role can now be appropriated and adapted to serve as a mimetic filtering mechanism.
This is where the feminine "mystique" stems from: this contradiction between words, ideals, and actions - a conflict between gene and meme where the meme is nihilistic.
The conflict is dealt with by a form of self-hypnosis: compartmentalization, selective reasoning...a schism of the psyche (schizophrenia).
This is how Paternalism resulted in its own demise. Technologies/Techniques, ideas being techniques, used in male competition for dominance eventually result in this decadence, this utility as a compensation for a weakness.
A strength wanting to remain on-top seeds the circumstances of its own future atrophy.
Paternalism always represented the worse kind of authority for the female sex.
It took away the female's natural role as the filtering system of natural selection, and placed it in the hands of males.
And still, to this day, those females happy that this power has been returned to them, do not question why or how, when no power has ever been given up once it has been taken.
Not much blood shed, no big war fought...not much of anything but some hippie get-togethers and talk about love's high.
The mystery is partially solved when one explores the possibility that power was never returned to them or to anybody.
What changed, gradually, was the methods being used to enforce and apply this power.
Natural selection was the natural force, that immutable past, they could not alter, but only nudge along, ride, manipulate, as man has been doing with nature for centuries.
Sexual roles give way to gender roles, tribalism gives way to social classes, and nationalism, and natural selection gives way to social selection - genes to memes.
After all, man domesticated bovines not by altering their nature, but by exploiting and manipulation what nature was already present in the species...which is no more than the manifestation of an evolutionary history.
Nihilism, whatever name and form it takes in these most modern times, is this rejection of the past.
Why force a cow to produce milk, holding her captive behind fences, when you can exploit her natural antipathy for her own past, and her normal ambition to become more than its limiting determinators, when you can make her feel proud for being the best milk producing cow in the barn, free to come and go as she pleases, but more happy to remain within the farm's boundaries?
Evola, Julius wrote:
"America ... has created a 'civilization' that represents an exact contradiction of the ancient European tradition. It has introduced the religion of praxis and productivity; it has put the quest for profit, great industrial production, and mechanical, visible, and quantitative achievements over any other interest. It has generated a soulless greatness of a purely technological and collective nature, lacking any background of transcendence, inner light, and true spirituality. America has [built a society where] man becomes a mere instrument of production and material productivity within a conformist social conglomerate."
Evola, Julius wrote:
"The United States represents the reductio ad absurdum of the negative and the most senile aspects of Western civilization. What in Europe exist in diluted form are magnified and concentrated in the United States whereby they are revealed as the symptoms of disintegration and cultural and human regression. The American mentality can only be interpreted as an example of regression, which shows itself in the mental atrophy towards all higher interests and incomprehension of higher sensibility. The American mind has limited horizons, one conscribed to everything which is immediate and simplistic, with the inevitable consequence that everything is made banal, basic and leveled down until it is deprived of all spiritual life. Life itself in American terms is entirely mechanistic. The sense of I in America belongs entirely to the physical level of existence. The typical American neither has spiritual dilemmas nor complications: he is a natural joiner and conformist."
And the exploration of reality has ceased to be a venture to know, so as to challenge its authority
over existence, but has now turned into a practice of discovering so as to best surrender to what we wish to belong to, without causing too much of a fuss.
Bernays, Edward wrote:
"Universal literacy was supposed to educate the common man to control his environment. Once he could read and write he would have a mind fit to rule. So ran the democratic doctrine. But instead of a mind, universal literacy has given him rubber stamps, rubber stamps inked with advertising slogans, with editorials, with published scientific data, with the trivialities and the tabloids and the platitudes of history, but quite innocent of original thought.
Each man’s rubber stamps are the duplicates of millions of others, so that when those millions are exposed to the same stimuli, all received identical imprints. It may seem an exaggeration to say that the American public gets most of its ideas in this wholesale fashion.
The mechanism by which ideas are disseminated on a large scale is propaganda, in the broad sense of an organized effort to spread a particular belief or doctrine."