On Nothing in a void.

Sure I do river....... :)
Galaxies are made up of stars river. :)
Like I said, according to our best observational theory, galaxies were formed in the early universe when huge conglomerations of dust etc, collapsed under gravity, breaking into segments to form individual stars......

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy_formation_and_evolution

The study of galaxy formation and evolution is concerned with the processes that formed a heterogeneous universe from a homogeneous beginning, the formation of the first galaxies, the way galaxies change over time, and the processes that have generated the variety of structures observed in nearby galaxies.

Galaxy formation is hypothesized to occur, from structure formation theories, as a result of tiny quantum fluctuations in the aftermath of the Big Bang. The simplest model for this that is in general agreement with observed phenomena is the Λ-Cold Dark Matter cosmology; that is to say that clustering and merging is how galaxies gain in mass, and can also determine their shape and structure.

So stars make the galaxy ? In your opinion .
 
So stars make the galaxy ? In your opinion .
Stars make up galaxies yes, in the opinion of all astronomers, scientists, cosmologists and of course me ;): Oh as well as planets, comets, asteroids;
Remember, it is gravity that has shaped the matter/mass/energy in universe we see. :smile:
 
Stars make up galaxies yes, in the opinion of all astronomers, scientists, cosmologists and of course me ;): Oh as well as planets, comets, asteroids;
Remember, it is gravity that has shaped the matter/mass/energy in universe we see. :smile:

You missed two critical words

Sort of

:)
 
Stars make up galaxies yes, in the opinion of all astronomers, scientists, cosmologists and of course me ;): Oh as well as planets, comets, asteroids;
Remember, it is gravity that has shaped the matter/mass/energy in universe we see. :smile:

Not only remember ; gravity ; but is basic to BB .
 
Not only remember ; gravity ; but is basic to BB .
Remember that the BB theory is a theory of the evolution of space and time river, [spacetime] from a hotter, denser state, and the four known forces were combined as one Superforce, until t+10-43 seconds when expansion of spacetime sees the Superforce start to decouple and the first basic constituents of matter formed.
 
Remember that the BB theory is a theory of the evolution of space and time river, [spacetime] from a hotter, denser state, and the four known forces were combined as one Superforce, until t+10-43 seconds when expansion of spacetime sees the Superforce start to decouple and the first basic constituents of matter formed.

Theory ; BB is a theory .
 
Theory ; BB is a theory .
A scientific theory river, and you have been told many times what a scientific theory means and entails river. :rolleyes::p;)

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.06112v1.pdf
The big-bang theory: construction, evolution and status
20 Jun 2016
Abstrac
t. Over the past century, rooted in the theory of general relativity, cosmology has developed a very successful physical model of the universe: the big-bang model. Its construction followed different stages to incorporate nuclear processes, the understanding of the matter present in the universe, a description of the early universe and of the large scale structure. This model has been confronted to a variety of observations that allow one to reconstruct its expansion history, its thermal history and the structuration of matter. Hence, what we refer to as the big-bang model today is radically different from what one may have had in mind a century ago. This construction changed our vision of the universe, both on observable scales and for the universe as a whole. It offers in particular physical models for the origins of the atomic nuclei, of matter and of the large scale structure. This text summarizes the main steps of the construction of the model, linking its main predictions to the observations that back them up. It also discusses its weaknesses, the open questions and problems, among which the need for a dark sector including dark matter and dark energy
 
Ahh c'mon Mick!;)

You don't sort of remember sort of Babbling Brook sort of does not sort of believe in the sort of real world.

Poe is sort of confused about what is sort of being posted.

:)(<<< sort of Poe sort of listening.
 
Last edited:
A scientific theory river, and you have been told many times what a scientific theory means and entails river. :rolleyes::p;)

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1606.06112v1.pdf
The big-bang theory: construction, evolution and status
20 Jun 2016
Abstrac
t. Over the past century, rooted in the theory of general relativity, cosmology has developed a very successful physical model of the universe: the big-bang model. Its construction followed different stages to incorporate nuclear processes, the understanding of the matter present in the universe, a description of the early universe and of the large scale structure. This model has been confronted to a variety of observations that allow one to reconstruct its expansion history, its thermal history and the structuration of matter. Hence, what we refer to as the big-bang model today is radically different from what one may have had in mind a century ago. This construction changed our vision of the universe, both on observable scales and for the universe as a whole. It offers in particular physical models for the origins of the atomic nuclei, of matter and of the large scale structure. This text summarizes the main steps of the construction of the model, linking its main predictions to the observations that back them up. It also discusses its weaknesses, the open questions and problems, among which the need for a dark sector including dark matter and dark energy

Go on
 
Sure! The power of the BB theory and why it is held in such high regard is that it fits in snugly with GR and the particle zoo, and more importantly how we are able to reasonably confidently describe what the universe was like a short time post BB, through to the first atomic nulcei at 3 minutes, to the first stars and galaxies, to the present day and abiogenisis and the evolution of life, to a probably long cold death many trillions of years hence.
 
Sure! The power of the BB theory and why it is held in such high regard is that it fits in snugly with GR and the particle zoo, and more importantly how we are able to reasonably confidently describe what the universe was like a short time post BB, through to the first atomic nulcei at 3 minutes, to the first stars and galaxies, to the present day and abiogenisis and the evolution of life, to a probably long cold death many trillions of years hence.

Go on

Oh about this ; abiogenisis of life ; I hope it works out . Life is in all matter ; life becomes , because of the molecule(s) , the energy within the molecule(s) expresses life.

So the success of any abiogenisis experiment , which produces life forms proves my point , pad .

That life is in everything .
 
Go on

Oh about this ; abiogenisis of life ; I hope it works out . Life is in all matter ; life becomes , because of the molecule(s) , the energy within the molecule(s) expresses life.

So the success of any abiogenisis experiment , which produces life forms proves my point , pad .

That life is in everything .
Nonsense river, and any abiogenisis experiment just shows what is logically the only answer if one rightly rejects ID as unscientific: ie Life from non life, over the course of time.
A rock is a rock is a rock. It in no way has life.
 
Oh about this ; abiogenisis of life ; I hope it works out . Life is in all matter ; life becomes , because of the molecule(s) , the energy within the molecule(s) expresses life.

So the success of any abiogenisis experiment , which produces life forms proves my point , pad .

That life is in everything .

Crapola Cowpat.

The Brook babbles on.

Humpty Dumpty loves a babbling brook but not when cowpats are trying to swim upstream.
Poe stays out of water for that reason :)
 
Last edited:
river said:
Go on

Oh about this ; abiogenisis of life ; I hope it works out . Life is in all matter ; life becomes , because of the molecule(s) , the energy within the molecule(s) expresses life.

So the success of any abiogenisis experiment , which produces life forms proves my point , pad .

That life is in everything .


Nonsense river, and any abiogenisis experiment just shows what is logically the only answer if one rightly rejects ID as unscientific: ie Life from non life, over the course of time.
A rock is a rock is a rock. It in no way has life.

It takes time for many to understand the Universe as it is .

ID does not matter to me . I don't believe in any god never have ; never will .

What matters to me is the Survival of Humanity.
 
It takes time for many to understand the Universe as it is .

ID does not matter to me . I don't believe in any god never have ; never will .

What matters to me is the Survival of Humanity.
Heart wrenching, :rolleyes: but we are discussing abiogenisis and life from non life as a progression of the evolution of spacetime/universe.
 
[QUOTE="paddoboy, post: 3427009, member: 270793" ] Heart wrenching, :rolleyes: but we are discussing abiogenisis and life from non life as a progression of the evolution of spacetime/universe.[/QUOTE]

You know not what you talk , pad .

Abiogenisis experiments will prove my point .
 
.

You know not what you talk , pad .

Abiogenisis experiments will prove my point .
Yes, yes yes river you tell me that every time you decide to post some nonsense...We know all about you and your crazy way out hypotheticals on living rock, giants, bigfoot, Probing Aliens and ghosts.....a shame though river, all of it is nothing but pseudoscience.:rolleyes:
 
Back
Top