Mr.G., when you acknowledge that we, that is the present society of human on this planet, are possible evidence of intelligent designers, then you acknowledge the single species that has had more effect on this planet, in the brief 30,000 year of our social development, than any other individual species in the last 500,000,000 year. Therefore we should be construed as the main, most abundant, and most obvious, evidence against Darwinian Evolutionary Theory, which leaves open the probability that there are other possible alternatives to our residence on this planet, and we would be remiss, as a science based society, if we didn't pursue such possible lines of thought.
The Human Genome Project is discovering knowledge about DNA that is proof that individual human species are biologically different from other human species. Most human genes are virtually identical, but there are some, loci clusters that prove genes for race are different, that tell us that black people couldn't have changed into white people, as the evolutionary emigration out of Africa theory would have us believe. This has recently been reported on here;
www.iht.com/articles/67698.htm
Neil Risch, geneticist, who is a Professor at Stanford University, presented his findings here;
http://genomebiology.com/2002/3/7/comment/2007
Since we now know that humans are genetically similar in many aspects, but are genetically different in the most important aspect, we must revise our view of human evolvement on this planet.
Mr. Risch states,-- "Effectively, these population genetic studies have recapitulated the classical definition of races based on continental ancestry - namely African, Caucasian (Europe and Middle East), Asian, Pacific Islander (for example, Australian, New Guinean and Melanesian), and Native American."--N.R. This study, supported by scientific evidence, dispels the belief in a common ancester out of a single continent. The emigration out of Africa theory, which, strangely, considering the work Mr. Risch has done, is still supported by Mr. Risch in that same article. But the emigration theory does not stand up to scientific scrutiny. For the emigration out of Africa theory to be valid, and Darwinian Theory depends on it, the black people of Africa would have had to go north and get lighter and turn into white people and the white people would have had to go west and get darker again and turn into red people. All in the span of 30,000 year, which is the oldest evidence of our kind of human. To create an artificial timeline, to connect us to Neanderthals or Skhul V, is not scientific and avoids an objective analysis of the known evidence.
The efforts of corporate/science to support the Darwinian Theory of Evolution make preposterous claims, such as this;
-- "Hispanics, who represent a recently admixed group between Native American, Caucasian and African, did not form a distinct subgroup, but clustered variously with the other groups." --Neil Risch
So what world renowned geneticists are telling us, and expecting us to believe, is that black people moved out of Africa and turned white, then the white ones emigrated to the Americas and turned red, and then they all three converged on southern Europe and mixed to turn into Hispanic. And each time they did one of these emigrations they developed a totally new gene that no other race, human or otherwise, had ever had before.
Since every different race, several thousand of them, on the planet has different loci clusters of gene that determine race, then the race gene for humans must be the most prolific natural selective gene in nature, since all our evidence shows that natural selection takes tens of million of year to change all other species we've studied. Our scientists, who study genetics, tell us that human genes must change from one biologic form into an entirely different biologic form from one generation to the next. Such accelerated race change is, obviously, impossible. So where is the discrepancy? Is the observable and recorded science data that the Human Genome Project produces ficticious? Or is the Darwinian Theory of Evolution of corporate/science ficticious?
