How is saying we need an economy first agenda of tax the rich to provide social services for all "blame game".
How much would you tax them? You know, to fund for all of these services?
And what would be the lowest income within that tax bracket that would see an uptick in taxes, to fund such a huge scheme?
Because I can tell you now, middle income earners would not support it, nor would higher income earners. The reason being that people within these brackets have every intention of moving up economically. So they will not vote for a system that would impede on their ability to move up economically, and could affect future income. As I linked earlier, people of all economic brackets in the US tend to vote against any form of reform that would benefit the poor, especially when said reform will be hitting them right in their hip pockets.
There is also the ridiculous notion that you keep pushing forward, that Democrats should run whatever kind of candidate that would garner votes in different areas, be it anti-choice candidates, or any other kind of candidate, so long as that candidate offers a reflection of those you are trying to appease. In this instance, you seem to think that the Democrats should be throwing any form of reform towards equality and human rights, out of the window, and instead, abasing itself to the right wing, just to "win". Astonishingly enough, you seem to believe that a) voters would fall for it and b) that somehow or other, these candidates would then turn around and do the absolute opposite to what they portrayed themselves as being. So the anti-choice candidate will suddenly ensure women's right to reproductive health care... Because voters would vote for your party again after doing all of this, not to mention then taxing the living crap out of anyone you think is "rich" to fund services and literally give money to the poor.
White Americans voted for the candidate that was promising to repeal health care reform, despite the fact that a large portion of those voters benefit directly from Obamacare because it allowed them to access health insurance for the first time and they voted for the party that promised to take it all away from them and you actually think they will vote for Democrats when you say the party should be promising to take money from the rich to give to the poor?
And I am not even touching on the fact that those who traditionally vote Democrats for being the pro-choice and equality party, would turn away in droves. You would lose more than you would ever gain. The reason Sanders did so so badly with minorities is because he left them out of the economic reform equation he pushed.
You claim you are somehow connected to the Democrat Party and that you are an elected official of some sort. If what you spouted here ever became public and connected to you, you would severely damage the party and embarrass them as a whole. As in literally. You are the equivalent of "
I am not a witch" of your party.
Your "economy first" agenda that you are badly trying to promote here will fail and it will destroy your party. Your voting base will not support it and all those people you think you should bend over backwards for to win over, will not support it. Consider just how many, even poor people, voted for the party that they knew was going to take away their health care.. As I linked earlier, white voters in particular, tend to vote against policies, even if these policies directly benefit them, if there is even a hint that these policies will benefit minorities and women. And you think a platform of 'take from the rich and give to the poor', like some twisted Robin Hood story, and couch it in the way that will appeal to white Americans, is going to get you a win? Too bad those women voters and minorities, who combined make up a majority, would not vote for you.
Nor would you ever win Government again for possibly a couple of decades, if you run candidates that preach one thing to their constituents to just "win", and then do the complete opposite to what they portrayed themselves as.
Your agenda is simplistic and idiotic, without any nuance or understanding of the society it is meant to be for. You completely eradicated minorities and women from the platform, demand that they do not matter and should not matter and then somehow or other believe that they will vote for you, when you can't even recognise what causes their restrictions economically.. what causes them to not thrive as much as they should.. How can you fix something when you don't even understand how or why it is broken? You are like the simpleton, whose house is burning down, and instead of turning the hose on the house to put the fire out, you think you should use that water to water your houseplants. You completely miss the entire problem.
What the things I disproved, that sexism and racism have any standing against economic injustice?
Racism and sexism cause economic injustice, you dolt!
You haven't "disproved" anything. All you have done is spend pages and pages denying reality, and refusing to read what people say. That is not you disproving anything. That is just you willingly digging a hole and sticking your head down into that hole, filling it back in and then whining about how dark it is.
