of - with

origin said:
I read a bit of what you wrote and I have to say I have no idea what the point of this thread is.
Click to expand...

Hi, origin,

It is difficult for me too.


Part_1 looks like grammar - "Static". Things, Connections/Spaces



Part_2 does not look like grammar - "Dynamic"~ Machine (-s)

Connections/Spaces with direction/order give/form Flows/Currents.

Genitive gives Feeding/Eating (, ... ???).

Non_Genitive gives Transactions/Exchange (???)

Creation/Annihilation are here. (???)

1-d space with its 2 directions (???)

- - -

Stimulus hunger

Recognition hunger

Time structure hunger

...

- - -

Time in Part_1: 0-d and 1-d representation, ...

Time in Part_2 is with memory (???).
(Now=0) is Observer's State/Quality.
Memories are events which have Observer(Now=-1, ...) and Observer(Now=0) has them.
Observer(Now=0) becomes Observer(Now=-1) every few seconds.


Those are just speculations.
 
O. W. Grant said:
Those are just speculations.
Click to expand...
They're not even that, really. They're disjointed half-thoughts that don't cohere into a comprehensible message.

Your ideas here are no yet ready for public consumption. Rewrite your speculations in sentences - in particular, using verbs - if you want to have others to be able to engage in meaningful dialogue. And avoid using personal shortcuts such as 'Observer(No=0)', etc.
 
DaveC426913 said:
They're not even that, really. They're disjointed half-thoughts that don't cohere into a comprehensible message.

Your ideas here are no yet ready for public consumption. Rewrite your speculations in sentences - in particular, using verbs - if you want to have others to be able to engage in meaningful dialogue. And avoid using personal shortcuts such as 'Observer(No=0)', etc.
Click to expand...

You are right, DaveC426913.

"Simple sentence" followed by lengthy gibberish (without verbs). It's ironic.
 
Hi,

Equivalence gives Sides.

Set gives Complementarity.

Genitive-ness gives Levels/Hierarchy/Power.

Non_Genitive-ness gives Next-ness.
 
Part_1 (looks like grammar - "Static") Things, Connections/Spaces

Equivalence "gives" Sides.

Set "gives" Complementarity.

Genitive-ness "gives" Levels/Hierarchy/Power.

Non_Genitive-ness "gives" Next-ness.

Connection_over_1 "gives" Existence.



Part_2 (does not look like grammar - "Dynamic") Machine (-s)

Connections/Spaces with direction/order form Flows/Currents.

Genitive forms Feeding/Eating (, ... ???).

Non_Genitive forms Transactions/Exchange

Creation/Annihilation_over_0/1 is here.

1-d space with its 2 directions of movement(/flow/current) is here.

(... ?)
 
Last edited:
Maybe this should be moved to a more appropriate section of the forum, I'm thinking cesspool since it is not a new theory, it is complete gibberish.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Isn't this just one more sock puppet of what's his name?

I can't even remember the name; just the style.
Click to expand...

Hi, DaveC426913,

I don't mind if thread is moved to cesspool section of the forum.

The "simple sentence. ..." was post in November 2019 in a section "Outside of the box" of a linguistic forum.
/which was attacked and brought down early in April this year/

Currently, "simple sentence. ..." is in "Silly Claims" section of a certain forum.

I don't mind even if it is removed.


No hard feelings, O. W. Grant
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top