In what sense was the woolly mammoth's genetic code "corrupt"? Please explain.The Woolly Mammoth and countless other examples, demonstrate how Evolution corrupts Genetic Code over time, and eventually leads to Extinction.
Clearly not. If a letter of the genetic code changes, then the sequence of which it is a part is a new sequence, different from the old one.It is only reorganizing existing Code, not creating new Code.
You have already been told that most genetic change is neutral.Most Genetic change is harmful, not beneficial.
Are you taking in anything that people here are telling you?
And so?Diabetes is harmful, does not have to affect reproduction at all, and is passed down from generation to generation to generation...
It doesn't prevent its hosts from living or reproducing. Therefore, as predicted by the theory of evolution, it has not been eliminated from the gene pool.It is a Corruption of the Genetic Code, but is still passed on down the line, over and over again.
You have just provided a nice pro-evolution argument. Thanks, Seti!
Indeed there are many many pro-evolution examples. The evidence for evolution, as you know, is quite overwhelming.There are many, many, examples of this.
And so?You cannot prove Naturalism!
Can you prove supernaturalism?
No. Tell me what's circular.Every single Scientific Discovery Ever has been strictly limited to Naturalistic Explanations by the bias built into the system.
Don’t you see the circular reasoning there?
That doesn't appear to be a problem, since nobody has shown that anything else is needed.Nothing else whatsoever is allowed in the faith and philosophy of Naturalism.
You're managing to resist the influence of reason and science, so it's a bit precious of you to claim you're being forced into anything, wouldn't you agree?It’s kind of arrogant to force all of mankind to view all of reality only through the lens of one single unproven philosophy.