Narcissist science forum control

Status
Not open for further replies.
Then you owe me a royalty for planting the idea in your brain.

It wasn't an idea from yourself but why thinking on one thing my mind drifted and I invented real anti gravity . I don't mean the fake USA version that uses a single vertical jet engine either!:(
 
Clearly this a shinning example of don't feed the troll.
Goodbye.

' Click'
 
Another attempt by yourself to try and undermine me to convince and influence mods and readers I am in some way a troll .
Spence: whether you are treated as a troll is entirely up to you.

If you don't want to be seen as a troll, stop acting like a troll.

To be clear: independent of whether your ideas have any merit whatesoever, your behavior is that of a troll. Everything you've done to-date is classic troll stuff - up to and including the "I've got a company worth $20 billion in my head".


An example: Stop pretending like you know more than you do. You don't know how rockets work, yet you claim to be making rocket designs of value. That is self-contradictory by your own words. That has nothing to do with us - that's all you.
 
Spence: whether you are treated as a troll is entirely up to you.

If you don't want to be seen as a troll, stop acting like a troll.

To be clear: independent of whether your ideas have any merit whatesoever, your behavior is that of a troll. Everything you've done to-date is classic troll stuff - up to and including the "I've got a company worth $20 billion in my head".


An example: Stop pretending like you know more than you do. You don't know how rockets work, yet you claim to be making rocket designs of value. That is self-contradictory by your own words. That has nothing to do with us - that's all you.

Quite clearly you are trying to get me talking about rocket science in the aim to gain GSR info of rocket science . Rocket science IS basic science and very easy .

An unsinkable boat , free energy , fastest plane etc , is a £20 billion business in my head or not .

In fact I already have design plans for the safest plane on the planet .

I can't personally swim , in ship design I want a ship that can't sink if I was to ever go on a voyage , my drive for the perfect ship etc .

Additionally GSR has military ideas and design , a massive market for revenue .
 
Indeed, and you still don't understand it, troll.

You do keep trying don't you !

There is nothing difficult about rocket science but I am not going to give you any hints .


I think we all can see who is the real troll here , the person trying to bait information out of people . i.e you :tongue:
 
There is nothing difficult about rocket science...
And yet, you still don't understand it, as evidenced by these utterly naive misconceptions:

... air density is important for lift off , it aides the lift by having something to push against other than the ground .
Thrust in space has no medium to push against , the force is weak force , it is relativity .

...the permeability of space would not produce enough opposing force for the thrust...

Those are your words.

We are not trolling you. You are trolling yourself.
 
You'll be saying next that aeroplanes can fly without air ! :oops:
Let's just get this on the record:

You think that aeroplanes and rockets use the same form of propulsion.

Confirm or deny.

We'll wait while you Google it.
 
Last edited:
So, you're retracting your reference to aeroplanes in reference to rockets then.
You are quite clearly talking gibberish !

I said air was important for thrust with rockets and then in sarcasm said you'd probably deny an aeroplane needs air to fly .

GSR is also working on helicopter designs and a manned science vessel that will travel to the deepest part of the oceans .

Please do not to try to insinuate GSR doesn't understand physics .
 
This is false. Still.


No insinuation here.
You don't understand physics. At all. By your own admission. These facts are on-record and plain for all to see.

You really don't know physics if you think air doesn't play a part in rocket science . A rocket loses speed when the air density is thinner , that is why their rockets have to have an escape velocity / speed to jump the quantum gap , i.e event horizon



Now you know rocket facts ! :O
 
Vintage Theorist, this.

As the discussion starts to run out of steam, lob in a couple of brand new imbecilities ("quantum gap"; "event horizon") , in the hope of giving the wheel another spin.
 
You really don't know physics if you think air doesn't play a part in rocket science .
It does. It reduces efficiency. Rockets work best in vacuum.

A rocket loses speed when the air density is thinner
False.

, that is why their rockets have to have an escape velocity / speed to jump the quantum gap , i.e event horizon
OK, you slipped there.

You might have gotten away with just being ignorant, but starting into quantum gaps and event horizons was too obviously trolling.

A rookie mistake. You've got to finesse the crap. The only thing worse than a troll is someone who doesn't even know the art of trolling.

Goin' on the Iggy list.
 
Vintage Theorist, this.

As the discussion starts to run out of steam, lob in a couple of brand new imbecilities ("quantum gap"; "event horizon") , in the hope of giving the wheel another spin.
Yeah. It was entertaining for a while, but - like The Fonz - he jumped the shark on this one. Show's cancelled.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top