Then you owe me a royalty for planting the idea in your brain.Very funny but thanks for the conversation . Why I was talking to you I've just thought up anti gravity and have the design for it !
Then you owe me a royalty for planting the idea in your brain.Very funny but thanks for the conversation . Why I was talking to you I've just thought up anti gravity and have the design for it !
Then you owe me a royalty for planting the idea in your brain.
See post 18: http://www.sciforums.com/threads/how-does-water-not-spin-off-the-earth.162679/Do you have no argument in defense of c ?
It always seems you never reply with any physics .
Spence: whether you are treated as a troll is entirely up to you.Another attempt by yourself to try and undermine me to convince and influence mods and readers I am in some way a troll .
Spence: whether you are treated as a troll is entirely up to you.
If you don't want to be seen as a troll, stop acting like a troll.
To be clear: independent of whether your ideas have any merit whatesoever, your behavior is that of a troll. Everything you've done to-date is classic troll stuff - up to and including the "I've got a company worth $20 billion in my head".
An example: Stop pretending like you know more than you do. You don't know how rockets work, yet you claim to be making rocket designs of value. That is self-contradictory by your own words. That has nothing to do with us - that's all you.
Indeed, and you still don't understand it, troll.Rocket science IS basic science and very easy .
Indeed, and you still don't understand it, troll.
And yet, you still don't understand it, as evidenced by these utterly naive misconceptions:There is nothing difficult about rocket science...
... air density is important for lift off , it aides the lift by having something to push against other than the ground .
Thrust in space has no medium to push against , the force is weak force , it is relativity .
...the permeability of space would not produce enough opposing force for the thrust...
You'll be saying next that aeroplanes can fly without air !And yet, you still don't understand it, as evidenced by these utterly naive misconceptions:
Those are your words.
We are not trolling you. You are trolling yourself.
Let's just get this on the record:You'll be saying next that aeroplanes can fly without air !![]()
Let's just get this on the record:
You think that aeroplanes and rockets use the same form of propulsion.
Confirm or deny.
So, you're retracting your reference to aeroplanes in reference to rockets then.I didn't say that !
The comment was about air .
You are quite clearly talking gibberish !So, you're retracting your reference to aeroplanes in reference to rockets then.
This is false. Still.I said air was important for thrust with rockets
No insinuation here.Please do not to try to insinuate GSR doesn't understand physics .
This is false. Still.
No insinuation here.
You don't understand physics. At all. By your own admission. These facts are on-record and plain for all to see.
It does. It reduces efficiency. Rockets work best in vacuum.You really don't know physics if you think air doesn't play a part in rocket science .
False.A rocket loses speed when the air density is thinner
OK, you slipped there., that is why their rockets have to have an escape velocity / speed to jump the quantum gap , i.e event horizon
or argue their science is full of lies
they will ban you too
That is how they do it !
Yeah. It was entertaining for a while, but - like The Fonz - he jumped the shark on this one. Show's cancelled.Vintage Theorist, this.
As the discussion starts to run out of steam, lob in a couple of brand new imbecilities ("quantum gap"; "event horizon") , in the hope of giving the wheel another spin.