Spencer666
Registered Member
If you question sciences integrity or argue their science is full of lies , you are a troll and they will ban you too keep their secrets quiet !
That is how they do it !
That is how they do it !
I did tell you I was one of the Illuminati Lizard People, but you won't learn.If you question sciences integrity or argue their science is full of lies , you are a troll and they will ban you too keep their secrets quiet !
That is how they do it !
You write that science is full of lies based on your ignorance. I am amazed you haven't been banned. Your ideas are goofy.
It is not a secret that you are ignorant, a troll or both (most probable).
I'm sorry, but this just so silly.Why do you all comply to their orders like some robots ? Are you scared to reveal the science truths ?
Why are you defending their lies such as the speed of light ?
A classic attempt to start another hare running, in order to keep the "dialogue" going.
See explanation in other reply !I'm sorry, but this just so silly.
I look forward to your next reincarnation, troll.Another attempt by yourself to try and undermine me to convince and influence mods and readers I am in some way a troll . When the reality is you and others spam across various forums to keep people like myself quiet in aim of hiding science facts and truths , creating ostensible lies to the public .
I have read before that c is simple thermodynamics and the transition of high energy to lower energy state spatial points , not an actual thing that has any sort of propulsion .
Gravitational related !
Einstein and everyone else being incorrect .
The ''admitting'' c is the emission spectrum of frequencies of electromagnetic radiation emitted due to transition from a high energy state to a lower energy state geometrical position .I look forward to your next reincarnation, troll.![]()
You're not questioning; you're asserting. And you present no argument to back up your assertion.If you question sciences integrity or argue their science is full of lies
You're not questioning; you're asserting. And you present no argument to back up your assertion.
I didn't say I was.You're not questioning;
I didn't say any such thing.... you're asserting that your evidence means what you think it means when the absolute facts show science to be incorrect .
No you didn't say it but I imply you are implying that and trying to earn your salary with just a few words of reply .I didn't say I was.
I didn't say any such thing.
Well, I don't get paid by the word, so my posts tend to be terse. I also have a short attention span.No you didn't say it but I imply you are implying that and trying to earn your salary with just a few words of reply .
I suspect you're one of those people who likes to "think outside the box" because you don't want to make the effort to understand the box.I suspect you don't know any science .
No it's just baiting, to get a reaction, as he always does.Well, I don't get paid by the word, so my posts tend to be terse. I also have a short attention span.
I suspect you're one of those people who likes to "think outside the box" because you don't want to make the effort to understand the box.
Well, I don't get paid by the word, so my posts tend to be terse. I also have a short attention span.
I suspect you're one of those people who likes to "think outside the box" because you don't want to make the effort to understand the box.
Do you have no argument in defense of c ?No it's just baiting, to get a reaction, as he always does.
Or maybe that should be 'bating.![]()
I'm suggesting that you can't even compose a cogent sentence.Are you suggesting I don't understand the intricate details of completion ?
Twice zero is still zero.... my mind is mirrored and becomes twice as powerful .
Very funny but thanks for the conversation . Why I was talking to you I've just thought up anti gravity and have the design for it !I'm suggesting that you can't even compose a cogent sentence.
Twice zero is still zero.