My Site Overview

Status
Not open for further replies.
dumb fuck sci
lemme illustrate....

Christ on a stick. I thought the guy said his goodbye's already.

We gotta come up with a new policy: if anyone creates a goodbye thread, they get 24 hrs to post in that thread alone and then they're banned for 6 months.

It brings tears of joy to my eyes also! YEA!!!! GO FOR IT!!! :D

I like it.

I've... I've never read anything so beautiful! :worship:

You just came up with an excellent idea :thumbsup:

childish notions of revenge
vindictive attitudes

dont let the door hit you on the way out

bye? fine! BYE!

/ban

pathetic lil fucks
it is similar to the frivolous ban proposal episode
all ignore the real issue....

stop spamming

the tp is thus irrelevant
new rules are not required
 
Last edited:
What are you gustav?

You write in this broken poetic structural style in a sort of riddle-like prose. What the hell is up with that?

It's pretty fucking cool IMHO.
 
Damn right. I AM a homosexual... did you forget the obvious bitch-slapping that obviously evaided you short memory span>?

If you were any friend, you would have had more respect.
 
mind your language, boy!

17665604ah6.gif
 
Damn right. I AM a homosexual... did you forget the obvious bitch-slapping that obviously evaided you short memory span>?

If you were any friend, you would have had more respect.

I don't lie, I tell the truth. You asked me how I felt and I told you I am against homosexuals. I do not advocate violence against them, thou. If we disagree on one issue of sexuality why can we not get along with other ideas? Science is vast and exists precisely for uniting people in thinking.
 
First... Wow... he's hot...

Draq:

You do lie when you say things like:

Children brought up in homosexual environments will turn out to be gay themselves.

Another lie you said, was to me one time. ''I like Reiku, even though he is gay,'' and yet three weeks later, you contradicted yourself by saying, ''I hate gays...?''

So is this really the truth? If it is in your eyes, then this ''buddhism'' you are so intimately investigating isn'y doing you enlightenment much good. A buddhist finds no biased formula in pure soul, mentality and general sense.

''I do not advocate violence against them, thou.''

There could be several reasons why you make such a remark/comment.

''If we disagree on one issue of sexuality why can we not get along with other ideas? ''
Becuase my sexuality is of no concern of you'rs. You live about 5000 miles away, and hardly know me. Then why express such narrow and fabricated solutions?

''Science is vast and exists precisely for uniting people in thinking.''

My goodness. The first bit of sense in all of this babble. Well done. Maybe there is hope for you yet???
 
Scientists ponder why things work as they do . That's what gives rise to hypotheses, theories and experiments. You are making an unjustified assumption about how science works.

If you disagree, find me a few examples to the contrary.

In order to find out why perhaps it helps to know how first?

Newton Darwin Einstein Curie. How/why?
 
In order to find out why perhaps it helps to know how first?

Newton Darwin Einstein Curie. How/why?

Your post made a distinction between philosophers and scientists, The people mentioned above were SCIENTISTS. I said scientists think about things and that this gives rise to hypotheses, etc. Your answer supports the point I made. Thank you
 
sniffy ponders..if myles deliberately misunderstanding sniffy...if yes i wonder why...sniffy not writing clearly enough...hmm...myles being awkward..sniffy being awkward....arrghhh!!!!
Anyway:

Scientists like to uncover how things work by observation and experiment.

Philosophers, on the other hand, tend to concentrate more on the whyfore with little if any experiment (trying hard to think examples of experimental philosophers) to back up their assertions.

Of course there may be some crossover between the two. However, I have sometimes observed a hmmm, friction, between philosophers and scientists. Empirical vs subjective and never the twain shall meet perhaps??
 
sniffy ponders..if myles deliberately misunderstanding sniffy...if yes i wonder why...sniffy not writing clearly enough...hmm...myles being awkward..sniffy being awkward....arrghhh!!!!
Anyway:

Scientists like to uncover how things work by observation and experiment.

Philosophers, on the other hand, tend to concentrate more on the whyfore with little if any experiment (trying hard to think examples of experimental philosophers) to back up their assertions.

Of course there may be some crossover between the two. However, I have sometimes observed a hmmm, friction, between philosophers and scientists. Empirical vs subjective and never the twain shall meet perhaps??

Philosophy is by and large just a waste of time and effort. It seldom produces anything of real value - it's just something that most of us enjoy doing from time to time.

Science, on the other hand, is mostly a drive to find things that ARE useful, not so much the theoretical bunch but the applied science groups.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top