Ms Rowling: insightful critic of gender policy or myopic [insult]

billvon said:
Perhaps some brave trans woman will start going into men's rooms and force the issue, and become this generation's Rosa Parks.
Click to expand...
The difference is that most of the population are not threatened by trans, are not anti trans, did not know that much about trans and would not know any different if it was not for an aggressive movement looking for a fight they (yeah) probably did not want.

I attended a chemical conference today and there was a an attractive woman there who liked slightly masculine (it's on my mind!)
Ok scenario, when it comes to break and she is trans what would she do?
I got to the toilets, options? Womens AND unisex!
Go Britain!
Do not tell me Britain is just full of old dinosaur, reactionary, conservative blighters like me.
Women need more stuff than men in the toilet and we recognise that.
Women 3 men 1.
 
Hence that mind-expanding activity called listening. Some of us listen to female partners and friends, read books, blogs, essays, manifestos, brochures, graffiti, etc to learn perspectives other than our own. It doesn't guarantee an informed opinion, but it seems to help.
 
billvon said:
Yep. Very few men (and very few women) have any idea what it's like to be trans.
Click to expand...
А как эти трансгендерные мужики, которые раньше были женщинами, занимаются сексом? Каким образом у них работают все эти пришитые запчасти?
 
ольга said:
А как эти трансгендерные мужики, которые раньше были женщинами, занимаются сексом? Каким образом у них работают все эти пришитые запчасти?
Click to expand...
They're not "sewn on."

Men and women have all the same parts. They are just different sizes. Thus gender-affirming surgery (the sort you are talking about is "bottom surgery") uses what exists and modifies/extends/shortens it.
 
billvon said:
They're not "sewn on."

Men and women have all the same parts. They are just different sizes. Thus gender-affirming surgery (the sort you are talking about is "bottom surgery") uses what exists and modifies/extends/shortens it.
Click to expand...
А из чего они берут материал для удлинения?
 
parmalee said:
it seems that they've just raced past the point at which they even care about the optics.
Click to expand...
But the optics are good for them.

During Trump's first term, one of his actions resulted in a Trump supporter being laid off. She still supported him, though; her one complaint was that "he was not hurting the people he's supposed to be hurting." Now he is, and this woman (and a great many of his supporters who want the same thing) are happy.

So if a trans woman can't use the bathroom? "Good, HE should have thought of that before he decided to do something stupid. Not my fault!" If trans people can't get healthcare? "More healthcare for normal people!" If a trans woman is killed due to anti-trans sentiment? "Well, I don't support violence of course. But maybe this will make normal men think twice before cutting their dicks off." To them, it's all good.
 
billvon said:
Is this really a serious question?

Because "impotence" doesn't mean that you don't have a large enough penis. You can google it if you like. Or just ask any guy.
Click to expand...
Импотент - это не о размере, а о твёрдости органа. Если трансвеститам делают рабочий орган искусственно, то почему такое же не делают импотентам?
 
ольга said:
А почему импотентов не лечат таким же образом? Если можно сделать новый работающий орган любому желающему?
Click to expand...
Impotence is an issue with function, erectile dysfunction. This is completely different to corrective surgery.
Also transvestism is not trans.
 
Pinball1970 said:
Also transvestism is not trans.
Click to expand...
Specifically transvestitism is not transgenderism, although they are related. With all the definitions of "trans" flying around these days (Trump actually thought transgenic mice were transgender) we should probably be more specific.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top