You are going way ahead of what Hansda never meant. That fellow was in circular mode...made a statement from Newton and concluded Newton.
Possibly. I wanted to make certain that the most beautiful idea I'd never thought of, but which made perfect sense, did not get lost by forcing hansda to backpedal on the best idea I've seen since I joined sciforums. It easily beats ideas to extend relativity I've read elsewhere too.
There is no such concept that for a given object mass changes from instant to instant. Mass is an intrinsic aspect of an object quite time invariant.
There is really no concept that it (mass) DOESN'T change from instant to instant, either. On the contrary, there are parts of QM that propose that mass is actually a tensor (vector with time as a component), and that makes sense because you can increase mass easily in a given direction by means of relative motion. If we are going to follow through with a paradigm shift for time, it makes perfect sense for it to ripple through both ideas about inertia and force as well, which is the most powerful aspect of handa's idea, because it did so all at once, the way it really has to be.
We can't have objects with mass beginning to fly apart or unravel themselves or their masses just because they have relative velocities close to the speed of light in a given direction, really, can we?
Rest mass AND its associated inertia must be independent of relative states of motion, in every inertial reference frame.
Well, if you can do that (increase mass in a given direction) so easily, why does it not make sense that in order to provide mass / inertia in all directions at once, something like the Higgs mechanism is just the ticket? If you allow it to do so by means of quantum spin interaction on the particles specified, it certainly does make perfect sense, and it doesn't even need to propagate at the speed of light in order to do so.
All of the mass of the known universe is only there because of this mechanism. All of the real energy we see in the known universe isn't a flyspeck compared to the virtual energy capacity stored in the vacuum. It's there all the time. It cancels most of its own energy out, most of the TIME, until or unless inertia must be given to something real.
Reality is stranger and stranger, and that makes sense, too, because no matter how far you extend the truth of the ideas you need to understand something, one more concept outside of the ones you have just learned will need to remain beyond your grasp. That idea, too, is solid reality, as real as anything else in it.
But you need an idea fine tuned to take advantage of hansda's idea to give something like the Higgs mechanism legs. If mass can be continuously provided in a way that is faster than light propagates, everything else about the way we know bound energy operates makes perfect sense. The bosons that make it happen don't need to be there for more than a zeptosecond, mainly because of hansda's instantaneous inertia. Time dilation must work in every direction at once, preferably without classical ancient greek geometry to give it a boost (pun intended).
No wonder that until the LHC was built, it was darned near impossible to ever observe this God particle. And it does deserve the name Leon Lederman's publisher serendipitously gave it. All of creation and atomic structure unravels without it.
And thank you for being by far the most open minded person we've seen in the subject of this thread, The G-d.
