Masterbation chit chat

[Stryder]

Okay the news title's not quite the same and I couldn't really put the title more befitting of Sciforums socialite class of "More reasons to be a wanker". A news article that has come from the BBC (I don't even want to image investigative reporting in regards to this)

Daily sex 'best for good sperm'
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/8125934.stm

Simply put the more active your sexual organs are, the more refined they are for the task they do. (Just don't let it all get to your heads now.)

 

[Medicine*Woman]

it's important to have frequent ejaculation if you want healthy sperm. I think it may lower risk of prostate cancer - makes sense.

*************
M*W: I agree and have stated this a few times. I recommend 3x per week to maintain a healthy prostate. Any method will do. However, I would the Carradine technique.

 

[Communist Hamster]

Does anybody remember buddha1?

 

[Oli]

Don't you mean Happeh?

 

[Giambattista]

Wow! I'm masturbating as I read this!

Not.

Perhaps for prostate health, but quality of sperm doesn't really do anything for me. Honestly.

 

[Giambattista]

Does anybody remember buddha1?

He was a good time! He was a very driven and determined man. I think he made a short comeback under a different name not too long ago. Got banned for being a sock puppet.

Don't you mean Happeh?

Vaguely remember the name. What was the connection?

 

[Oli]

Vaguely remember the name. What was the connection?

Masturbating causes AIDS and makes your spine bent: [ENC]Happeh[/ENC].

 

[Giambattista]

Masturbating causes AIDS and makes your spine bent: [ENC]Happeh[/ENC].

NOW I remember! I don't quite see the resemblance between the two people, though.

 

[jnc1110]

Its also great if you like having droopy testicles.

 

[Communist Hamster]

Don't you mean Happeh?

Ah yes, silly me.

 

[Oli]

NOW I remember! I don't quite see the resemblance between the two people, though.

Buddha1 and Happeh?
I don't think there is a connection, I think that Communist Hamster mis-remembered the name and meant Happeh. But I could be wrong.
Buddha1 was the guys that claimed 95% of all males were homosexual or something equally amusing.

 

[PsychoticEpisode]

Simply put the more active your sexual organs are, the more refined they are for the task they do. (Just don't let it all get to your heads now.)

What's the trade off? Arthritis in both hands at an early age?

 

[Oli]

Simply put the more active your sexual organs are, the more refined they are for the task they do. (Just don't let it all get to your heads now.)

Can I send my sexual organs out for a morning jog while I have a lay-in?
Would that count as "active"?

 

[Stryder]

Can I send my sexual organs out for a morning jog while I have a lay-in?
Would that count as "active"?

Oli, If it works for you, it works for you.

I suppose you could ask if the future will eventually devolve into a idiocracy or not, considering if the genetics is suppose to be better from "over use/greater use/more activity", the "idiots" that over breed might well sow the future Nobel prize winners.

 

[Oli]

Oli, If it works for you, it works for you.

I'll give it go .

I suppose you could ask if the future will eventually devolve into a idiocracy or not, considering if the genetics is suppose to be better from "over use/greater use/more activity", the "idiots" that over breed might well sow the future Nobel prize winners.

Are we not moving that way as it is?
It seems to be a case of "I've got the opportunity to have sex, therefore I'll breed".
"Future Nobel prize winners"?
Is there a category for "not putting both legs into the same leg of your trousers"?
I think we'll need one in the not-too-distant future.