AUGUSTA, Maine -- The Maine Center for Disease Control and Prevention is investigating a confirmed case of measles in Franklin County that it says is related to travel.
The state says the Maine Health and Environmental Testing Laboratory confirmed the case. The last reported case of measles in the state was in 1997.
State epidemiologist Siiri Bennett says the Maine CDC is working with clinicians to identify potentially exposed individuals. The public may have been exposed if they visited several locations in Farmington and Kingfield between June 15 and 19.
Locations include the Narrow Gauge Cinema in Farmington on June 15, in the afternoon and during the evening, and the Kingfield Woodsman in Kingfield in the late morning and early afternoon of June 18.
Other affected areas include Restaurant la Chocolaterie in Quebec, Canada, Farmington's Franklin Memorial Hospital Laboratory and Grantlee's Tavern and Grill, CBS affiliate WGME in Portland reports.
Measles is a vaccine-preventable disease that can cause pneumonia and death.
Thank you anti-vax movement...
Just an info-dump for those that don't know - Measles is an airborne virus, so no physical contact is needed for transmission. To adequately contain and stymie the spread of measles, we need a roughly 91.7% vaccination rate (mathematically speaking, 1-1/R). The US average is around 91.9%... but the anti-vax movement has resulted in localized areas where the vaccination rate is lower. An anti-vax person that contracts measles has a probability nearing 100% of spreading it to others in their anti-vax social circle, given that it can take anywhere from 7 to 10 days for any symptoms to appear (normally starting with fever), and up to 14 days for the typical rash to appear... meanwhile, they are contagious up to four days before any symptoms appear and for around four days after it begins to subside... with the virus able to live up to two hours outside the human body (so that fine mist from a sneeze... yeah, anyone walking through that could potentially pick up the measles virus).
In a highly anti-vax community, that one person could easily infect more than a dozen others, and those dozen others could infect another dozen, all before the first person even realizes they are sick...
Worst part is, if you have only had one inoculation, you still have a roughly 7% chance of contracting it; after the second dose, it is roughly 3% (variances in the virus and "memory" of the immune system, et al).
Meanwhile, there is a small but vulnerable population that CANNOT be vaccinated, due to weakened immune systems and/or immuno-suppressant therapies (organ transplants, some other auto-immune disorders, etc)... they rely on the other 95% to be vaccinated in order to keep up herd immunity and prevent the spread of these diseases... and yet, overall, we have multiple states failing to hit that 95% mark.
As an example, Maine (where this is occurring), has a less than 90% MMR vaccination rate among kindergarten aged children...
Regarding the whole "autism" concern...
http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/03/health/the-unvaccinated/index.html
http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/01/05/autism.vaccines/
A now-retracted British study that linked autism to childhood vaccines was an "elaborate fraud" that has done long-lasting damage to public health, a leading medical publication reported Wednesday.
An investigation published by the British medical journal BMJ concludes the study's author, Dr. Andrew Wakefield, misrepresented or altered the medical histories of all 12 of the patients whose cases formed the basis of the 1998 study -- and that there was "no doubt" Wakefield was responsible.
"It's one thing to have a bad study, a study full of error, and for the authors then to admit that they made errors," Fiona Godlee, BMJ's editor-in-chief, told CNN. "But in this case, we have a very different picture of what seems to be a deliberate attempt to create an impression that there was a link by falsifying the data."
Britain stripped Wakefield of his medical license in May. "Meanwhile, the damage to public health continues, fueled by unbalanced media reporting and an ineffective response from government, researchers, journals and the medical profession," BMJ states in an editorial accompanying the work.
The basis of that concern is a study that has been found to have been intentionally and willfully fraudulent...