Not at the same time. Much of the racist aspect of US sheriff behavior is not shared with Europe, for example.we can say that it is factual that Sessions made the statement that “the office of Sheriff is a critical part of the Anglo-American heritage of law enforcement” and that “Anglo-American” is a way to reference to the common law legal heritage the United States sheriff’s system shares with Europe.
Sessions was referring to the 250 year heritage of law enforcement by the sheriffs in the US.Sessions was referring to the history of the American legal system, and more specifically to the origins of the modern day sheriff.
That's not a reference to the origins, but to the past and continuing nature.“Since our founding, the independently elected sheriff has been seen as the people’s protector, who keeps law enforcement close to and amenable to the people,”
And to someone else, and about something else - such as habeas corpus, or the US legal system, instead of sheriffs.The same terminology might not have caused such a stir if invoked by someone else.
That's because it would have meant something else.