Is this a bible thumper's site or a science site?

[DaveC426913]

That's fair enough but where do you draw the line where moderation is needed? Their are some physicists who don't subscribe to String Theory.
Which although at this moment in time seems the most plausible still remains just a theory. Should these sort things get Cessed or dumped in Pseudo-science?

Well, PF has a pretty clear line. If it's published in a peer-reviewed journal, it's mainstream enough to discuss. String Theory fits that bill.

That's surely a little tight for sciForums but lines can be drawn.

 

[Captain Kremmen]

I like the banter here, and the presence of some eccentrics adds to the atmosphere, but the balance is not right at the moment.
It needs to be 80% science, 20% alternative, not the reverse.

 

[Pincho Paxton]

I like the banter here, and the presence of some eccentrics adds to the atmosphere, but the balance is not right at the moment.
It needs to be 80% science, 20% alternative, not the reverse.

Well it is, you just wait till the names switch around.

 

[Captain Kremmen]

You mean when your views are the accepted ones.
Right.:bugeye:

 

[Pincho Paxton]

You mean when your views are the accepted ones.
Right.:bugeye:

There is only 1 truth to the universe, so my version is somewhere in the future. Pinchoism = Nature and Truth.