Well, when they can present falsifiable evidence of their claims, instead of philosophy, I'll treat it as more than a philosophical issue. Great. Are they ever going to present that evidence? (by evidence I mean 'beyond simply more unsubstantiated philosophy-talk.) Perfect. So, by that criterion, you too don't have qualifications to make any judgment on the subject. Does that mean it will stop? I'd be perfectly happy if neither of us discussed it further. < aside > No. I have been very patient about this - discussed it at at great length with you every time it comes up (which is in virtually every thread you visit, BTW). You haven't added any more information, you just keep repeating the same claims as if they weren't dismantled for lack of evidence. I've treated you seriously, and I've treated you fairly, for as long as I could. You are eloquent, intelligent creative, thoughtful and a good opponent. But man you don't know when to stop beating the same horse. You spam any thread that vaguely hints at anything you can use as a trigger word to post page after page of the same thing. My patience has run out. I'm tired of every damn thread I'm trying to participate in being hijacked with W4U's mathematical universe, or W4U's Quorum Sensing. Start a thread to discuss that topic of your choice. Of course. As I said, I have taken you as seriously as I can manage. But you're turning into an ad-bot for your pet ideas. It's not cool. < /aside >
That's the problem with "common denominators", they apply to everything .......Please Register or Log in to view the hidden image!