As things turned out, Sputnik was of much greater use to the US Navy than to the USSR:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transit_(satellite) said:
Just days after the Soviet launch of Sputnik 1, the first man-made earth-orbiting satellite on October 4, 1957, two physicists at APL, William Guier and George Weiffenbach, found themselves in discussion about the microwave signals that would likely be emanating from the satellite. They were able to determine Sputnik's orbit by analyzing the Doppler shift of its radio signals during a single pass.[4] Frank McClure, the chairman of APL's Research Center, suggested that if the satellite's position were known and predictable, the Doppler shift could be used to locate a receiver on Earth.
Development of the TRANSIT system began in 1958, ... The first successful tests of the system were made in 1960, and the system entered Naval service in 1964.
This link has many more Transit details, including:
"The Transit system also provided
the first world-wide time-keeping service, allowing clocks everywhere to be synchronised with 50 micro-second accuracy. The transit satellite broadcast on 150 and 400 MHz. The two frequencies were used to allow the bending of the satellite radio beacons by the ionosphere to be canceled out, thereby improving location accuracy."
Note the long pole with mass at the end. That pole was a "self-deploying" flat ribbon coil wound on a spool at launch. The stressed ribbon "wanted" to be a tube and did so as it unwound. That was
another APL invention - gravity gradient stabilization keeping the transmitted beam / signal efficient pointed to earth (great reduction in power required).
To damp out the oscillations, magnet material with large hysterious loop was used - A zero energy required highly reliable orientation system that would never "wear out" APL also was one of the first, if not the
first to use "momentum wheels" to change the rotational orientation, say about the pole axis. I. e. a wheel with that axis (not necessarily on it just parallel to it) is given some more momentum (or less) and the torque that does than also turns the satellite by the reaction torque. When the torque is removed (zero applied) the satellite continues to slowly rotate keeping total angular moment same a before torque was applied. When satellite has rotation angle desired, an "equal" but opposite torque is applied that stops the satellite rotation, but now at a different rotational orientation.
Transit 4A, launched June 29, 1961, was
the first satellite to use a radioactive power source (a SNAP-3) And that type of nuclear power is what has power the "New Horizons," satellite APL sent on its way to Pluto 10 years ago. It is soon to again come to life in 2015 as is now nearing Pluto, as discussed in next quote.
There were 38 APL satellites used in only the transit program the Navy relied upon to know where is subs would be if needing to launch an ICBM, but Transit satelites needed to be up-dated from the ground every two days, to correct the internally stored orbit data (ephemeris) so APL invented the DISCOS -
the first satellites whose orbit was precisely determined by gravity. The did not require any update corrections for sunshine pressure, residual air drag, Earth's magnetic forces on currents in the satellite, etc. and still only one was needed for a very accurate postion fix, not three like the GPS system now in use.
The main satellite of DISCOS was an EXACTLY non-magnetic (gold / platinum alloy) sphere about 1 cm in diameter. The rest of the satellite had tiny thrusters and fired them as need to keep the full satellite in same orbit as that tiny sphere. Hold it in the center of its small chamber (follow the tiny sphere's orbit exactly). DISCOS was very expensive to build as the exact center of mass had to known. - Every resistor and drop of solder's weight and location measured - Why GPS was made - it is relatively cheaper to make. More on Discos here:
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/a-note-global-warming-threads.40077/page-52#post-3150200
By now, more than 300 satellites designed and many built by APL where I worked for 30 years have been launched, including two that visited the closest and most distant planets Mercury and Pluto (lost it status as a planet, after the one now arriving there was launched):
http://pages.jh.edu/~jhumag/1105web/pluto.html said:
At the end of its 3-billion-mile voyage, it must hit the equivalent of a circle about 120 miles in diameter; an arrow fired at a target 100 miles away with comparable accuracy would hit a dime. The craft must arrive at precisely the right time for an alignment of two planets, a moon, the sun, and an earthbound network of antennas. Every instrument must work to near perfection; in-flight repair will be all but impossible. Finally, the project's engineers, scientists, and administrators must build this spacecraft fast and within a constrained budget.
In November 2001, the Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory took on this task, to build a planetary observatory named New Horizons, bound for Pluto. APL has delivered the spacecraft to Cape Canaveral, Florida, for launch in January 2006. If the mission fully succeeds, in July 2015 New Horizons will fly past Pluto for the first reconnaissance of that strange little ball of ice and rock, snapping pictures, mapping its terrain, analyzing its atmosphere, and sampling space dust and the solar wind. For nine months after it will transmit data back to Earth as it races toward an even more distant region of the solar system known as the Kuiper Belt, where scientists hope to extend its mission.
Pluto is so far away and power is limited so the huge volume of data to be collected will take nine months to send back to APL. Let hope it wakes up again OK after nine years of intermittent sleeping during its more than 3 billion mile trip. If it does, more research work for it (and APL) in the Kuiper Belt is planned.
This link gives facts about Messenger, APL's satellite that has for 10 years and still is giving very detailed data on Mercury:
http://messenger.jhuapl.edu/
A fact most find surprising is that it is energetically harder to go to Mercury than to Pluto! MESSENGER was the
first (only?) satellite to orbit mercury.
Just before the 24 October 2014 orbit adjust, MESSENGER was in an orbit with an altitude at closest approach of 26 kilometers (16.1 miles) above the surface of Mercury. With a velocity change of 19.37 meters per second (43.33 miles per hour), the spacecraft's four largest monopropellant thrusters (with a small contribution from four of the 12 smallest monopropellant thrusters) nudged the spacecraft to an orbit with a closest approach altitude of 185.2 kilometers (115.1 miles). This maneuver also increased the spacecraft's speed relative to Mercury at the maximum distance from Mercury, adding about 7.4 minutes to the spacecraft's eight-hour, five-minute orbit period. APL not only designed and built the MESSENGER satellite but still controls it for NASA.
MESSENGER's radar looks thru the constant cloud cover to photogragh surface. Each pixel is 160 Km wide. (100K miles)
On 12 December 2014, MESSENGER had made 3682 obits at various altitudes in 1357 (earth) days needing occasional boosts as it has residual "air" drag.
Space craft technology is very similar to that needed for implantable devices as both need:
light weight / small sizes
low power to operate
Extreme quality control (you don't get to "go there" and repair)
Remote RF control
telemetry telling how it is operating (or what is the problem if it is not)
Affordable cost - more important for mass produced implantable devices than NASA.
Resistance to an environment that is actively trying to destroy the device.
So it is natural that APL/JHU space department, with its close connection the world leading JHU hospital, should have not only designed more than 200 space craft that were launched but be a leader in implantable medical devices as well. For some details on some of my biomedical projects at APL, see:
http://www.sciforums.com/threads/ti...self-through-bloodstream.113489/#post-3251031