I was thinking more Australia , because he , pad , can set rules .
I was thinking more Australia , because he , pad , can set rules .
If I was setting rules river, the obvious nutty brigade would be excluded.
![]()
You sure?Yet I Thinking your nutty . Actually worse .
The Moon shows no such evidence of a collision with Earth .
When you make declarations like this, you need to back them up with an explanation of the evidence that supports your claim. This is particularly the case when your claim goes against the scientific consensus.
So the Moon came from Earth ? Disagree the Moon is 160,000,000 older than Earth .
Nobody should care about what you disagree with, unless you can provide reasons for your disagreement. You gut feelings and wishful thinkings aren't of much interest.
No I said the Earth doesn't have the mass to capture the mass of the moon .
It does and it did. Again, you need to provide an argument, preferably with evidence, if you're going to set yourself up as an authority.
First how the Moon came about is a theory , nothing more .
Everything of value in science is a theory.
Second if the Moon came from outside our solar system , which to me is far more likely , then the Earth does not have the mass , gravity , to over ride the Moons own inertia .
Again, you give no reason why you believe it is "more likely" the Moon came from outside the solar system. In fact, I think you'd be hard pressed to find any source to support your belief (well, maybe a crank source or a shoddy, unreliable one, but you didn't even bother looking at any of those, did you?).
And you don't know what inertia is, do you?
Gravity makes the minutist difference to anything .
Another pronouncement from you with nothing at all to support it. Not even the tiniest effort on your part.
Not possible .
And again.
----
In light of your behaviour in this thread, river, I have given you a formal warning for trolling.
I don't believe that you're actually as stupid as you pretend to be here. You're stupid, but surely not this stupid. I have to conclude that you're deliberately trolling by making controversial claims to try to provoke a reaction from well-intentioned science explainers.
Your baiting of paddoboy in this thread, on its own, deserves a warning.
Due to accumulated warning points, river will be taking a day off.
You sure?The following is evident of something else.....
Apologies...Inadvertedly left out of previous postYet I Thinking your nutty . Actually worse .
I'm sure that there are some that don't think I am stupid and nor a troll .
There are probably some. Stupid finds its own level.
.
Apologies...Inadvertedly left out of previous post
Knowledge and you river, are a world apart...unless it involves unsupported pseudoscientific, supernatural paranormal cesspool that you chose to grovel in.People with " knowledge " , are not stupid .
Knowledge and you river, are a world apart...unless it involves unsupported pseudoscientific, supernatural paranormal cesspool that you chose to grovel in.
And sadly for you, ignorance is bliss.Knowledge is Knowledge .
river said: ↑
Knowledge is Knowledge .
And sadly for you, ignorance is bliss.![]()
And as river continues the trolling
![]()