If you post something three times, how is that a moderator glitch?
Last edited:
KXOO - Your talking to a genius, brother.
I think I am beginning to understand why so many Atheists exist.
They all seem to think God is some Big guy with a white beard and a cane.
Let's change our thinking for the sake of argument for a few seconds.
I believe we are all connected by some psychic force and that essentially we are all one thing. I don't think we are separate. I know we have unique consciousnesses, but that is necessary to live out our purpose which is to create experiences. I think that God knows about every sparrow that falls in the forest because God is every Sparrow that falls in the forest. I think God the sum of all things and perhaps a little bit more.
- Psychic experiments worldwide show astounding probabilities that telepathy does exist. Skeptics can deny it all they like with firm ground based on the scientific method, as the scientific method is flawed as it too easily dismisses probabilities.
Sigmund Freud. A man known as the father of modern day psychoanalyses spent thousands of hours analysing patients and their dreams and pondering how their brains worked, and it was repressed that he held highly evolved opinions about our abilities to communicate psychically.
A;though he made numerous claims about psychic powers he made conscious choices to distance himself from those papers as his other theories were making him famous.
His friend Carl Jung may have been equally famous for his work, but Carl Jung refused to back down from his ideals and maintained throughout his career that psychic events do take place. He also spent much of his life analysing dreams, brains, and pondered how the brain operated.
Have you ever heard the word "Synchronicity". This was a word Coined by Carl Jung to describe coincidences that likely had psychic cause. If you spend a day thinking of a childhood friend and then attend a restaurant where they show up by coincidence that is synchronicity according to Carl Jung.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwyxbM2JrR4
I realize pointing at smart people who believe in psychic powers is hardly proof of it, but I think many skeptics do not allow this type of thinking as they are conditioned only to accept the scientific method and not probabilities. The only way psychic testing will EVER be successful with the scientific method is when a tool is developed that can both measure and interpret psychic energy. I don't see that happening very soon.
Until then it is sad to see so many skeptics, I think it is like watching a bunch of silly children that cannot quite grasp something simple like speech. I do wish people would look at the experiments that have been done and don't stop at the first "confirmation of fraud" you find on youtube. There are fraudulent accountants out there as well, it does not make all accountants frauds.
I have seen telepathy work. I have seen precognition work.
I recently had a dream I was a teenager again and driving my old Pinto. I was with my high school gf and we were trying to find parking at the local hospital. This dream was interupted by a neighbor woman calling us in distress. I ended up getting dressed and driving her to the local hospital in her small Honda Civic.
I awoke from a dream about finding parking in a small car at the local hospital, and within an hour I was finding parking at a local hospital in an equally small car. I also had previously owned a honda civic as a teenager. Many skeptics write this off as simple chance, and with good enough reasonings, but this sort of thing is "synchronicity" according to Jung.
I can influence people psychically, and have done so on many occasions. Don't ask me to do it here again as we have been down that road and the other party strung me along for some time before admitting heavy bias and wanted to see me fail etc. I have outlined experiments where anyone here can do it themselves. It is sooooo simple to send a message to someone. one hour effort at night would suffice.
Anyways......
- If we live in a psychic world
- If we are all connected
- If we are all one thing
Then why can't god simply be the sum of all parts. If psychic powers exist, then it is a short realization that there is likely a universal consciousness containing and sorting the thoughts of all based on some sort of vibrational frequencies. Maybe a bit more than the sum of all parts.
I think there was a consciousness floating around that was really bored after countless millennia and decided to split himself up into various souls and matter in order to create experiences. God did not experience race car driving at its best until he experienced NASCAR. God did not experience fine dining at its best until he had mac/cheese. I think we all have free will and must operate under scientific laws, however I think scientific laws will eventually include psychic phenomenon, Universal consciousness, and yes; even god.
I feel sorry for the childlike skeptics. They are so cute though. (wave to them)
God seems more plausible as a wave function
I think I am beginning to understand why so many Atheists exist.
They all seem to think God is some Big guy with a white beard and a cane.
I believe we are all connected by some psychic force and that essentially we are all one thing. I don't think we are separate. I know we have unique consciousnesses, but that is necessary to live out our purpose which is to create experiences. I think that God knows about every sparrow that falls in the forest because God is every Sparrow that falls in the forest. I think God the sum of all things and perhaps a little bit more.
- Psychic experiments worldwide show astounding probabilities that telepathy does exist.
Skeptics can deny it all they like with firm ground based on the scientific method, as the scientific method is flawed as it too easily dismisses probabilities.
Sigmund Freud. A man known as the father of modern day psychoanalyses spent thousands of hours analysing patients and their dreams and pondering how their brains worked, and it was repressed that he held highly evolved opinions about our abilities to communicate psychically.
A;though he made numerous claims about psychic powers
His friend Carl Jung may have been equally famous for his work, but Carl Jung refused to back down from his ideals and maintained throughout his career that psychic events do take place. He also spent much of his life analysing dreams, brains, and pondered how the brain operated.
Have you ever heard the word "Synchronicity". This was a word Coined by Carl Jung to describe coincidences that likely had psychic cause. If you spend a day thinking of a childhood friend and then attend a restaurant where they show up by coincidence that is synchronicity according to Carl Jung.
I realize pointing at smart people who believe in psychic powers is hardly proof of it, but I think many skeptics do not allow this type of thinking as they are conditioned only to accept the scientific method and not probabilities.
The only way psychic testing will EVER be successful with the scientific method is when a tool is developed that can both measure and interpret psychic energy. I don't see that happening very soon.
Until then it is sad to see so many skeptics, I think it is like watching a bunch of silly children that cannot quite grasp something simple like speech.
I do wish people would look at the experiments that have been done and don't stop at the first "confirmation of fraud" you find on youtube. There are fraudulent accountants out there as well, it does not make all accountants frauds.
I have seen telepathy work. I have seen precognition work.
I recently had a dream I was a teenager again and driving my old Pinto. I was with my high school gf and we were trying to find parking at the local hospital. This dream was interupted by a neighbor woman calling us in distress. I ended up getting dressed and driving her to the local hospital in her small Honda Civic.[
I awoke from a dream about finding parking in a small car at the local hospital, and within an hour I was finding parking at a local hospital in an equally small car. I also had previously owned a honda civic as a teenager. Many skeptics write this off as simple chance, and with good enough reasonings, but this sort of thing is "synchronicity" according to Jung.
I can influence people psychically, and have done so on many occasions. Don't ask me to do it here again as we have been down that road and the other party strung me along for some time before admitting heavy bias and wanted to see me fail etc.
I have outlined experiments where anyone here can do it themselves. It is sooooo simple to send a message to someone. one hour effort at night would suffice.
- If we live in a psychic world
- If we are all connected
- If we are all one thing
Then why can't god simply be the sum of all parts. If psychic powers exist, then it is a short realization that there is likely a universal consciousness containing and sorting the thoughts of all based on some sort of vibrational frequencies. Maybe a bit more than the sum of all parts.
I think there was a consciousness floating around that was really bored after countless millennia and decided to split himself up into various souls and matter in order to create experiences.
God did not experience race car driving at its best until he experienced NASCAR. God did not experience fine dining at its best until he had mac/cheese. I think we all have free will and must operate under scientific laws, however I think scientific laws will eventually include psychic phenomenon, Universal consciousness, and yes; even god.
I feel sorry for the childlike skeptics. They are so cute though. (wave to them)
God seems more plausible as a wave function
Then why call it God? This is one of those things where you're only muddying the issue. Unless God is a kind of creative force with intelligence, there's really no point in calling it God. If God were gravity, for example, the better term for it would still be gravity, because gravity is what best describes its function. Calling it God only obfuscates it.
Skepticism is the kryptonite for psychic abilities. In an environment where everyone wants to believe it works, then curiously it does.
God is not only about physical creation. God is also about the ways natural human behavior.
Religion began at the transition between natural and civilized. God is personified since the main thrust of religion is about natural human behavior. The creature would eventually control matter and energy so the mind needed to be right for that responsibility.
I found a simple criteria to differentiate natural from unnatural human behavior. I will the compare atheism to religion to see which is the illusion when it comes to human nature.
The criteria; natural human behavior does not requires mops to clean up the mess created by the behavior. This criteria was used because you will not find mops in nature, but rather natural behavior is self sustaining and mop free.
As an analogy, we can keep wild animals, in cages, in the zoo. This is not natural, but it is possible with mops (human props) to compensate for this unnatural environment. If we take the mops away, the wild animals will suffer and die. Natural human behavior is not a zoo illusion that need mops, but rather it is self sustaining without any artificial mops.
Let us look at human behavioral sciences, which follows and endorse the atheist philosophy, in terms of human sexuality. Does what science/atheism promote need mops to clean up STD's and other problems? The answer is yes. If we spend the resource the zoo illusion will appear to work. We can copy the apes, as long as we have zoo keepers with mops. Religion promotes marriage, which need no mops, unless you let the atheist work their illusions, then you will need mops.
The problem I have is not with science, per se, since I am a scientists.
Rather I have a problem with science that overly embraced the atheist religion/philosophy.
This make science political and deceptive. Behavior science calls unnatural natural to help promote its own mop religion. You start with the conclusion the atheist religion wants, and then pretend you are doing real science.
The radical atheist then attack the natural human science of religion as mythology and keep it out of science.
Would the members of human behavior mop science, who promote the above illusion, be willing to put their money where their mouth is. We will run an experiment where we go mop free, like in nature, and let nature take its course. We will shut the atheist zoo done but leave the animals in the behavior cages. Then we compare mop science to natural mop free religion to see who wins.
The whole point of the Adam and Eve story is that the writers of scripture had to find an ingenious way to explain why we're not in paradise. I admire the cleverness of the story. I also admire the cleverness of the flood story, where God promises never to destroy the Earth with floods ever again. Flooding the earth is physically impossible. I promise never to bend steel with my bare hands, ever again.When Adam and Eve ate the apple.
Surely the punishment for that should have been a verbal warning not an instant dismissal?
I think there are grounds for appealing to an industrial tribunal.
This is yet another example of God being a bad employer.
Also, Adam should have been given a gun.
Then he could have shot the snake.
God is not only about physical creation. God is also about the ways natural human behavior.
Religion began at the transition between natural and civilized. God is personified since the main thrust of religion is about natural human behavior. The creature would eventually control matter and energy so the mind needed to be right for that responsibility.
I found a simple criteria to differentiate natural from unnatural human behavior. I will the compare atheism to religion to see which is the illusion when it comes to human nature.
The criteria; natural human behavior does not requires mops to clean up the mess created by the behavior. This criteria was used because you will not find mops in nature, but rather natural behavior is self sustaining and mop free.
As an analogy, we can keep wild animals, in cages, in the zoo. This is not natural, but it is possible with mops (human props) to compensate for this unnatural environment. If we take the mops away, the wild animals will suffer and die. Natural human behavior is not a zoo illusion that need mops, but rather it is self sustaining without any artificial mops.
Let us look at human behavioral sciences, which follows and endorse the atheist philosophy, in terms of human sexuality. Does what science/atheism promote need mops to clean up STD's and other problems? The answer is yes. If we spend the resource the zoo illusion will appear to work. We can copy the apes, as long as we have zoo keepers with mops. Religion promotes marriage, which need no mops, unless you let the atheist work their illusions, then you will need mops.
The problem I have is not with science, per se, since I am a scientists.
Rather I have a problem with science that overly embraced the atheist religion/philosophy.
This make science political and deceptive. Behavior science calls unnatural natural to help promote its own mop religion. You start with the conclusion the atheist religion wants, and then pretend you are doing real science.
The radical atheist then attack the natural human science of religion as mythology and keep it out of science.
Would the members of human behavior mop science, who promote the above illusion, be willing to put their money where their mouth is. We will run an experiment where we go mop free, like in nature, and let nature take its course. We will shut the atheist zoo done but leave the animals in the behavior cages. Then we compare mop science to natural mop free religion to see who wins.
This is a word salad if I ever saw one. It doesn't even approach making sense. Disparate ideas thrown together in hopes that the confusion created by their pairing will give the impression of a philosophical statement.wellwisher said:God is not only about physical creation. God is also about the ways natural human behavior.
Religion began at the transition between natural and civilized. God is personified since the main thrust of religion is about natural human behavior. The creature would eventually control matter and energy so the mind needed to be right for that responsibility.
It makes perfect sense. God exists as spirit, as consciousness that permeates everything (including the particles of the standard model).
Human beings started out as just another ape.
It was the pursuit of God that helped to civilize our species.
Religion, and the pursuit of God/spirituality, allowed our culture to thrive. This expanded our ability to think and understand more advanced concepts. It allowed the ape to be able to develop technology so that we can control energy and matter.
What don't you understand?