Bells is funny, she hasn't seen plasmo's pm, I have. She's wrapped up in me being a sock. If I get banned they'll say it is because I am a sock, but the reality is, I'm pointing out their errors and asking a question they can't answer. Their insistance I am sock is thier build up to a second unjustifed ban. Prove it....oh you can't can you. But the ban will come anyway, unless I shut up.
Why was she banned Plasmo ?
For someone who doesn't care they were banned, you sure are 'caring' quite a bit aren't you?
As for the PM from Plazma, whether I have seen it or not is none of your business or concern.
You aren't pointing out the "errors", you are merely pointing out
repeatedly why her ban was deserved in the first place. Every single member in the past who has posted a mod's PM has been banned without question. Every single poster who has in the past edited a moderator's edit has received a ban. Yet you persist in expecting that ToR somehow be exempt from rules that affect every one else? Why?
LIES:
1)
she used the link three times not in every post
2) she was NOT told to use it sparingly, she was told it did not represent spam as it contained no advertising..would you like to see a copy of the pm?
3)The mod pm being posted publically, well I personally don't agree with that, but she said it was unjustified and why should spurious or you be worried if it was justified? Nothing to hide surely?
4) Mod edit over ruled - she had permission to use the link- so mod edit invalid according to her, again not my thing but her point of view. So far no adequate challengers.
Gonna ban me for asking questions, history repeating itself. Spurious had a thing for her that's obvious. you all need to get over it and concentrate on the shameful display you're making of yourselves.
You know you can't offer a challenge by making it up as you go along! Good try though.
I did not lie about Meta's infractions. He did receive them, quite a few of them actually from other moderators and members for his insults. So what's your point?
As for her links, she was told she would not be banned for having used them. But reading what you have posted, it is plain to see that it did not mean she could keep posting links to it. And she did not just post it 3 times. She posted it a lot more than that, and as is her habit, she waited a while and then edited or deleted the post.
If she felt her warnings received in PM's were unjustified, she could have reported it, complained about it to one of the admin or other moderators. She did not have to post the PM for all to see. It is called a "Private Message" for a reason.
Now regarding her modedit. If she felt it was unjustified, she could have reported it (by clicking on the report button), sent a PM to admin or a supermod, she could have written a post to complain about it, hell she could also have reposted it and advised that she felt she had permission to keep spamming it. But she chose not to. Instead she chose to edit a modedit. Something that every single person who has done the same before her has been banned for. She knew exactly what she was doing. She's been around here long enough to know the rules, so she can hardly claim ignorance now can she?
Whether she thinks spurious had a thing for her or not is irrelavent and frankly personal and private. She knew the rules and she broke them repeatedly, even after being warned not to. Again, why do you expect that she be treated differently to every single other poster on this site? I've received warnings in the past and I didn't post them for all to see and stopped doing what I'd been warned about. In fact, I think most of us have known enough to not keep flouting the rules even after being warned. Why do you expect that she somehow is above everyone else?
As to the sockpuppet issue. Do you honestly think we can't check?
In the meantime, you should take Sauna's advice:
Sauna said:
concerns would better be referred privately to the forum administrators in the better position to know.