I can see minute internal molecules/particles in air with my NAKED EYES. what I do?

Golden_eyes said:
When I relax and sit back with my eyesight pointing towards the blue sky and try to concentrate very deeply I can literally see the minute internal molecules/particles moving in a rapid random motions in the air with my naked eyes and they are almost numerous and countless in numbers. I myslef is not very sure about the actual nature of these minute internal particles/molecules that moves very fast at a real high speed in random motions but I can see them very very clearly with my naked eyes for sure without any doubts. I am not doing this as any practice or as any personal interests of mine perhaps its like a God Gift to me which now I will like to share with this whole world to get well aware of and to see that this real God Gift of mine turns out useful in some or the other way discovering something really innovative for this entire world..

Kindly Have Your Say.. How I should move forward with this to make the best out of it for the sake of this entire world and mankind..

Thanks
Click to expand...

Umm..rinse ur eyes with appropriate disinfectant and get an air filter system for the room you stay the most in..
Drink plenty of water..and maybe a certain anti-biotic..
 
Golden_eyes said:
When I relax and sit back with my eyesight pointing towards the blue sky and try to concentrate very deeply I can literally see the minute internal molecules/particles moving in a rapid random motions in the air with my naked eyes and they are almost numerous and countless in numbers. I myslef is not very sure about the actual nature of these minute internal particles/molecules that moves very fast at a real high speed in random motions but I can see them very very clearly with my naked eyes for sure without any doubts. I am not doing this as any practice or as any personal interests of mine perhaps its like a God Gift to me which now I will like to share with this whole world to get well aware of and to see that this real God Gift of mine turns out useful in some or the other way discovering something really innovative for this entire world..

Kindly Have Your Say.. How I should move forward with this to make the best out of it for the sake of this entire world and mankind..

Thanks
Click to expand...
Hi I just read your post and wanted to tell you that I can see them too and have done since I was about 16 yrs old. Ispend a lot of time in an unfocused mode because I daydream a lot and that's when I can watch them.particles are alive I believe . its wonderful to watch
 
Jac said:
Hi I just read your post and wanted to tell you that I can see them too and have done since I was about 16 yrs old. Ispend a lot of time in an unfocused mode because I daydream a lot and that's when I can watch them.particles are alive I believe . its wonderful to watch
Click to expand...
Almost everyone can see the floaters. They are not particles in the air and they are not alive as has been pointed out in this thread.

Here is a short article talking about floaters: Floaters
 
I was afraid when i discovered that thing in myself thought that as a miracle or super power but got it confirmed from my younger brother having same experience and now you also have it .....................
let's make best out of it if this world needs us

Welcome to the team bro............
MICROSCOPIC VISION
 
Sajal Rastogi said:
I was afraid when i discovered that thing in myself thought that as a miracle or super power but got it confirmed from my younger brother having same experience and now you also have it .....................
let's make best out of it if this world needs us
Welcome to the team bro............
MICROSCOPIC VISION
Click to expand...
Were all on 'the team'. It is normal and nothing special.
 
Golden_eyes said:
When I relax and sit back with my eyesight pointing towards the blue sky and try to concentrate very deeply I can literally see the minute internal molecules/particles moving in a rapid random motions in the air with my naked eyes and they are almost numerous and countless in numbers. I myslef is not very sure about the actual nature of these minute internal particles/molecules that moves very fast at a real high speed in random motions but I can see them very very clearly with my naked eyes for sure without any doubts. I am not doing this as any practice or as any personal interests of mine perhaps its like a God Gift to me which now I will like to share with this whole world to get well aware of and to see that this real God Gift of mine turns out useful in some or the other way discovering something really innovative for this entire world..

Kindly Have Your Say.. How I should move forward with this to make the best out of it for the sake of this entire world and mankind..

Thanks
Click to expand...
Well you know i used to think i am special too but doesn't everyone. i think anyone can see these particles once they focus properly on the air in front of them and i also think that its not internal but air particles floating around well in the air. they look kinda like shining dust moving so fast that u cant keep track on anyone particle and i think anyone should try it it really cool to see just focus.
So maybe we aren't as special as we like to think we are.
 
anaadi said:
Well you know i used to think i am special too but doesn't everyone. i think anyone can see these particles once they focus properly on the air in front of them and i also think that its not internal but air particles floating around well in the air. they look kinda like shining dust moving so fast that u cant keep track on anyone particle and i think anyone should try it it really cool to see just focus.
So maybe we aren't as special as we like to think we are.
Click to expand...
You can have all sorts of visual effects by staring or using your peripheral vision - but one thing is for sure, you can't see individual atoms or anything remotely close to that small.
 
Hmmm its
origin said:
You can have all sorts of visual effects by staring or using your peripheral vision - but one thing is for sure, you can't see individual atoms or anything remotely close to that small.
Click to expand...
probably in my head then, i always thought i was crazy.
 
I myself see these "particles", I never under estimate the potential of "some" humans to see what others are unable. It is not just what the eyes see, it is how our brains interpret that information.
Some of our brains work in digital/quantum while others still use analogue:)

The researchers speculate that it may be possible to detect even finer variations if other control factors are put in place. "People often underestimate human senses and their value in engineering and science. This experiment demonstrates that our natural born vision can achieve exceptional tasks that we normally would only assign to expensive and sophisticated machinery,"
Click to expand...
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/07/150709102846.htm
 
sunshaker said:
I myself see these "particles", I never under estimate the potential of "some" humans to see what others are unable. It is not just what the eyes see, it is how our brains interpret that information.
Some of our brains work in digital/quantum while others still use analogue:)
Click to expand...
Hmmmm, it would appear that some of our brains are not working at all....
 
origin said:
Hmmmm, it would appear that some of our brains are not working at all....
Click to expand...
I posted an article saying how people underestimate the human senses, your first "thought"(only thought) is to insult.
Hmmmm, Mr negative again, 7,022 posts of negativity(valued senior troll). Glad we still have creative people, if we where all like you we would still be in the stone age,
Have you ever had an original or creative thought? Or are your only "talents" reciting the gospel of "wiki".
 
sunshaker said:
I posted an article saying how people underestimate the human senses, your first "thought"(only thought) is to insult.
Click to expand...
You have no idea what my thoughts were. You aren't psychic as well as 'creative' are you?
Human senses are pretty amazing, when I use to have to pull samples of feed water to a steam generator, the sample was throttled through a cooler to hit 25C +/- 5C for the tests, by just using my finger in the water stream I could hit 25C +/-1C.
Hmmmm, Mr negative again, 7,022 posts of negativity(valued senior troll). Glad we still have creative people, if we where all like you we would still be in the stone age,
Click to expand...
People in this thread are not talking about being creative, they are talking about seeing a spot in their vision and jumping to the absurd conclusion that they are seeing individual atoms, neutrinos or some other goofiness. Ignorance presented as creativity makes me a little negative I suppose.
Have you ever had an original or creative thought?
Click to expand...
My company's IP lawyers and the patent office seem to think so.
 
origin said:
People in this thread are not talking about being creative, they are talking about seeing a spot in their vision and jumping to the absurd conclusion that they are seeing individual atoms, neutrinos or some other goofiness. Ignorance presented as creativity makes me a little negative I suppose.
Click to expand...
From what I gather people are trying to understand what they are seeing(not a spot in their vision),
Not everybody sees them, I understand and see "floaters" but they are not what I and other people see, it is also not dust or some "eye defect".
Perhaps some people are more tuned into seeing these "ghost particles" than others. Like tetrachromats who see many more colours than the average human. And as you said the human senses are amazing and not yet completely understood.

I would love to know what they really are, without being told "floaters, dust or eye defect", which they are not.

Perhaps if you take the time, relax, look at the "empty space" between objects you may see them yourself, I never really noticed these particles until I actually slowed down, got into art and really noticed what was around me.
Now I can tune into these particles within a few seconds but most of the time I am unaware of them.
 
sunshaker said:
I would love to know what they really are, without being told "floaters, dust or eye defect", which they are not.
Click to expand...
The question is, "How do you know they are not?" When you hear hoof-beats and somebody says, "Horses," why are you insisting on unicorns?
 
sunshaker said:
Perhaps if you take the time, relax, look at the "empty space" between objects you may see them yourself,
Click to expand...
I can, but I am not foolish enough to think that I am really seeing something like atoms. There are a multitude of causes of these visual effects - 'ghost particles' is not one of them.
I never really noticed these particles until I actually slowed down, got into art and really noticed what was around me.
Click to expand...
Wow, that's awesome dude.
Now I can tune into these particles within a few seconds but most of the time I am unaware of them.
Click to expand...
In only a few seconds you can stare at nothing until you get some meaningless visual effects - you must be so proud.:leaf:
 
origin said:
I can, but I am not foolish enough to think that I am really seeing something like atoms. There are a multitude of causes of these visual effects - 'ghost particles' is not one of them.
:leaf:
Click to expand...
Your a "TROLL" who as been allowed to troll this forum for years. You never listen to what anyone says, you are a rude one dimensional troll.
No one is talking about seeing "atoms", We are just trying to understand what we see, you are off the kind who do not see the trees but only the forest.

you have nothing to offer this thread except for bad manners.

In the post I highlighted it says
"We were able to demonstrate that the unaided human eye is able to determine the thickness of a thin film -- materials only a few nanometers thick, The researchers speculate that it may be possible to detect even finer variations
Click to expand...

not a great leap.
A typical atomic diameter is 0.3 nm.
Click to expand...

In your earlier post YOU stated
The smallest object that can be seen on average by someone with good vision is something the size of 100 microns
Click to expand...
There are a thousand nano meters to a micron,
In the study the unaided human eye is able to determine the thickness of a thin film -- materials only a few nanometers thick which is roughly 0.0030 microns, many orders of magnitude smaller than the 100 microns you quoted.
You do not even know OR CARE what you are talking about just spouting hate/venom.
 
sunshaker said:
Your a "TROLL" who as been allowed to troll this forum for years. You never listen to what anyone says, you are a rude one dimensional troll.
Click to expand...
You are wrong on at least 2 points I am 3 dimensional and I do listen to others. It seems that you are the one that will not listen to anyone, well you'll listen other cranks, I suppose.
No one is talking about seeing "atoms", We are just trying to understand what we see, you are off the kind who do not see the trees but only the forest.
Click to expand...
Really? It seems some goofball WAS talking about that when they wrote this:
"10-12 years ago i ask my optician about these particles, he also could see these particles but had no idea what they were, all he could say that it was no problem of the eyes, He believed as i do that perhaps they could be neutrinos"
Neutrinos are much smaller than atoms and move at almost the speed of light.
you have nothing to offer this thread except for bad manners.
Click to expand...
In addition to my bad manners, I am also bringing logic and sanity to this thread
In your earlier post YOU stated
origin said:
]The smallest object that can be seen on average by someone with good vision is something the size of 100 microns
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
Yes that is still true.
In the study the unaided human eye is able to determine the thickness of a thin film -- materials only a few nanometers thick which is roughly 0.0030 microns, many orders of magnitude smaller than the 100 microns you quoted.
You do not even know OR CARE what you are talking about just spouting hate/venom.
Click to expand...
I will assume that you are not being dishonest and that you just did not understand what you read. The study found that subjects could detect a difference in the color of the light passing through different thickness of film. The subjects CANNOT see something 3nm thick, they can see a difference in the color of the light between 2 films that have a difference in thickness of 3 nm. Hopefully you can go back and reread the study so you understand it.
 
origin said:
You are wrong on at least 2 points I am 3 dimensional and I do listen to others. It seems that you are the one that will not listen to anyone, well you'll listen other cranks, I suppose.

Really? It seems some goofball WAS talking about that when they wrote this:
"10-12 years ago i ask my optician about these particles, he also could see these particles but had no idea what they were, all he could say that it was no problem of the eyes, He believed as i do that perhaps they could be neutrinos"
Neutrinos are much smaller than atoms and move at almost the speed of light.

In addition to my bad manners, I am also bringing logic and sanity to this thread

Yes that is still true.

I will assume that you are not being dishonest and that you just did not understand what you read. The study found that subjects could detect a difference in the color of the light passing through different thickness of film. The subjects CANNOT see something 3nm thick, they can see a difference in the color of the light between 2 films that have a difference in thickness of 3 nm. Hopefully you can go back and reread the study so you understand it.
Click to expand...
I cannot be asked to argue with a troll,
a neutrino is not an atom,
60 billion neutrinos pass through us every second, what I found interesting was that they oscillate between flavours tau/muon These fleeting events produce a "faint blip of light",
This blip of light/COLOUR is what I thought we may be seeing, this is what interested me in the study you "kindly quoted" below..
The subjects CANNOT see something 3nm thick, they can see a difference in the color of the light between 2 films that have a difference in thickness of 3 nm.
Click to expand...
We all know a strope light can give the impression of slowing down time, what I was thinking was these neutrinos act similar to a strope effect allowing us to see these faint blips of light.

But origin knows best and we are all idiots who see these "particles",
Logic tells me there is something we do not yet understand and you never will, Curiosity makes me want to understand, Trolls stop any chance to understand.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top