Your wrong Xev. I have seen No evidance (and Bush has never claimed) that you were atacked by the taliban. He atacked them because they wouldn't extidite the aleged (and yes bin ladan is still intitled to pursumption of inocents) terriost.
What is there crime by the way and if it didn't happen in the US then how can you charge someone with it?
If a crime happens in Australia then WE proicute or not based on OUR laws
You can't come in latter and say YOU want the criminal and change them in the US (which you HAVEN'T done, anyway) and invade if the courts decide not to exstidite
Im sorry for everyone who lost someone but thats just wrong
You have to make up your minds
Either there charged and protected as alleged criminals or there just POW's
What is there crime by the way and if it didn't happen in the US then how can you charge someone with it?
If a crime happens in Australia then WE proicute or not based on OUR laws
You can't come in latter and say YOU want the criminal and change them in the US (which you HAVEN'T done, anyway) and invade if the courts decide not to exstidite
Im sorry for everyone who lost someone but thats just wrong
You have to make up your minds
Either there charged and protected as alleged criminals or there just POW's