Almost certainly. I do not think Warren Buffet will be getting involved. And I'd stay well away if I were you, unless you are very rich and have money to risk.is it a bubble?
This isn't quite true: crypto-currencies do have value, in that they enable decentralised applications. Without the likes of bitcoin, ether, litecoin etc, you can not operate decentralised applications. So the value of these assets (and they are not strictly currencies any more than any other bartered asset is a currency) will ultimately be in the worth of the decentralised application.I might be wrong but Bitcoin appears to be a more "solid" version of what was locally called the Golden Rocket scam. A form of pyramid selling that sells seats on a rocket but actually offers nothing except the opportunity to sell more seats. When the seat sales slow down the entire scam vanishes along with most peoples money.
You need to store it "under the mattress", so to speak. The best ways to store crypto-assets is in an off-line wallet or on paper (which you store in a safe). If it's not at one of the exchanges then you can't lose it to hacks.Bitcoin can be stolen, and the company won't compensate you.
Questions that have bugged me:This isn't quite true: crypto-currencies do have value, in that they enable decentralised applications. Without the likes of bitcoin, ether, litecoin etc, you can not operate decentralised applications. So the value of these assets (and they are not strictly currencies any more than any other bartered asset is a currency) will ultimately be in the worth of the decentralised application.
If noone sees any real future in decentralised applications then these crypto-assets will become worthless. However, if such applications take off and become more widespread then they will need the crypto-assets to operate effectively.
And as I've heard it said elsewhere, if you don't have an informed view on decentralised applications then you can't really have an informed view on these crypto-assets such as Bitcoin.
And not all crypto-assets are equal...
As I understand things, Bitcoin is a single application: a decentralised application for making payments.
Filecoin is a single application: a decentralised storage service - where files are stored on a peer-to-peer netwrok rather than some vast server bank such as for Dropbox.
And Ethereum is actually a decentralised application for making decentralised applications. So most new decentralised applications are actually built on top of ethereum. In my mind it makes Ethereum that much more interesting and, possibly, longer-lasting.
Are decentralised applications going to take off? In my mind there seems to be some benefit in having some things decentralised, but you do lose a chunk of benefit in centralised applications: Bitcoin, for example, is far less efficient as a payment system than, say, Paypal, but the benefit is decentralisation, anonymity, no censorship etc.
As to where the value of Bitcoin will get to... who can really say, as it's simply a speculation at the moment - still very early days for decentralised applications in general. But they are here to stay in some form or other. And while there are people who want to use them there will be value in the underlying assets required to facilitate them.
And as purely a speculative punt, the key is to invest no more than you are prepared to write off, and then hope that you sell when the market is still above what you paid. The current situation may well turn out to be a bubble, and certainly the lack of understanding that most of us have in what these assets really are will fuel this thought of it being a tulip bubble. Time alone will tell, during which many will get rich, many will fall foul, and much energy and resource will have been expended.
![]()
The people willing to buy and sell it. It is simple supply and demand. The demand is currently being fuelled by speculation.Questions that have bugged me:
What determines the value of a bitcoin?
Currently around c.16.7m bitcoins have been "mined", out of a theoretical maximum of 21 million.How many bitcoin are in circulation and how is it restrained? ( regulated to maintain value)
New bitcoins are "mined" - which means they are created and given as rewards to those solving the cryptography required to validate transactions.Who "prints" bitcoin?
Through the exchanges that match buyers with sellers. The buyer can set whatever price they want to buy the coins at, and the sellers can also set what price they're willing to sell at. Should the two meet, you have a value for bitcoin. Obviously buyers want a low price, sellers a high price, but with a reasonable market you soon get a constant flow of trading activity, thereby establishing a constantly changing price.If the crypto currency is not centralized how is consistency of value maintained?
Yes, but none that are insurmountable. The "currency", as mentioned previously, is really just the means to facilitate a decentralised application. To create another crypto-currency you would need to develop such an application, and issue tokens (the starting coins) by persuading people that your application is worth it - the same way (in principle) that a business going public needs to persuade people to buy its shares. With shares this is called an IPO (Initial Public Offering) and with crypto-currencies it is called an ICO (Initial Coin Offering)."Is there anything stopping me from creating another crypto currency, say, called Quackbit, throw it into the marketplace and watch it sore to $10000 usd as people speculate on it's future"