How dreams theoretically AND actually unify gravity, inertia, and electromagnetism

[Frank M DiMeglio]

You are way off track, and where are the specific criticisms?

Dreams are not only an experience of thought. They are an emotionally centered experience that involve language, vision, feeling, desire, intention, thought, emotion, concern, gravity, inertia, electromagnetism, touch, etc. Emotion is manifest and differentiated as sensory experience and feeling. Thoughts and emotions are differentiated feelings.

The variability and [relative] transience of the dream relate to the fact that it is demonstrative of our growth and of our [linked] becoming/being other than we are. This also explains why dreams can and cannot be remembered.

We originate at/from the center of the human body.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Dreams are not only an experience of thought. They are an emotionally centered experience that involve language, vision, feeling, desire, intention, thought, emotion, concern, gravity, inertia, electromagnetism, touch, etc.

Evidence please.

The variability and [relative] transience of the dream relate to the fact that it is demonstrative of our growth and of our [linked] becoming/being other than we are. This also explains why dreams can and cannot be remembered.

Bull. Shit.

We originate at/from the center of the human body.

Evidence please.

 

[Kittamaru]

Is it not true, though, that things such as language, desire, feeling, emotion, and even items such as gravity and touch, are merely concepts of our own perception?

For example, two people of similar body makes and builds should, in theory, respond in a similar manner to similar stimuli - yet it's been shown time and again that everything from your mood and health to your cultural beliefs and personal upbringing can influence how you react to something, resulting in two incredibly different responses to the same stimulus, partially because they would be "different" stimuli to each person, entirely based on their perception of said stimuli.

Now, gravity, inertia, and other such "measurable" constants obviously don't change from person to person (except in the variance of body mass and composition resulting in differing effects, but bear with me here), yet someone who is accustomed to dealing with high-inertia situations (such as, say, a fighter pilot) would respond far more favorably to such a situation than someone who has had a highly sedentary lifestyle, even IF they were very similar in body chemistry and composition.

You see where I'm going with this? There are so many variables in perception ALONE to work through that proofing any of what you are saying is going to end up being virtually impossible...

 

[Read-Only]

Is it not true, though, that things such as language, desire, feeling, emotion, and even items such as gravity and touch, are merely concepts of our own perception?

For example, two people of similar body makes and builds should, in theory, respond in a similar manner to similar stimuli - yet it's been shown time and again that everything from your mood and health to your cultural beliefs and personal upbringing can influence how you react to something, resulting in two incredibly different responses to the same stimulus, partially because they would be "different" stimuli to each person, entirely based on their perception of said stimuli.

Now, gravity, inertia, and other such "measurable" constants obviously don't change from person to person (except in the variance of body mass and composition resulting in differing effects, but bear with me here), yet someone who is accustomed to dealing with high-inertia situations (such as, say, a fighter pilot) would respond far more favorably to such a situation than someone who has had a highly sedentary lifestyle, even IF they were very similar in body chemistry and composition.

You see where I'm going with this? There are so many variables in perception ALONE to work through that proofing any of what you are saying is going to end up being virtually impossible...

Sure, I see where you're going - and your final destination is: nowhere.

Things like gravity (and inertia, etc.) fully exist with NO human (or otherwise) perception. Unless you (and the dummy who is spouting all this nonsense) believe that there are humans on Mars, Mercury - heck, even every speck of matter in the universe!!!:bugeye:

Someone please tell me why this garbage thread has not been locked and thrown into the deepest recesses of the Cesspool? It's not even intelligent enough to qualify as bad pseudoscience. <Ack!!>

 

[origin]

The variability and [relative] transience of the dream relate to the fact that it is demonstrative of our growth and of our [linked] becoming/being other than we are. This also explains why dreams can and cannot be remembered.

We originate at/from the center of the human body.

The ideas/concepts that you feel/believe link reality to the the transient and inherently unreal dream/random synaps firing of the brain is in reality nothing more than stupid/inane garbage/new age trash. This whole line of inquiry manifests itself in my being as laughter/gag reflex.

 

[Captain Kremmen]

Measuring energy expenditures can be identified by looking at overall mass and heat exhaust during sleep states to calculate the calorific output. Obviously the brain consumes energy while thinking or dreaming.

It could be queried that if the brain is taxed with a dream, whether the actual computation that generates a low electromagnetic yield could alter space-time enough to cause dilation, thereby giving the appearance of time either quickly passing or slowing down when waking. (e.g. Thinking you've been asleep for hours but it's only been 10 minutes, or feeling like you've only just put your head down and wake up 8 hours later)

A posed proof of concept of this is to look at the recent investigations into computer memory integrity based upon variations in electrical charge. If a voltage is too low a logic gate might not respond causing any data to pass through a lower voltage gate instead, which in turn might process at a different speed compared to a higher voltage circuit. So you end up with a dilation effect in regards to processing.

I tried that one too.
Let's for a moment not reject the proposition as obviously nonsense.
Use scientific principles to prove or disprove the hypothesis.

No good.
Any attempt to use experiment to verify this new science is just ignored.
It's just true.
Please don't investigate or analyse the evidence.

Not worth arguing really.

 

[Frank M DiMeglio]

Emotion is manifest and differentiated as sensory experience and feeling. Thoughts and emotions are differentiated feelings. Physics goes way beyond what is understood and considered here.

 

[Frank M DiMeglio]

Many of you simply lack the ability to think and the background that are required to truthfully participate in this discussion. That is obvious. There is a serious lack of both honesty and ability at the forum. Not a lack of insults though. It is so much easier to be critical than correct. Just tell the truth, if you know how and can. It's pathetic.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Many of you simply lack the ability to think and the background that are required to truthfully participate in this discussion.

That would be false.
One more time: what EVIDENCE do you have to support your contentions?

It is so much easier to be critical than correct.

And, apparently, even easier to just make sh*t up.

Just tell the truth, if you know how and can. It's pathetic.

Quite funny since you've managed to avoid the truth so far.

 

[Frank M DiMeglio]

A big lie goes over better than a small lie. This is your only chance. Are you really that stupid, or are you deliberately lying?

I really cannot help you, since a man who cannot know his limitations cannot know the truth, as a man who cannot know the truth cannot know his limitations.

 

[Dywyddyr]

A big lie goes over better than a small lie. This is your only chance. Are you really that stupid, or are you deliberately lying?

So you don't have any evidence and you'd rather resort to obfuscation?

I really cannot help you, since a man who cannot know his limitations cannot know the truth, as a man who cannot know the truth cannot know his limitations.

Yeah, blah blah blah and STILL no evidence.
How stupid is that?

 

[Frank M DiMeglio]

Importantly, dreams combine and include opposites; as completeness and balance go hand-in-hand.

The ultimate understanding of physics combines and includes opposites.

Importantly, the reduction in gravity is balanced with a proportionate increase in inertia in dreams.

 

[Dywyddyr]

Importantly, dreams combine and include opposites; as completeness and balance go hand-in-hand.

No.

The ultimate understanding of physics combines and includes opposites.

No.

Importantly, the reduction in gravity is balanced with a proportionate increase in inertia in dreams.

Aaand... No.

Repeating inane nonsense is NOT an acceptable substitute for presenting evidence.

Please go away.

 

[AlexG]

Frankie is a well known major league internet nutcase.

http://depletedcranium.com/frank-martin-dimeglio-author-great-thinker-ass/

 

[Frank M DiMeglio]

This forum is a waste of time with no real thought or participation, only insults.

Why would the force/energy that is responsible (and REQUIRED) for our growth, sensory experience, thought, and our [linked] becoming other that we are not remain with us? Indeed, dreams (including what I have demonstrated/proven about them) clearly prove that it does.

MODERATOR -- Is this a freak show? Delete the insults and wasteful and irrelevant posts that do not actually/really contribute something -- ALL OF THEM.

 

[AlexG]

Delete the insults and wasteful and irrelevant posts that do not actually/really contribute something -- ALL OF THEM.

That would be the last 55 posts.

Why isn't this cessed and locked?

 

[Dywyddyr]

This forum is a waste of time with no real thought or participation, only insults.

Don't forget that there's also wild unsubstantiated crackpot speculation. As provided by you.

Why would the force/energy that is responsible (and REQUIRED) for our growth, sensory experience, thought, and our [linked] becoming other that we are not remain with us?

Can you show that this "force" is:
A) a force?
B) responsible?
C) required?

Indeed, dreams (including what I have demonstrated/proven about them) clearly prove that it does.

Wrong again. You have, however, made unsubstantiated claims.

MODERATOR -- Is this a freak show?

Apparently so. And you at the moment are Chief Freak.

Delete the insults and wasteful and irrelevant posts that do not actually/really contribute something -- ALL OF THEM.

The entire thread then?

Still no evidence to show us?

 

[Frank M DiMeglio]

Equivalent and balanced inertia and gravity balance attraction and repulsion in conjunction with the experience of what is the middle distance in/of space.

 

[AlexG]

Do you use a random word generator to compose your thoughts?

 

[Dywyddyr]

Equivalent and balanced inertia and gravity balance attraction and repulsion in conjunction with the experience of what is the middle distance in/of space.

No.
Again.

Still no evidence?
Still having to simply repeat your inane delusion in the hope that someone, somewhere*, will say "Oh golly! You're right!"

* Assuming, of course, that there's at least one other person in the world as divorced from reality as you.