How does a photon carry energy in itself?

[arfa brane]

James. You slid right past a question I asked.

Since I can't be bothered copying and pasting it I'll try with another example and the same question.

Is the string of characters, &#Uj@/*!!4d=
real? Is it physical?
If I say it's encrypted does it contain information? I know that's three questions so if you could try at least, to answer one. Or let it slide on by ya that way ya do.

 

[arfa brane]

Done.
James is done. I hope he is.

That bullshit he posted about using "my" model is the strawman he needed.
He apparently believes I've been saying something like, "if you can conceive it it's real, if it's real it's physical".

James hasn't it seems, even looked at modern views of what information is, its relevance to modern theories. Or even what Stephen Hawking said about an information paradox.

Or what the current debates are or who is having them.

James is the sort of unique fool who can believe it's been done and dusted. There are no debates.
There aren't any physical thoughts, in his version of physics
I should just block him since it's such a waste of time trying . . . to discuss anything with a dickhead who wants to cling to those fixed (but not physical!!?) ideas.
He can't even question how he can have his fixed pov-- fixed by what?

Jesus what a moron.

 

[James R]

Moderator note:

arfa brane has received an official warning for insulting/flaming another forum member. This is a repeat offence, following earlier warnings.

 

[James R]

Is the string of characters, &#Uj@/*!!4d=
real? Is it physical?
If I say it's encrypted does it contain information? I know that's three questions so if you could try at least, to answer one. Or let it slide on by ya that way ya do.

You expect somebody you just insulted to waste more of his time answering your questions? Seriously? What planet are you on?

He apparently believes I've been saying something like, "if you can conceive it it's real, if it's real it's physical".

Yes.

James hasn't it seems, even looked at modern views of what information is, its relevance to modern theories.

Wrong.

Or even what Stephen Hawking said about an information paradox.

Well, there's a big topic. Perhaps you have something specific in mind. Probably not.

Or what the current debates are or who is having them.

One thing's for sure: you're not having them.

James is the sort of unique fool who can believe it's been done and dusted. There are no debates.

What on earth are you rambling on about now?

There aren't any physical thoughts, in his version of physics

Right.

I should just block him since it's such a waste of time trying

I suggest that a Great Trampling Exit in a Huff would be the appropriate course of action for you at this point. This is the way these things tend to be done here by the likes of you.

He can't even question how he can have his fixed pov

You're certainly the expert on me, arfa brane.

When are you going to work on improving yourself?

 

[James R]

Oh, and this thread is now closed.