How did the Earth capture the Moon ?

[river]

The "Impact" created a more molten Earth with a associated disk..." The planet was weirdly connected to the disk."
It didn't appear to be a separate disk as per the more common Impact theory, thus..."in all of my calculations,I had assumed there was a planet with a separate disk around it"
Now river we all know you will try and misinterpret anything to suit your own preferred "facts " but like I said, a variation on the Impact theory, with the Moon coalescing from that disk being a part of the molten Earth...very very similar to general Impact theory, except the disk was separate and the Moon coalesced within it.

Please please please river, as I said, an interesting proposition yet to be researched and reviewed further, like all scientific theories..eg: The BB, SR/GR etc etc

Now river I'll be absent for a while, relos visiting [within our relaxed isolation rules] and I must help with preparation. I'll attend to your further education at a later time, OK?

I've Given you Food for thought .

 

[paddoboy]

I've Given you Food for thought .

Have you? Where? When?
I mean it was sculptor that linked to the TED video [excellent by the way] that was essentially just a verification of the great Impact theory.
You made many claims that I listed, all wrong, but hey, perhaps I missed something. So river, where is this food for thought?

 

[river]

Have you? Where? When?
I mean it was sculptor that linked to the TED video [excellent by the way] that was essentially just a verification of the great Impact theory.
You made many claims that I listed, all wrong, but hey, perhaps I missed something. So river, where is this food for thought?

And the conclusion in the video is what pad .

 

[paddoboy]

And the conclusion in the video is what pad .

That the modeling suggested a giant collision with a Mars size body on an early Earth "may have" created a disk of molten Earth connected to Earth, that in time our Moon coalesced from.
Didn't I just explain that to you river, or in your total ignorance, have you decided to troll again?

 

[river]

That the modeling suggested a giant collision with a Mars size body on an early Earth "may have" created a disk of molten Earth connected to Earth, that in time our Moon coalesced from.
Didn't I just explain that to you river, or in your total ignorance, have you decided to troll again?

Nope

 

[paddoboy]

Nope

The facts remain as always river,[that is it is a variation of the giant impact theory] no matter how many times you chose to deny those facts.

 

[river]

The facts remain as always river,[that is it is a variation of the giant impact theory] no matter how many times you chose to deny those facts.

That is not what the video is about . That is the facts pad .

The conclusion has nothing to do with any impact theory . Actually it discarded it .

 

[paddoboy]

That is not what the video is about . That is the facts pad .
.

About as factual as the rest of your lies and false claims...

As usual your comprehension, understanding, and general trolling sees you as wrong....
from the transcript....
" Then came the day when I realized my mistake.My student and I were looking at the data from these fast-spinning giant impacts.On that day, we weren't actually thinking about the Moon,we were looking at the planet.The planet gets super-hot and partially vaporized from the energy of the impact.But the data didn't look like a planet.It looked really strange.The planet was weirdly connected to the disk.I got that super-excited feeling when something really wrong might be something really interesting.

04:51
In all of my calculations,I had assumed there was a planet with a separate disk around it.Calculating what was in the disk as how we tested whether an impact could make the Moon.But it didn't look that simple anymore.We were making the mistake of thinking that a planet was always going to look like a planet.On that day, I knew that a giant impact was making something completely new.

 

[paddoboy]

Now river you understand it is just a variation of the Impact theory? [probably not ]
And of course the exact methodology as put in the TED talk, still needs refining, research, and review, like all scientific data and models...unlike of course your own usually incorrect "facts"

 

[river]

Now river you understand it is just a variation of the Impact theory? [probably not ]
And of course the exact methodology as put in the TED talk, still needs refining, research, and review, like all scientific data and models...unlike of course your own usually incorrect "facts"

In my post#67

My facts are correct .

 

[paddoboy]

In my post#67

My facts are correct .

That is not what the video is about . That is the facts pad .

The conclusion has nothing to do with any impact theory . Actually it discarded it .

Yep, whatever river...about as factual as your atomic war on Mars between Alien species.
I've quoted you the text from the TEd lecture, if you chose to be an Idiot and deny what was said, that's OK and no skin off my nose or anyone else's for that matter. Destined in actual fact, like the rest of your unsupported fairy tale stories to die in cyber space in the course of time. Bye river

 

[river]

New
↑
In my post#67

My facts are correct .
↑

That is not what the video is about . That is the facts pad .

The conclusion has nothing to do with any impact theory . Actually it discarded it .​

Yep, whatever river...about as factual as your atomic war on Mars between Alien species.
I've quoted you the text from the TEd lecture, if you chose to be an Idiot and deny what was said, that's OK and no skin off my nose or anyone else's for that matter. Destined in actual fact, like the rest of your unsupported fairy tale stories to die in cyber space in the course of time. Bye river

That facts are the facts , pad .

 

[paddoboy]

That facts are the facts , pad .

It is a variation on the giant impact theory just as our young astronomer said in the TED video.
"The planet gets super-hot and partially vaporized from the energy of the impact"

" On that day, I knew that a giant impact was making something completely new."


But no doubt your silly childishness will continue, with you denying that which is in front of you in black and white.

 

[paddoboy]

PS: river, there are [at least in my country] adult reading and comprehension courses that are free. Perhaps [under the assumption you are simply not just trolling] you need to consider enrolling in one.

 

[river]

PS: river, there are [at least in my country] adult reading and comprehension courses that are free. Perhaps [under the assumption you are simply not just trolling] you need to consider enrolling in one.

I would be even more beyond your comprehension .

 

[paddoboy]

I would be even more beyond your comprehension .

Bozo the clown!!!

 

[river]

Bozo the clown!!!

Stop being a Bozo the clown pad . It would be a good attitude to have . Really .

 

[paddoboy]

Stop being a Bozo the clown pad . It would be a good attitude to have . Really .

No prizes for second repeats river.
The article as I have conclusivey shown, is nothing more then a variation of the giant Impact model.
Here once again, just in case in your ignorance you have missed it....
"The planet gets super-hot and partially vaporized from the energy of the impact"

" On that day, I knew that a giant impact was making something completely new."

 

[river]

No prizes for second repeats river.
The article as I have conclusivey shown, is nothing more then a variation of the giant Impact model.
Here once again, just in case in your ignorance you have missed it....
"The planet gets super-hot and partially vaporized from the energy of the impact"

" On that day, I knew that a giant impact was making something completely new."

Indeed

And out comes the moon , from the Earth .

 

[paddoboy]

Stop being a Bozo the clown pad . It would be a good attitude to have . Really .

Let's have a look at some of the irrational, stupid claims so far made in this shemozzle of a thread, because river is banned from the sciences....

[1]The Earth simply does not have the mass to capture the moon [2] and the moon does not rotate around its own axis )
[3]Hence why we see only one side of the Moon's surface
All the time .
[4] We never see the Dark Side of the moon , ever .

And to top all that incredibly ignorant river facts, we have this suggestion......

Who can calculate how slow the Moon would have to go to have been captured by Earth ?

Seriously .

Because once we do that , then maybe we can figure out where in the solar system the Moon came from .

I mean as if over hundreds of years, of many scientific giants, each standing on the shoulders of the ones before him/her, to suggest that those calculations have not been done!


yeah, Bozo the clown still exists!!