How did matter form in the early ''universe'' ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
T

Tyler Shaw

Banned
Banned
How did matter form in space to form a high dense state to begin the epoch of time ?

Was it the Proton-Electron chain ?

(proton mass + electron mass /V)* (proton mass /V + electron mass/V)


V=volume

m=0.5
 
Last edited:
Dywyddyr said:
Utter crap.
Every single line is incoherently meaningless.
Click to expand...
Don't talk crap , that is very basic maths that even a child could calculate at 1/t .

The expansion of XYZt , space-time , will always be 1/t . An inflating balloon never becomes 2 balloons .
 
You have brought the universe incrementally closer to its eventual heat death by vomiting this phosphor-and-electron-wasting numerology drivel upon the screens of innocent readers.

I do my personal duty to reduce this pollution by making sure it does not convert any more useful solar energy into trash heat.

:ignore:

Also: reported as drivel in science section. Recommending it go straight to Cesspool.
 
DaveC426913 said:
You have brought the universe incrementally closer to its eventual heat death by vomiting this phosphor-and-electron-wasting numerology drivel upon the screens of innocent readers.

I do my personal duty to reduce this pollution by making sure it does not convert any more useful solar energy into trash heat.

:ignore:

Also: reported as drivel in science section. Recommending it go straight to Cesspool.
Click to expand...
So you think questions should go in the cess pool ? unanswered questions that should be discussed ?

Wow Dave thought you was smarter than that ,

I am making suggestion for the thread unless anyone got any better ideas ?

Try inflating a transparent balloon Dave and put some dots on it . Then come back !

Also look up particle annihilation and density function . m/V

Also consider the Higgs field as being the initial high dense state of the early universe, a singularity that started from a high dense state with an infinitesimally dimension . m/V
 
Last edited:
Mod Hat — Finer distinctions

Tyler Shaw said:
So you think questions should go in the cess pool ? unanswered questions that should be discussed ?
Click to expand...

This is a fallacious pretense.

The basic differences have to do with the validity of the questions or arguments, and also the conduct of the querient.

These are not among the finer or more subtle distinctions in discussing physics. Something goes here about who should be smarter than what.

Short form: Reel in the attitude; there is nothing new about your self-indulgence.
 
Tiassa said:
Mod Hat — Finer distinctions



This is a fallacious pretense.

The basic differences have to do with the validity of the questions or arguments, and also the conduct of the querient.

These are not among the finer or more subtle distinctions in discussing physics. Something goes here about who should be smarter than what.

Short form: Reel in the attitude; there is nothing new about your self-indulgence.
Click to expand...
Wow that was worded well, what do you mean there is nothing new?

If nobody can answer my question then I assume it is unanswered, the big bang starts from a high dense state but does not explain how this high dense state was formed . I assume this high dense state was matter and matter has components .
We never consider that this high dense state may be some sort of Higg's field that expanded , elements being created as the expansion occurred .
Are we not to discuss or question unanswered topics ? Isn't science about advancement ?
 
Tyler Shaw said:
the big bang starts from a high dense state but does not explain how this high dense state was formed . I assume this high dense state was matter
Click to expand...
As usual your assumptions are wrong. There was no matter in the early universe.
Tyler Shaw said:
We never consider that this high dense state may be some sort of Higg's field that expanded
Click to expand...
That's because we aren't stupid.
Tyler Shaw said:
Are we not to discuss or question unanswered topics ? Isn't science about advancement ?
Click to expand...
You aren't talking about science you are just jabbering about nonsense.
 
L
origin said:
usual your assumptions are wrong. There was no matter in the early universe
Click to expand...
Do we have a good idea what things were made of at the earliest epoch?

I am surprised that there could be "no matter" since I thought "matter" was kind of a generic term that could describe practically anything(could well be mistaken ....)
 
geordief said:
Do we have a good idea what things were made of at the earliest epoch?
Click to expand...
We have a sound theory called the Big Bang.
geordief said:
I am surprised that there could be "no matter" since I thought "matter" was kind of a generic term that could describe practically anything(could well be mistaken ....)
Click to expand...
A photon is not considered matter. At the time of the big bang it was too hot for matter to exist.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top