How can a rocket land on the moon?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Spencer666 said:
There is no medium to push against , the physics does not work .
Click to expand...
You are one of two things:
- utterly ignorant of the very basics of rocketry and Newton's laws of motion, or
- a troll.

Which is it?

I forbid you from discussing this topic further until you have answered the above question.
 
DaveC426913 said:
You are one of two things:
- utterly ignorant of the very basics of rocketry and Newton's laws of motion, or
- a troll.

Which is it?

I forbid you from discussing this topic further until you have answered the above question.
Click to expand...
A quick glance at http://www.sciforums.com/members/?type=staff confirms you have no authority at SF to forbid anyone here from doing anything.
But nice of you to echo my troll call in another thread.
 
Q-reeus said:
And that is your idea of a sensible reply? Sigh.
Click to expand...
Things that are adorable about you:
- you presume such content-free spleen-venting posts warrant any reply at all, let alone a sensible one,
- you think a 'troll' is just 'someone you don't like', whereas you don't think a 'troll' is someone who deliberately "shit-posts" silly concepts such as 'rockets need air to push against' just to get a reaction',

but most adorable of all:
- you looked me up to figure out I wasn't actually forbidding anyone from posting anything. I have a fan! Have you checked out my Nobel Prize? (That oughtta keep you busy...)


I'd suggest we get back on-topic, but it is clear to all (except Q-reeus apparently) that the OP is just trolling, so there's no real topic to get back to.
 
DaveC426913 said:
Things that are adorable about you:
- you presume such content-free spleen-venting posts warrant any reply at all, let alone a sensible one,
- you think a 'troll' is just 'someone you don't like', whereas you don't think a 'troll' is someone who deliberately "shit-posts" silly concepts such as 'rockets need air to push against' just to get a reaction',

but most adorable of all:
- you looked me up to figure out I wasn't actually forbidding anyone from posting anything. I have a fan! Have you checked out my Nobel Prize? (That oughtta keep you busy...)


I'd suggest we get back on-topic, but it is clear to all (except Q-reeus apparently) that the OP is just trolling, so there's no real topic to get back to.
Click to expand...
You have become unhinged. Pulled up too many times by yours truly for posting shit, while posing as an instructor of babes. Truth often hurts, and it's showing loudly with you.
 
DaveC426913 said:
You are one of two things:
- utterly ignorant of the very basics of rocketry and Newton's laws of motion, or
- a troll.

Which is it?

I forbid you from discussing this topic further until you have answered the above question.
Click to expand...

Your misguided speculations are unfounded garbage !

Rocket science is simple science !
 
Spencer666 said:
Taking you back to a previous post #49

There is no air on the moon for combustion

We can see in the video , flames on the launch platform

:O
Click to expand...
A nice troll, opening up yet another avenue of faux-ignorance on your part, this time to do with the chemistry of rocket propellants.
 
Janus58 said:
Put's me in in mind of a song:

"Oh Christmas crank, Oh Christmas crank, how faulty is your logic,
Oh Christmas crank , Oh Christmas crank, how faulty is your logic,

Your plan has one big fatal flaw,
It breaks the first and second law,
Oh Christmas crank, oh Christmas crank, why did you not learn physics?"
Click to expand...
Presumably to the tune of Tannenbaum?
 
Last edited:
Troll is trolling.

The combination of
- cliche-like misunderstanding of rocketry (needs air to push against, no combustion in space, etc.)
- emphaticness of conviction and use of exclamation marks
- refusal to actually address valid physics
is a dead giveaway.
 
billvon said:
you
Click to expand...

you may be talking to one of the keto scam posters who keep posting those threads trying to get people to give them their credit card numbers etc.

posting troll posts baiting the site to test the water from the inside

conspiracy theorists tend to be more interested in fake vitamin sales media buying things on impulse sales gimmick talk.
 
Last edited:
billvon said:
Yes, yes it is. Perhaps learn about it! It's an interesting subject.

That's why jet engines don't work there but rockets do.

And you can see in SpaceX launch videos, flames from the second stage when it ignites outside our atmosphere.
Click to expand...

Do you mean the videos that show live real footage of a lift off , then when they enter space they switch to CGI video ?

:O


Where is the information coming from you should be wondering .
 
Spencer666 said:
Do you mean the videos that show live real footage of a lift off , then when they enter space they switch to CGI video ?

:O


Where is the information coming from you should be wondering .
Click to expand...
And you detect the video coming from space is CGI generated exactly how?

:)
 
Spencer666 said:
Cross referencing my other thread , to me if they did land , the view I observe in the video , is they used some form of electromagnetic distortion to land !
Click to expand...
If?

You're a flat Earther, and now moon landing denier as well?
Spencer666 said:
Taking you back to a previous post #49
Click to expand...
Must we?

Spencer666 said:
There is no air on the moon for combustion

We can see in the video , flames on the launch platform
Click to expand...
How rockets work in space..
rocket_captioned.jpg


How the moon lander worked on the moon:

https://www.space.com/17411-apollo-11-moon-landing-explained-infographic.html
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top